Perspective
Dec. 2, 2014
Restrictions hinder socially useful practices by banks
California places substantive and procedural restrictions on lenders' right to deficiency judgments upon the foreclosure of real property, hindering socially useful practices by banks. By John Claassen
California places substantive and procedural limits on lenders' right to deficiency judgments upon the foreclosure of real property. Some of these limits have been taken up over the past month by the 5th District Court of Appeal in First California Bank v. McDonald, 2014 DJDAR (Oct. 25, 2014). The decision provoked a concurrence and has been modified by the court no less than twice since it was issued in October, most recently on No...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In