By Laura Ernde
Daily Journal Staff Writer Consumers can't pre-emptively sue businesses to remove offensive fine print in service contracts, the California Supreme Court held Thursday. Only after a company tries to enforce a questionable provision, such as a mandatory arbitration clause or a large cancellation fee, can a customer challenge the term in court under the Consumer Legal Remedies Act. Meyer v. Sprint Spectrum, 2009 DJDAR 1452.
Daily Journal Staff Writer Consumers can't pre-emptively sue businesses to remove offensive fine print in service contracts, the California Supreme Court held Thursday. Only after a company tries to enforce a questionable provision, such as a mandatory arbitration clause or a large cancellation fee, can a customer challenge the term in court under the Consumer Legal Remedies Act. Meyer v. Sprint Spectrum, 2009 DJDAR 1452.
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In



