| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 
 19-35119 
 | 
Bean v. Matteucci
 District court erred in denying petitioner's habeas petition based on 'Younger v. Harris' abstention grounds because irreparable harm exception applied.  | 
Prisoners' Rights | 
 | 
R. Paez | Jan. 21, 2021 | 
| 
 08-99024 
 | 
Hooper v. Shinn
 Arizona Supreme Court did not unreasonably apply clearly established law in concluding that defendant failed to show that disclosure of witness benefits violated defendant's due process rights.  | 
Prisoners' Rights | 
 | 
M. Bennett | Jan. 11, 2021 | 
| 
 19-70036 
 | 
Christian v. Thomas
 United States Supreme Court decision in 'McCoy v. Louisiana' has not been made to apply retroactively to cases on collateral review.  | 
Prisoners' Rights | 
 | 
C. Bea | Dec. 15, 2020 | 
| 
 A160122 
 | 
In re Von Staich 
 California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation acted with deliberate indifference to the risk of petitioner contracting COVID-19 by failing to implement measures to permit physical distancing between inmates.  | 
Prisoners' Rights | 
 | 
J. Kline | Oct. 22, 2020 | 
| 
 19-70365 
 | 
Chades v. Hill
 Petitioner's application for leave to file a second or successive habeas corpus petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 2244(b)(1) was denied.  | 
Prisoners' Rights | 
 | 
J. Bybee | Oct. 1, 2020 | 
| 
 C087151 
 | 
In re Hampton
 Where appellate counsel fails to raise significant and obvious issue, failure will generally be considered deficient performance.  | 
Prisoners' Rights | 
 | 
A. Hoch | May 4, 2020 | 
| 
 17-15603 
 | 
May v. Ryan
 Petitioner's lawyer did not render ineffective assistance by failing to object to resumption of jury deliberations after trial court declared mistrial.  | 
Prisoners' Rights | 
 | 
M. Friedland | Mar. 30, 2020 | 
| 
 19-55213 
 | 
Milam v. Harrington
 District court erred by refusing to consider petitioner's mental impairment as cause of untimely filing of habeas petition simply because he was represented by counsel.  | 
Prisoners' Rights | 
 | 
A. Hurwitz | Mar. 26, 2020 | 
| 
 16-55083 
 | 
Harris v. Harris
 Dismissals for refusal to exercise supplemental jurisdiction, failure to serve, and quasi-judicial immunity are not grounds giving rise to strikes under the Prison Litigation Reform Act.  | 
Prisoners' Rights | 
 | 
J. Nguyen | Aug. 22, 2019 | 
| 
 F075680 
 | 
In re Rigsby 
 A prisoner possesses items in his cell when he has knowledge of the items and the items are located in an area accessible to all prisoners residing in that cell.  | 
Prisoners' Rights | 
 | 
R. Peña | Aug. 21, 2019 | 
| 
 16-56845 
 | 
Valdez v. Montgomery
 Supreme Court 60-day 'benchmark' excludes equitable tolling for habeas petitioner who could not show 'good cause' for waiting year between filing state habeas petitions.  | 
Prisoners' Rights | 
 | 
R. Gould | Mar. 15, 2019 | 
| 
 16-99007 
 | 
Hurles v. Ryan
 Intervening Supreme Court authority that ineffective assistance of appellate counsel cannot excuse procedural default of habeas claim renders petitioner's claim unviable.  | 
Prisoners' Rights | 
 | 
P. Curiam (9th Cir.) | Feb. 4, 2019 | 
| 
 16-56051 
 | 
Shorter v. Baca
 Judgment reversed and remanded where defendant is entitled to new trial because evidence failed to show that defendant received requisite procedural forms to challenge mental health classification.  | 
Prisoners' Rights | 
 | 
K. Wardlaw | Jul. 17, 2018 | 
| 
 16-15832 
 | 
Tamplin v. Muniz
 Sixth Amendment violation 'complete' when trial court denies defendant's request to represent himself; such violation not cured by subsequent 'acquiescence' of defendant.  | 
Prisoners' Rights | 
 | 
W. Fletcher | Jul. 9, 2018 | 
| 
 B286056 
 | 
In re Jenson 
 Penal Code Section 3051, created by Senate Bill 260 and ensuring meaningful change at parole release for youth offenders, supersedes competing section requiring application of in-prison offense terms.  | 
Prisoners' Rights | 
 | 
H. Dhanidina | Jun. 8, 2018 | 
| 
 16-15597 
 | 
Fuqua v. Ryan
 Prison inmate who brings action relating to prison's conditions under federal law exhausts administrative remedies by engaging in and completing prison's disciplinary appeal process.  | 
Prisoners' Rights | 
 | 
M. Christen | May 21, 2018 | 
| 
 16-15497 
 | 
Soto v. Unknown Sweetman
 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 claim accrues when plaintiff knows or has reason to know of the injury that forms the basis of the action.  | 
Prisoners' Rights | 
 | 
L. Rosenthal | Feb. 12, 2018 | 
| 
 13-35311 
 | 
Vega v. U.S.
 Dismissal of new Bivens claims alleging that private defendants violated constitutional rights of plaintiff affirmed where plaintiff has alternative remedies.  | 
Prisoners' Rights | 
 | 
R. Tallman | Feb. 8, 2018 | 
| 
 F071466 
 | 
In re Robinson
 Civil detainees not entitled to return of confiscated contraband, particular where it is confiscated for safety concerns.  | 
Prisoners' Rights | 
 | 
R. Peña | Jan. 11, 2018 | 
| 
 17-6075 
 | 
Tharpe v. Sellers
 Racist statements by juror in sworn affidavit mandates reconsideration of whether juror's presence prejudiced murder defendant.  | 
Prisoners' Rights | 
 | 
P. Curiam (USSC) | Jan. 9, 2018 | 
| 
 12-99004 
 | 
Rowland v. Chappell
 Tardy retention of expert during penalty phase constitutes deficient assistance of trial counsel but does not warrant reversal of convictions in absence of prejudice.  | 
Prisoners' Rights | 
 | 
J. Owens | Dec. 7, 2017 | 
| 
 16-30143 
 | 
U.S. v. Brown
 In issue of first impression, inmate serving federal sentence remains under 'custody of the Attorney General' when he is held at state-run institution pursuant to writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum.  | 
Prisoners' Rights | 
 | 
K. Lipez | Nov. 22, 2017 | 
| 
 15-15259 
 | 
Williams v. King
 Magistrate judge erroneously dismisses civil rights complaint where not all named parties in complaint consented to have case be decided by magistrate.  | 
Prisoners' Rights | 
 | 
N. Smith | Nov. 10, 2017 | 
| 
  10-99009  
 | 
Sanders v. Cullen
 Defendant convicted of first-degree murders stemming from 1980 robbery unsuccessful in obtaining relief from denial of petition of writ of habeas corpus.  | 
Prisoners' Rights | 
 | 
M. Christen | Oct. 16, 2017 | 
| 
 14-99001 
 | 
Kirkpatrick v. Chappell
 Order finding that habeas petitioner waived claims vacated where evidence fails to show that habeas petitioner did so 'knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently.'  | 
Prisoners' Rights | 
 | 
S. Reinhardt | Oct. 11, 2017 | 
| 
 14-35053 
 | 
Entler v. Gregoire 
 Prisoner's First Amendment retaliation claims are actionable where Prisoner's threats to sue are protected under the First Amendment.  | 
Prisoners' Rights | 
 | 
F. Block | Oct. 9, 2017 | 
| 
 15-15547 
 | 
Jackson v. Fong
 Plaintiff who was a prisoner at time he filed suit but who was not a prisoner at time of his operative complaint is not subject to exhaustion defense.  | 
Prisoners' Rights | 
 | 
M. Murguia | Sep. 1, 2017 | 
| 
 09-99012 
 | 
Andrews v. Davis
 In superseding opinion Ninth Circuit again rejects habeas prisoner's ineffective assistance of counsel claim, resulting in reversal of district court’s grant of relief on that issue.  | 
Prisoners' Rights | 
 | 
S. Ikuta | Aug. 2, 2017 | 
| 
 09-99022 
 | 
Clabourne v. Ryan
 Order  | 
Prisoners' Rights | 
 | 
Aug. 2, 2017 | |
| 
 15-15054 
 | 
Harris v. Mangum
 Court properly declined to evaluate pro se inmate’s competence where inmate had no interest in litigation that could have been protected by requested appointment.  | 
Prisoners' Rights | 
 | 
R. Clifton | Jul. 19, 2017 | 
