By Peter Blumberg
Daily Journal Staff Writer
Here's a reason to pay judges better: so they don't need to own stock to boost their incomes.
The problem with judges investing in stock is they might be called on to rule in a case involving a corporation in which they hold an interest. And when that happens, the potential for conflicts of interest puts them in an awkward spot.
 ...
Daily Journal Staff Writer
Here's a reason to pay judges better: so they don't need to own stock to boost their incomes.
The problem with judges investing in stock is they might be called on to rule in a case involving a corporation in which they hold an interest. And when that happens, the potential for conflicts of interest puts them in an awkward spot.
 ...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In



