Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
02-70259
|
Zazueta-Carrillo v. Ashcroft
Under new immigration laws, voluntary departure period begins when Board of Immigration Appeals enters its order. |
Immigration |
|
Mar. 26, 2003 | |
01-71717
|
Guzman v. INS
Board of Immigration Appeals improperly denied petitioner's motion to remand to Immigration Court so he could apply for adjustment of status. |
Immigration |
|
Mar. 24, 2003 | |
90-70474
|
Antonio-Martinez v. INS
Fugitive disentitlement doctrine applies to alien whose whereabouts become unknown while his petition for review of a deportation order is pending. |
Immigration |
|
Mar. 24, 2003 | |
01-71537
|
Salta v. INS
Board of Immigration Appeals abused its discretion when applying evidentiary requirements of certified mail receipt to regular mail delivery. |
Immigration |
|
Mar. 21, 2003 | |
01-57021
|
Zegarra-Gomez v. INS
Deportation subsequent to filing of habeas petition does not moot petition. |
Immigration |
|
Mar. 21, 2003 | |
01-71463
|
Singh v. INS
Immigration board was not required to mail notice to attorney who failed to file notice of appearance on behalf of client. |
Immigration |
|
Mar. 21, 2003 | |
01-71827
|
Vasquez-Lopez v. Ashcroft
Voluntary departure of illegal alien constituted break in continued physical presence. |
Immigration |
|
Mar. 21, 2003 | |
02-10157
|
U.S. v. Luna-Madellaga
Defendant, convicted of unlawful re-entry of deported alien, is subject to enhancement that applies to removal made pursuant to reinstated order. |
Immigration |
|
Mar. 21, 2003 | |
01-50703
|
U.S. v. Lopez-Garcia
Sentencing enhancement was wrongly imposed upon alien smuggler who was found to have recklessly created substantial risk of danger to another. |
Immigration |
|
Mar. 21, 2003 | |
02-71549
|
U.S. v. U.S. District Court (Chavez-Orozco)
Jury may not consider whether withdrawn citizenship application would qualify alien as 'U.S. national.' |
Immigration |
|
Mar. 21, 2003 | |
02-70028
|
Valencia-Fragoso v. INS
Alien who appeared late for hearing cannot challenge removal order. |
Immigration |
|
Mar. 18, 2003 | |
00-70157
|
Li v. Ashcroft
Chinese immigrant, alleging persecution for resisting coercive family planning practices, is not entitled to asylum nor withholding of removal. |
Immigration |
|
Feb. 18, 2003 | |
01-35626
|
Chang v. INS
Legal permanent resident who tried to cash counterfeit check was not removable as aggravated felon. |
Immigration |
|
Jan. 15, 2003 | |
00-70583
|
Ison v. INS
Alien is permitted to make simultaneous filing of petition for immigrant visa and application for adjustment of status. |
Immigration |
|
Jan. 15, 2003 | |
00-50543
|
U.S. v. Gonzalez-Torres
Alien who was under constant surveillance by border patrol agents is not guilty of illegal entry. |
Immigration |
|
Jan. 15, 2003 | |
01-71568
|
Espejo v. INS
Alien who fraudulently obtained exchange visa is still subject to visa's foreign residency requirement. |
Immigration |
|
Jan. 15, 2003 | |
01-71423
|
Cano-Merida v. INS
Asylum petitioner was denied due process by Immigration Judge's failure to give him a meaningful opportunity to present his case. |
Immigration |
|
Jan. 15, 2003 | |
01-56784
|
Doan v. INS
Bond requirement as condition of release is permitted where statute authorizing terms of supervision does not exclude such condition. |
Immigration |
|
Jan. 14, 2003 | |
01-71266
|
Dobrota v. INS
INS arbitrarily denied motion to appeal deportation hearing where notice efforts were not reasonably calculated to reach appellant. |
Immigration |
|
Jan. 14, 2003 | |
99-50041
|
U.S. v. Hovsepian
Court improperly expunged terrorist convictions of resident aliens seeking naturalization. |
Immigration |
|
Dec. 15, 2002 | |
02-29
|
INS v. Ventura
Court of appeals should have remanded immigration case to Board of Immigration Appeals to consider changed circumstances of Guatemala. |
Immigration |
|
Dec. 10, 2002 | |
99-71004
|
Ventura v. INS
Petitioner is entitled to withholding of deportation and is eligible for asylum because INS failed to rebut presumption of fear of future persecution. |
Immigration |
|
Dec. 9, 2002 | |
01-16225
|
Servin-Espinoza v. Ashcroft
Immigration policy that provided discretionary relief to excludable aliens but not deportable aliens violated equal protection requirement. |
Immigration |
|
Nov. 12, 2002 | |
01-50064
|
U.S. v. Velasco-Medina
Alien is guilty of illegal reentry after deportation despite defect in indictment. |
Immigration |
|
Nov. 12, 2002 | |
01-70846
|
Abassi v. INS
When pro se litigant refers in motion to 'recent Country Reports,' Board of Immigration Appeals must consider most recent relevant country condition profile. |
Immigration |
|
Nov. 12, 2002 | |
99-70322
|
Ekimian v. INS
Circuit court lacks jurisdiction to review Board of Immigration Appeal's decision not to reopen proceeding sua sponte. |
Immigration |
|
Nov. 10, 2002 | |
01-10291
|
U.S. v. Leos-Maldonado
Defective indictment that failed to allege specific intent to enter without authorization is not prejudicial. |
Immigration |
|
Oct. 29, 2002 | |
00-70595
|
Pazcoguin v. Radcliffe
Citizen of Philippines who admitted essential elements of controlled substance violation is excludable from United States. |
Immigration |
|
Oct. 25, 2002 | |
01-70599
|
Fajardo v. INS
Limitation period of 180 days for filing motions to reopen absentia deportation proceedings based on 'exceptional circumstances' is tolled. |
Immigration |
|
Oct. 16, 2002 | |
00-71558
|
Casas-Chavez v. INS
Specificity requirement is satisfied despite alien's failure to file brief as long as sufficient notice is conveyed to Board of Immigration Appeals. |
Immigration |
|
Oct. 16, 2002 |