This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You have to be a subscriber to view this page.

Law Practice

Mar. 12, 2002

California Courts Play Catch-Up in Growing Area of Toxic Mold Litigation

Perusing the recent verdicts and settlements, one certainly will discover a healthy smattering of cases involving mold. Mold shows up in construction-defect litigation with leaky buildings, in environmental personal-injury claims involving "sick building syndrome" and in insurance bad-faith claims in which a carrier has refused to cover or adequately pay for certain types of repairs.

Timothy D. Reuben

Reuben Mediation

Tim Reuben spent more than 40 years handling complex legal disputes in California's state and federal courts. As the founder and managing partner of Reuben Raucher & Blum in Los Angeles, he has worked on a wide range of matters through jury and bench trials, arbitration, mediation, judicial reference, and settlement conferences across multiple areas of civil law, including commercial, real estate, construction, employment, intellectual property, insurance, professional liability, and unfair competition.

See more...

Perusing the recent verdicts and settlements, one certainly will discover a healthy smattering of cases involving mold. Mold shows up in construction-defect litigation with leaky buildings, in environmental personal-injury claims involving "sick building syndrome" and in insurance bad-faith claims in which a carrier has refused to cover or adequately pay for certain types of repairs.

One case in Sacramento involving insurance returned a jury verdict for $18.5 million, $18 million ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up