For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Read Today's Digital Edition
Place Your Legal Notices
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court

Name Category Published
Morales v. Sherman
A petition is not second or successive when there is an amended judgment and the petition is the first one following that amended judgment. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 9th Jan. 31, 2020
Karasek v. Regents of the University of California
Under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, liability attaches when a school's official policy is deliberately indifferent to sexual harassment in any context subject to the school's control. 		Civil Rights 9th Jan. 31, 2020
People v. Hoyt
Capital defendant's showing that trial counsel was unqualified to try a capital case per the California Rules of Court was not enough to sustain an ineffective assistance of counsel claim. 		Criminal Law and Procedure CASC Jan. 31, 2020
K.J. v. Los Angeles Unified School District
In notices of appeal, an omitted attorney must be included when it is reasonably clear that the attorney intended to join in the appeal, and respondent was not prejudiced by omission. 		Civil Procedure CASC Jan. 31, 2020
Brome v. Cal. Highway Patrol
Officer was routinely denied backup assistance during enforcement stops due to his sexual orientation; thus, working conditions were so intolerable that reasonable employee would have been forced to resign. 		Employment Discrimination 1DCA/5 Jan. 30, 2020
People v. Kerbs
Extension of a civil commitment under Penal Code Section 1026.5(b) must be buttressed by substantial evidence; conjectural testimony regarding an individual's future dangerousness cannot justify a commitment's extension. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 1DCA/2 Jan. 30, 2020
Parsons v. Ryan
A coercive and compensatory contempt order is civil in nature and thus does not provide the same due process protections as a criminal contempt order. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 9th Jan. 30, 2020
People v. Adams
'People v. Duenas's holding was in error; indigent defendants do not have a due process right entitling them to an ability-to-pay hearing prior to the court imposing fines and fees. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 6DCA Jan. 30, 2020
Department of Homeland Security v. New York
Order 		USSC Jan. 29, 2020
Thimon v. City of Newark
City was not liable for creating dangerous condition of public property when victim was hit by driver in crosswalk because there was no history of collisions involving pedestrians in 10 years. 		Torts 1DCA/2 Jan. 29, 2020
Fenimore v. The Regents of the University of California
Lower court relied on incorrect dates when it denied plaintiff's motion to amend since complaint was filed within the statue-governed two year limitation. 		Civil Procedure 2DCA/8 Jan. 29, 2020
People v. Vasquez
Substantial evidence supported trial court's implied finding that defendant acted with separate objective and intent when he stabbed victim than he did when he bit her; thus, multiple punishments were appropriate. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 2DCA/5 Jan. 29, 2020
People v. Cota
Penal Code Section 954 prohibits dual convictions for assault under Section 245(a)(1) and (a)(4) because they are different statements of the same offense. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 4DCA/3 Jan. 29, 2020
Modification: People v. Roles
A record affirmatively showing defendant acknowledged his right to a jury with extensive conversations with defense counsel is a knowing and intelligent waiver. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 3DCA Jan. 29, 2020
Lopez-Aguilar v. Barr
Oregon Revised Statutes Section 164.395's robbery elements do not match the generic robbery offense elements; thus, petitioner's conviction was not an aggravated felony subjecting him to removal under the INA. 		Immigration 9th Jan. 29, 2020
Davis v. U.S.
Order 		USSC Jan. 28, 2020
In re J.M.
Welfare and Institutions Code Section 336.26(c)(4) allows the juvenile court to select a permanent plan under specified conditions without first finding a child adoptable. 		Juveniles 6DCA Jan. 28, 2020
In re Q.R.
An electronic search condition is not unconstitutionally overbroad as applied to minor if the nature of minor's crimes is directly related to using electronic devices. 		Juveniles 6DCA Jan. 28, 2020
The Democratic National Committee v. Hobbs
Arizona's criminalization of third-person ballot delivery and categorical disqualification of out-of-precinct ballots was racially motivated; thus, it violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and the Fifteenth Amendment. 		Civil Rights 9th Jan. 28, 2020
Hance v. Super Store Industries
Contracts which violate the canons of professional ethics of attorneys may for that reason be void. 		Contracts 5DCA Jan. 27, 2020
In re A.J.
Respondents created a fundamental unfairness that constituted prejudice when they failed to provide incarcerated juvenile with custody hearing notice and refused to appoint him counsel. 		Juveniles 2DCA/5 Jan. 27, 2020
Jensen v. iShares Trust
The Investment Company Act of 1940 does not grant investors who purchased securities on the secondary market standing to bring a claim under the Security and Exchange Act of 1933. 		Securities 1DCA/2 Jan. 27, 2020
U.S. v. Cooley
Order 		9th Jan. 27, 2020
Conde Quevedo v. Barr
Guatemalans who only report criminal activity of gangs to police without doing more are not a cognizable distinct social group for purposes of withholding removal. 		Immigration 9th Jan. 27, 2020
Presbyterian Camp and Conference Centers v. S.C. (California Dept. of Forestry and Fire Protection)
Order 		CASC Jan. 24, 2020
Hensel Phelps Construction Co. v. Superior Court
Parties to construction contract may not contractually determine when statute of limitations begins to run under Civil Code Section 941 because statute's date of 'substantial completion' is an objective fact. 		Civil Procedure 4DCA/1 Jan. 24, 2020
Schmidt v. Superior Court
A constitutional finding of judicial gender bias warranting reversal on due process grounds is only appropriate when 'extreme facts' demonstrate a probability of actual bias. 		Constitutional Law 2DCA/8 Jan. 24, 2020
Hedayatzadeh v. City of Del Mar
No liability for city not erecting a pedestrian barrier preventing the public from willfully accessing hazardous areas. 		Torts 4DCA/1 Jan. 24, 2020
Zemek v. Superior Court
A court's denial of a Section 995 motion will be upheld if evidence shows either express malice or implied malice. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 4DCA/2 Jan. 24, 2020
Roger v. County of Riverside
Government Claims Act prohibited respondent from using 'timeliness' defense in litigation because respondent failed to notify complainant of defect in claim as required. 		Torts 4DCA/2 Jan. 24, 2020
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.