| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
A155224
|
In re M.T.
Restitution order to pay for victim's stolen phone after fight was not appealable because there is no final judgment when a minor is placed on informal supervision. |
Juveniles |
|
I. Petrou | Dec. 27, 2019 |
|
S240156
|
Mathews v. Becerra
Psychotherapist plaintiffs asserted a legally cognizable right to privacy claim under the California Constitution when they challenged the statutory mandate that they report patients who admitted to viewing child pornography. |
Constitutional Law |
|
G. Liu | Dec. 27, 2019 |
|
S245996
|
San Diegans for Open Government v. Public Facilities Financing
Under Government Code Section 1092, only parties to contract at issue have right to sue to avoid contract allegedly made in violation of Section 1090; thus, plaintiff lacked standing. |
Government |
|
C. Corrigan | Dec. 27, 2019 |
|
16-72982
|
Amended Opinion: Zuniga v. Barr
Petitioner had right to counsel in reasonable fear review proceedings initiated under 8 U.S.C. Section 1228, and Immigration Judge failed to obtain valid waiver of that right. |
Immigration |
|
P. Curiam (9th Cir.) | Dec. 27, 2019 |
|
18-36087
|
Danielson v. Inslee
Public employee unions may use their good faith reliance on then-existing precedent to shield themselves from retrospective monetary liability for pre-'Janus' collection of compulsory agency fees from non-union members. |
Labor Law |
|
J. Nguyen | Dec. 27, 2019 |
|
13-99003
|
Carter v. Davis
Counsel made legitimate tactical decision to focus on positive aspects of defendant's career and family life as an adult, rather than giving greater emphasis to his traumatic childhood. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
P. Curiam (9th Cir.) | Dec. 27, 2019 |
|
G055631
|
Modification: Placencia v. Strazicich
Probate court did not err by denying petitioner's right of survivorship to joint bank account because decedent left clear statements in his will that he did not want petitioner to have the right of survivorship. |
probate_and_trusts |
|
R. Ikola | Dec. 26, 2019 |
|
C080342
|
Covington v. Great Basin Unified Air Pollution Control Dist.
Mitigation measures that aim to detect greenhouse gas emissions are adequate to ensure energy facilities adhere to their emission limitation commitments; detection is sufficient to deter non-compliance. |
Environmental Law |
|
C. Blease | Dec. 26, 2019 |
|
F068714
|
Modification: People v. Medrano
Defendants were prejudiced by trial court's instruction on the now-invalid natural and probable consequences theory as it related to attempted murder, so defendants' convictions for attempted murder must be reversed. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
R. Peña | Dec. 26, 2019 |
|
C087675
|
People v. Brantley
Penal Code Section 1170.1(c) was inapplicable to defendant's new sentence for additional felony committed while in prison because sentence imposed after defendant was already released. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
H. Hull | Dec. 26, 2019 |
|
18-15665
|
Tuuamalemalo v. Greene
It was clearly established that officer's use of chokehold on non-resisting, restrained person violates Fourth Amendment's prohibition on use of excessive force; thus, officer not entitled to qualified immunity. |
Civil Rights |
|
P. Curiam (9th Cir.) | Dec. 26, 2019 |
|
18-30141
|
U.S. v. Harrington
United States Sentencing Guideline Section 2A2.2(a)'s base level offenses are not exclusive of Section 2A2.2(b)'s specific offense characteristics; a defendant may be sentenced cumulatively under both sections. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
W. Fletcher | Dec. 26, 2019 |
|
19-56417
|
Al Otro Lado v. Wolf
Order |
|
Dec. 24, 2019 | ||
|
19-36020
|
John Doe #1 v. Trump
Order |
|
Dec. 24, 2019 | ||
|
C088882
|
Modification: Meadowbrook Ins. Co. v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.
Title 8, Section 9795.3 provided an applicable fee schedule and the interpreting service provider failed to timely request second review of the workers' compensation carrier's refusal to pay. |
Workers' Compensation |
|
E. Duarte | Dec. 24, 2019 |
|
E055062
|
People v. Windfield
Defendants' right to confrontation not violated when missing witness's previously recorded testimony is played at murder trial because state exercised due diligence. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
M. Ramirez | Dec. 24, 2019 |
|
D074871
|
People v. Keene
Defense counsel has an affirmative duty to object to restitution fees and to move for an ability to pay hearing; failure to do so forfeits the issue on appeal. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
R. Huffman | Dec. 24, 2019 |
|
17-50336
|
U.S. v. Lozoya
Order |
|
Dec. 24, 2019 | ||
|
18-15691
|
Amended Opinion: Walden v. State of Nevada
State that removes case to federal court waives immunity from suit on all federal-law claims, including those that Congress failed to apply to states through unequivocal and valid abrogation of Eleventh Amendment immunity. |
Immunity |
|
A. Tashima | Dec. 24, 2019 |
|
B290665
|
C.W. Howe Partners Inc. v. Mooradian
Anti-SLAPP motion to strike denied to homeowners because Indemnity clause in remodeling contract not an issue of public interest. |
Anti-SLAPP |
|
D. Perluss | Dec. 23, 2019 |
|
D075373
|
Gordon v. ARC Manufacturing, Inc.
Primary assumption of risk doctrine not available to defendant because no relationship existed between defendant and professional roofer who fell during inspection. |
Civil Procedure |
|
W. Dato | Dec. 23, 2019 |
|
F075855
|
Beames v. City of Visalia
A municipality's failure to provide an adequate administrative appeals process can be a due process violation under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983, entitling the plaintiff to attorney fees under Section 1988. |
Civil Rights |
|
M. Smith | Dec. 23, 2019 |
|
E071694
|
City of Desert Hot Springs v. Valenti
Trial court applied improper legal standard to City's motion for appointment of receiver for nuisance by not addressing requirements in Health and Safety Code Section 17980.7(c), and instead addressing plan's economic viability. |
Torts |
|
A. McKinster | Dec. 23, 2019 |
|
A155098
|
SF Urban Forest Coalition v. City and County of San Francisco
A 'local agency' created pursuant to a state statute is a state agency, not an agency of the local municipality; thus, it need not comply with local public access rules. |
Administrative Agencies |
|
S. Margulies | Dec. 23, 2019 |
|
18-36017
|
Wilson v. Huuuge Inc.
App user did not have constructive notice of terms of use, which contained arbitration clause, because terms were 'buried twenty thousand leagues under the sea.' |
Arbitration |
|
M. McKeown | Dec. 23, 2019 |
|
17-17130
|
Amended Opinion: Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations v. Glaser
District court erred by interpreting 'entirely' to mean 'majority,' in Clean Water Act's exemption to permitting requirement, and error was but-for cause of dismissal of plaintiff's claim; thus, dismissal was reversed. |
Water Rights |
|
M. Smith | Dec. 23, 2019 |
|
18-35982
|
Columbia Riverkeeper v. Wheeler
Constructive submission found where state failed over long period of time to submit 'total maximum daily loads' under Clean Water Act, and clearly and unambiguously decided not to submit any TMDL. |
Environmental Law |
|
M. McKeown | Dec. 23, 2019 |
|
E069752
|
Smith v. LoanMe, Inc.
Privacy Act not violated when a phone conversation was recorded by loan business with non-consenting caller because statute only prohibits eavesdroppers from recording calls. |
Civil Procedure |
|
F. Menetrez | Dec. 23, 2019 |
|
17-50336
|
U.S. v. Lozoya
Order |
|
Dec. 23, 2019 | ||
|
A152988
|
Modification: United Artists Theater Circuit v. Regional Water Quality Control Board
Prior owner may be named in cleanup order as one who 'permitted' discharge if it knew or should have known that lessee's activity presented a reasonable possibility of hazardous waste discharge. |
Environmental Law |
|
M. Simons | Dec. 20, 2019 |