The Jan. 13 decision of the 2nd District Court of Appeal in In re C.M., 2015 DJDAR 446, deserves careful consideration. Assuming it is correctly decided - and it may not be - In re C.M. raises serious questions regarding whether the current state of the law sufficiently protects children's best interests.
C.M. is a 14-year-old girl who grew up living with her mother, maternal half-sister, and maternal grandparents in the grandparents' apartment in Southern California...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In



