| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 
 09-55632 
 | 
New Mexico State Investment Council v. Ernst & Young LLP
 In securities fraud action, specific allegations of auditor’s failure to investigate documentation relating to company’s large grant of options support adequate pleading of scienter.  | 
Securities | 
 | 
Apr. 14, 2011 | |
| 
 08-16745 
 | 
The Facebook Inc. v. Pacific Northwest Software Inc.
 Settlement agreement is enforceable against unknown securities claims, where sophisticated parties engaged in extensive discovery regarding company’s value.  | 
Securities | 
 | 
Apr. 11, 2011 | |
| 
 09-1156 
 | 
Matrixx Initiatives Inc. v. Siracusano
 Materiality element of securities fraud allegation is determined by whether undisclosed fact would alter total mix of information available to reasonable investor.  | 
Securities | 
 | 
Mar. 23, 2011 | |
| 
 07-74647 
 | 
Sacks v. SEC
 SEC errs in adopting rule that retroactively prohibits individuals who have been banned from securities industry from representing parties in securities-related arbitration.  | 
Securities | 
 | 
Feb. 23, 2011 | |
| 
 09-35262 
 | 
Simmonds v. Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC
 Court properly dismisses shareholder’s derivative action where shareholder failed to send adequate demand letter to corporation identifying alleged wrongdoing.  | 
Securities | 
 | 
Jan. 19, 2011 | |
| 
 D055209 
 | 
Viterbi v. Wasserman
 Remedy of rescission in securities fraud claim requires privity of contract between plaintiff and defendant.  | 
Securities | 
 | 
Jan. 11, 2011 | |
| 
 09-35262 
 | 
Simmonds v. Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC
 Court properly dismisses shareholder’s derivative action where shareholder failed to send adequate demand letter to corporation identifying alleged wrongdoing.  | 
Securities | 
 | 
Dec. 2, 2010 | |
| 
 07-56542 
 | 
SEC v. Platforms Wireless International Corp.
 Company is not exempt from security registration requirement where company issuing securities is under common control of company selling securities to public.  | 
Securities | 
 | 
Aug. 17, 2010 | |
| 
 07-56542 
 | 
SEC v. Platforms Wireless International Corp.
 Company is not exempt from security registration requirement where company issuing securities is under common control of company selling securities to public.  | 
Securities | 
 | 
Jul. 28, 2010 | |
| 
 08-17627 
 | 
Hamilton v. Conners
 Forward-looking revenue projections, accompanied by cautionary language, are protected from securities violations under Private Securities Litigation Reform Act.  | 
Securities | 
 | 
Jul. 1, 2010 | |
| 
 08-1191 
 | 
Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd.
 Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 Section 10(b) does not have extraterritorial application absent clear contrary legislative intent.  | 
Securities | 
 | 
Jun. 25, 2010 | |
| 
 08-74943 
 | 
Gebhart v. SEC
 SEC properly considers objective unreasonableness of actions in determining whether defendant acted with conscious recklessness in making false statements.  | 
Securities | 
 | 
Feb. 17, 2010 | |
| 
 B211501 
 | 
Ho v. Hsieh
 Trial court abuses discretion when it transfers debtor’s valueless stock to creditor to enforce money judgment.  | 
Securities | 
 | 
Jan. 27, 2010 | |
| 
 06-15677 
 | 
Siracusano v. Matrixx Initiatives Inc.
 Complaint sufficiently establishes scienter by alleging that defendant knew of material information regarding product's risks and issued press statements asserting product’s viability.  | 
Securities | 
 | 
Oct. 28, 2009 | |
| 
 05-10004 
 | 
U.S. v. Hickey
 For mail and securities fraud, expert witness properly precluded from testifying that defendant's investment scheme could be profitable.  | 
Securities | 
 | 
Sep. 3, 2009 | |
| 
 08-55081 
 | 
Desai v. Deutsche Bank Securities Limited
 Class certification in securities fraud case denied where plaintiffs could not show 'class-wide' reliance to establish predominance of common issues.  | 
Securities | 
 | 
Jul. 30, 2009 | |
| 
 07-15586 
 | 
Warfield v. Alaniz
 Charitable gift annuities sold under Ponzi scheme are considered investment contracts subject to federal securities law.  | 
Securities | 
 | 
Jun. 25, 2009 | |
| 
 07-15083 
 | 
Rubke v. Capitol Bancorp Ltd.
 Minority shareholders do not allege fraud with sufficient particularity to withstand dismissal for failure to meet pleading standards of Rule 9(b).  | 
Securities | 
 | 
Jan. 13, 2009 | |
| 
 05-55072 
 | 
Betker v. U.S. Trust Corp.
 Bar orders issued by district court are vacated where they do not pass muster under Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.  | 
Securities | 
 | 
Oct. 2, 2008 | |
| 
 06-35511 
 | 
South Ferry v. Killinger
 Reviewing court must consider totality of circumstances in determining whether defendants' imputed knowledge of 'core operations' satisfies heightened pleading standard.  | 
Securities | 
 | 
Sep. 10, 2008 | |
| 
 06-55826 
 | 
Metzler Investment GMBH v. Corinthian Colleges Inc.
 In federal securities fraud class action, plaintiff's complaint fails to meet pleading requirements.  | 
Securities | 
 | 
Aug. 27, 2008 | |
| 
 06-16088 
 | 
Whistler Invstments Inc. v. Depository Trust and Clearing Corp.
 Securities Exchange Act preempts state-law claims against registered clearing agencies in connection with SEC-approved services.  | 
Securities | 
 | 
Aug. 25, 2008 | |
| 
 06-16185 
 | 
Hartman v. Gilead Sciences Inc.
 Investors sufficiently allege loss causation where FDA's warning letter causes drug company's publicly traded securities to drop in price .  | 
Securities | 
 | 
Aug. 12, 2008 | |
| 
 06-15165 
 | 
SEC v. M&A West Inc.
 Defendant violates Section 5 of Securities Act of 1933 where he participates in reverse mergers and sells unregistered shares to public.  | 
Securities | 
 | 
Aug. 12, 2008 | |
| 
 06-30100 
 | 
U.S. v. Stringer
 In parallel criminal proceeding, government may use evidence SEC received in course of civil investigation without violating due process.  | 
Securities | 
 | 
Aug. 1, 2008 | |
| 
 06-55826 
 | 
Metzler Investment GMBH v. Corinthian Colleges Inc.
 In federal securities fraud class action, plaintiff's complaint fails to meet pleading requirements.  | 
Securities | 
 | 
Jul. 29, 2008 | |
| 
 08-55865 
 | 
Luther v. Countrywide Home Loans Servicing
 Class Action Fairness Act does not trump Security Act of 1933 Section 22(a)'s bar on removal.  | 
Securities | 
 | 
Jul. 18, 2008 | |
| 
 06-55937 
 | 
Rick-Mik Enterprises Inc. v. Equilon Enterprises LLC
 Franchisees who do not allege market power and credit card processing services distinct from gasoline franchise fail to state antitrust claim.  | 
Securities | 
 | 
Jul. 14, 2008 | |
| 
 06-55544 
 | 
Donell v. Kowell
 Innocent investor in Ponzi scheme is required to disgorge profits as fraudulent transfers pursuant to Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act.  | 
Securities | 
 | 
Jul. 2, 2008 | |
| 
 07-210 
 | 
Bridge v. Phoenix Bond & Indemnity Co.
 Plaintiff asserting claim predicated on mail fraud under Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act is not required to show first-party reliance.  | 
Securities | 
 | 
Jun. 10, 2008 | 
