| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
S076454
|
Peatros v. Bank of America NT & SA
Federal banking act preempts the state's Fair Employment Housing Act to the extent the laws conflict. |
Banking |
|
Feb. 3, 2000 | |
|
E023875
|
Thomas v. Department of Corrections
Adverse employment actions require material change in employment terms, cognizable impairment of employment, or employment injury. |
Employment Law |
|
Feb. 3, 2000 | |
|
E023875
|
Thomas v. Department of Corrections
Adverse employment actions require material change in employment terms, cognizable impairment of employment, or employment injury. |
Employment Law |
|
Feb. 3, 2000 | |
|
S057324
|
Wells Fargo Bank N. A. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County
Beneficiaries of private express trust are not entitled to privileged communications between trustee and attorney. |
Probate and Trusts |
|
Feb. 3, 2000 | |
|
G021627
|
People v. Anderson
In second degree murder charge, mother's failure to care for child after unassisted birth is not per se implied malice. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 3, 2000 | |
|
S080478
|
Local 535 Service Employees International Union v. City and County of San Francisco
Order |
|
Feb. 3, 2000 | ||
|
S081374
|
Tandberg v. California Pacific Medical Center
Order |
|
Feb. 3, 2000 | ||
|
S083829
|
Woodard v. Commercial Union Insurance Company
Order |
|
Feb. 3, 2000 | ||
|
S084378
|
Insurance Commissioner of the State of California v. Golden Eagle Insurance Co. (Zurich Insurance Company)
Order |
|
Feb. 3, 2000 | ||
|
98-963
|
Nixon v. Shrink Missouri Government PAC
Missouri statute limiting campaign contributions to candidates for state office does not violate First Amendment. |
Government |
|
Feb. 2, 2000 | |
|
98-2341
|
Kirby v. Cyprus Amax Minerals Co.
Order |
Labor Law |
|
Feb. 2, 2000 | |
|
98-8054 and 98-8092
|
Questar Pipeline Co. v. Grynberg
Court may not reduce jury award in case involving take-or-pay gas purchase agreements, where evidence supports jury's calculation of damages. |
Contracts |
|
Feb. 2, 2000 | |
|
98-6085
|
Barnes v. Scott
Amendment prescribing intermediate alternative punishment for crime, which is enacted and applied to accused after commission of crime, isn't ex post facto law. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 2, 2000 | |
|
99-1007 and 99-1065
|
Horseback Inc. v. Tabet
Order |
Real Property |
|
Feb. 2, 2000 | |
|
99-4018
|
U.S. v. Galindo-Martinez
Order |
Immigration |
|
Feb. 2, 2000 | |
|
99-6049
|
U.S. v. Arceneaux
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 2, 2000 | |
|
97-8127,98-8000,98-8007,98-8008,98,8009,and 98-8011
|
Wyoming Farm Bureau Federation v. Babbitt
Department of Interior rule that prescribes release of nonnative wolves into designated experimental areas does not contravene Endangered Species Act. |
Environmental Law |
|
Feb. 1, 2000 | |
|
99-3125, 99-3129 and 99-3143
|
Ward v. Booker
Bureau of Prisons rule, that deems nonviolent offenders whose crimes involve firearms ineligible for sentence reductions, is invalid. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 1, 2000 | |
|
99-1403
|
Alejo v. Gonzalez
Order |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Feb. 1, 2000 | |
|
98-2270
|
Litteral v. Williams
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 1, 2000 | |
|
98-8062
|
Paumer v. Crown Cork and Seal Co. Inc.
Order |
Employment Law |
|
Feb. 1, 2000 | |
|
99-2117
|
Dabbs v. Apfel
Order |
Insurance |
|
Feb. 1, 2000 | |
|
99-1335
|
Jenkins v. Denver County Jail
Order |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Feb. 1, 2000 | |
|
99-6256
|
Delossantos v. Murdock
Order |
Employment Law |
|
Feb. 1, 2000 | |
|
99-6253
|
Starnes v. Gibson
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 1, 2000 | |
|
99-1330
|
Joseph v. Atherton
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 1, 2000 | |
|
97-55382
|
Hill v. Blind Industries and Services of Maryland
Federal litigant cannot wait until opening day of trial to assert immunity under Eleventh Amendment. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jan. 31, 2000 | |
|
97-56182
|
Kleve v. Hill
Order |
|
Jan. 31, 2000 | ||
|
99-6723
|
Bryan v. Moore
Order |
|
Jan. 31, 2000 | ||
|
A084205
|
Mac v. Bank of America
One-year limitation period doesn't preclude administrator of estate from filing complaint against bank who honored forged checks from decedent's account. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jan. 28, 2000 |