Perspective
Sep. 10, 2015
LETTER: Don't forget that CEQA is patterned on NEPA
I write to follow-up to the excellent article on the oral argument before the California Supreme Court in Center for Biological Diversity v. Dept. of Fish and Wildlife. By Nicholas C. Yost
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR COLUMN
I write to follow-up to the excellent article on the oral argument before the California Supreme Court in Center for Biological Diversity v. Dept. of Fish and Wildlife. ["Justices grill lawyers on development," Sept. 3]. The article noted that a principal issue under the California Environmental Quality Act was whether the "no action" alternative under that law should assume no construction of ...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In