For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Read Today's Digital Edition
Place Your Legal Notices
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court

Name Category Published
Lopez v. Ledesma
Agency relationship with supervising physician defines scope of physician assistant's license, for purposes of Civil Code Section 3333.2's damages limitation. 		Remedies 2DCA/2 Mar. 26, 2020
Milam v. Harrington
District court erred by refusing to consider petitioner's mental impairment as cause of untimely filing of habeas petition simply because he was represented by counsel. 		Prisoners' Rights 9th Mar. 26, 2020
Redgrave v. Ducey
9th Mar. 26, 2020
Modification: King and Gardiner Farms, LLC v. County of Kern
Mitigation measure for project's significant impacts to water supplies inappropriately deferred formulation of the measures and thus violated California Environmental Quality Act. 		Environmental Law 5DCA Mar. 25, 2020
Modification: People v. Cota
Requiring probationer to surrender electronic devices to search at any time was burdensome and intrusive; thus a correspondingly substantial and particularized justification was required. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 4DCA/1 Mar. 25, 2020
Modification: Siry Investment v. Farkhondehpour
Imposition of lesser sanctions is 'not an absolute prerequisite' to imposition of terminating sanctions for violation of court order. 		Civil Procedure 2DCA/2 Mar. 25, 2020
City of Redondo Beach v. Padilla
Legislature did not provide clear intent that Voter Participation Rights Act applies to charter cities. 		Constitutional Law 2DCA/7 Mar. 25, 2020
People v. Mitchell
Application of Evidence Code Section 1360 is not limited based upon the specific offenses enumerated in Section 1360(c). 		statutory_interpretation 4DCA/2 Mar. 25, 2020
In re B.E.
Reunification bypass provision intended for parents who refuse to participate in court-ordered drug treatment program, not parents who relapse on road to recovery. 		Dependency 4DCA/3 Mar. 25, 2020
City of Warren Police and Fire Retirement System v. Natera Inc.
Plaintiffs failed to allege a securities fraud cause action in violation of Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1993. 		Securities 1DCA/2 Mar. 25, 2020
Uber Technologies Pricing Cases
Uber was exempt from Unfair Practices Act claim because California Public Utilities Commission had jurisdiction over it. 		statutory_interpretation 1DCA/1 Mar. 25, 2020
Citizens for Responsible etc. v. Department of Transportation
Streets and Highways Code Section 103 did not exempt Caltrans from California Environmental Quality Act's requirements. 		statutory_interpretation 4DCA/1 Mar. 25, 2020
Reeve v. Meleyco
Referral fee agreement between attorneys was unenforceable because the client did not provide written consent. 		Contracts 3DCA Mar. 25, 2020
Tresona Multimedia v. Burbank High School Vocal Music Association
Defense of fair use applied due to limited and transformative nature of the use and work's nonprofit educational purposes. 		Copyright 9th Mar. 25, 2020
Citizens For Free Speech v. County of Alameda
District court was correct in invoking abstention under 'Younger v. Harris' doctrine because abatement proceeding met required elements. 		Civil Rights 9th Mar. 25, 2020
Guerrero-Lasprilla v. Barr
INA's Limited Review Provision's phrase 'questions of law' includes the application of legal standard to undisputed or established facts. 		Immigration USSC Mar. 24, 2020
Allen v. Cooper
The Intellectual Property Clause did not allow Congress to abrogate sovereign immunity from copyright suits. 		Copyright USSC Mar. 24, 2020
Kahler v. Kansas
Due process did not require Kansas to adopt moral incapacity test because insanity defenses are state governance and no particular version is required. 		statutory_interpretation USSC Mar. 24, 2020
Comcast Corp. v. National Assn. of African-American Owned Media
A 42 U.S.C. Section 1981 plaintiff continuously bears the burden of showing that plaintiff's race was a 'but-for' cause of its injury. 		Torts USSC Mar. 24, 2020
Davis v. U.S.
Courts may conduct a plain error review of unpreserved arguments, including unpreserved factual arguments. 		Criminal Law and Procedure USSC Mar. 24, 2020
Avery v. US
Order 		USSC Mar. 24, 2020
In re Andrew M.
Incarcerated parents may waive their appearance, but juvenile court may only adjudicate petition if that parent has representation at the hearing. 		Juveniles 2DCA/3 Mar. 24, 2020
Medical Marijuana, Inc. v. ProjectCBD.com
Trial court erred in denying defendant's anti-SLAPP motion because plaintiffs had not demonstrated a probability in prevailing on their libel claim. 		Anti-SLAPP 4DCA/1 Mar. 24, 2020
People v. Bullard
Penal Code Section 10851 violations do not bar Proposition 47 relief merely because one cannot prove intent to indefinitely deprive the owner. 		Criminal Law and Procedure CASC Mar. 24, 2020
Bazan v. U.S.
Order 		USSC Mar. 24, 2020
Bazan v. U.S.
Order 		USSC Mar. 24, 2020
In Re Brown
Funds that were fraudulently transferred by the debtor remained property of the converted estate under 11 U.S.C. Section 348(f)(1)(A). 		Bankruptcy 9th Mar. 24, 2020
Walker v. Life Insurance Company of the Southwest
The district court did not err in granting class certification order because the district court's reliance in 'Briseno' did not cause legal error. 		Civil Procedure 9th Mar. 24, 2020
Winter v. Gardens Regional Hospital and Medical Center
To be actionable under the False Claim Act, clinical judgments and opinions do not require objective falsehood. 		Torts 9th Mar. 24, 2020
U.S. v. Walker
Corporal Injury to Spouse or Cohabitant convictions qualify as violent felonies under Armed Career Criminal Act. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 9th Mar. 23, 2020
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.