This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court

Name Category Published
May v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Order
Prisoners Rights May 24, 2000
Sims v. The Boeing Co.
Order
Employment Law May 24, 2000
Bey v. Keating
Order
Criminal Law and Procedure May 24, 2000
Cross v. Cross
Order
Torts May 24, 2000
Gallegos v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Order
Employment Law May 24, 2000
Whitetree v. Apfel
Order
Employment Law May 24, 2000
Szymanski v. Bufalino
Order
Criminal Law and Procedure May 24, 2000
In re Cleland
Sanction for knowingly misappropriating client funds is disbarment unless extenuating circumstances are present.
Attorneys May 24, 2000
Public Lands Council v. Babbitt
Regulatory change permitting those not engaged in livestock business to qualify for grazing permits doesn't violate statute.
Government May 24, 2000
Johnson v. U.S.
District court has authority to order terms of release following reimprisonment.
Criminal Law and Procedure May 24, 2000
Rosquist v. McCann
Order
May 22, 2000
Pennsylvania v. D.M.
Order
May 22, 2000
Lucero L., a Minor
Hearsay statements in social study of minor may be admitted but may not be sole basis for jurisdictional finding.
Juveniles May 22, 2000
U.S. v. Olafson
Court may admit hearsay statement and isn't required to allow phone depositions even though it would've avoided safety and administrative concerns.
Immigration May 22, 2000
Massoud v. Goldberger & Co. (In re Massoud)
Court can't review factual finding for clear error where entire transcript, and other relevant evidence considered by bankruptcy court, is not furnished.
Bankruptcy May 19, 2000
Pioneer Liquidating Corp. v. United States Trustee (In re Consolidated Pioneer Mortgage Entities)
Case properly converted where party demonstrates unreasonable delay in accomplishing plan goals and fails to recognize duty to provide adequate accountings.
Bankruptcy May 19, 2000
Wolf v. Salven (In re Wolf)
Debtor is not allowed exemption rights beyond those existing under California law at the time he filed his petition.
Bankruptcy May 19, 2000
Curry v. Castillo (In re Castillo)
Trustee and staff are entitled to quasi-judicial immunity where they performed judicial function that required the exercise of discretionary judgment.
Bankruptcy May 19, 2000
Drysdale v. Educational Credit Management Corp. (In re Drysdale)
Debtor's argument that court erred in retroactively applying judicial decisions is irrelevant where no controlling authority exists.
Bankruptcy May 19, 2000
Melvin J., a Minor
Order
May 19, 2000
Morgan v. Alexander
Order
May 18, 2000
City of Pleasanton v. Oetman
Order
May 18, 2000
Sandhu v. Westlake Bay Homeowners Assoc.
Order
May 18, 2000
Killough v. City and County of San Francisco
Order
May 18, 2000
Ricardo A., a Minor
Dagger is substantially concealed when it looks like pen and its point is concealed behind juvenile's ear.
Juveniles May 18, 2000
Javon G., a Minor
Order
May 18, 2000
Arnett v. California Public Employees' Retirement
Order
May 17, 2000
U.S. v. Clinger
Order
Taxation May 17, 2000
Park Central Mall LLC v. Maricopa County
Assessor relying upon assessment correction procedures to correct valuation error must meet limitations schedule established in statute.
Taxation May 17, 2000
U.S. v. Pearson
Sentencing enhancement for robbery and separate conduct of restraining individual during robbery is proper despite conviction for possession of firearm.
Criminal Law and Procedure May 17, 2000