For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Read Today's Digital Edition
Place Your Legal Notices
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court

Name Category Published
Cleveland National Forest Foundation v. San Diego Association of Governments
Environmental impact report that failed to analyze inconsistency between state’s greenhouse gas emissions reduction goals and proposed plan’s emissions impacts violates CEQA. 		Environmental Law Nov. 25, 2014
Engine Manufacturers Association v. California Air Resources Board
California Air Resources Board may regulate testing for in-use heavy-duty engine, designed to reduce air pollution caused by motor vehicle emissions. 		Environmental Law Nov. 25, 2014
Sierra Club v. County of San Diego
San Diego’s climate action plan violates CEQA for failing to comply with previously adopted mitigation measures requiring detailed deadlines and enforceable measures. 		Environmental Law Nov. 25, 2014
Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture
Group has standing to assert Endangered Species Act claims challenging alleged harassment of protected grizzly bears via helicopter hazing of Yellowstone bison. 		Environmental Law Nov. 20, 2014
Saltonstall v. City of Sacramento (Sacramento Basketball Holdings LLC)
Statute that modified deadlines for environmental review of new Sacramento Kings sports arena project under CEQA does not violate separation of powers doctrine. 		Environmental Law Nov. 20, 2014
Shell Gulf of Mexico Inc. v. Center for Biological Diversity Inc.
Shell may not sue environmental groups, who it believed would likely challenge agency's approval of oil spill response plans related to oil exploration on Arctic coast. 		Environmental Law Nov. 12, 2014
Paulek v. California Dept. of Water Resources
California Dept. of Water Resources' removal of emergency outlet extension from dam project is not a significant environmental impact, given flood danger already existed. 		Environmental Law Nov. 2, 2014
Natural Resources Defense Council Inc. v. U.S. Dept. of Transportation
Approval of planned expressway connecting Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach to I-405 freeway does not violate Clean Air Act. 		Environmental Law Oct. 30, 2014
Friends of the Eel River v. North Coast Railroad Authority (Northwestern Pacific Railroad Co.)
North Coast Railroad Authority project for resuming railroad line is not subject to CEQA, due to preemption by Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act. 		Environmental Law Oct. 20, 2014
Coalition for Adequate Review v. City and County of San Francisco
After winning CEQA case, city may recover costs incurred in preparing supplemental record of proceedings, even where petitioners chose to prepare record themselves. 		Environmental Law Oct. 15, 2014
Sturgeon v. Masica
Federal regulation prohibiting use of hovercrafts on waters in national parks applies to state-owned lands that fall within conservation system units in Alaska. 		Environmental Law Oct. 6, 2014
Friends of the Eel River v. North Coast Railroad Authority (Northwestern Pacific Railroad Co.)
North Coast Railroad Authority project for resuming railroad line is not subject to CEQA, due to preemption by Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act. 		Environmental Law Sep. 30, 2014
Picayune Rancheria of Chukchansi Indians v. Brown (NP Fresno Land Acquisitions LLC)
Governor Brown’s concurrence with Dept. of Interior’s approval of tribe’s proposed casino in Madera County does not require environmental impact report under CEQA. 		Environmental Law Sep. 24, 2014
Friends of the Wild Swan v. Weber
Group fails to preliminarily prevent logging projects in Montana's Flathead National Forest where their cumulative impacts would not cause imminent injury. 		Environmental Law Sep. 24, 2014
The Boeing Co. v. Movassaghi
California’s Senate Bill 900, which prescribes cleanup standards for radioactive contamination at Santa Susana Field Laboratory, invalidly regulates federal government. 		Environmental Law Sep. 21, 2014
United States v. The Coeur D’Alenes Co.
District court need not consider potentially responsible parties' degree of fault in approving consent decree, based on ability to pay, for recovery of cleanup costs. 		Environmental Law Sep. 16, 2014
Coalition for Adequate Review v. City and County of San Francisco
After winning CEQA case, city may recover costs incurred in preparing supplemental record of proceedings, even where petitioners chose to prepare record themselves. 		Environmental Law Sep. 15, 2014
Montana Environmental Information Center v. Stone-Manning
Environmental groups may not sue Montana official regarding anticipated approval of pending mining permits, despite alleged history of improper approvals. 		Environmental Law Sep. 11, 2014
Rominger v. County of Colusa (Adams Group Inc.)
County may argue developer’s proposed subdivision is not a project for purposes of CEQA's requirements, even though it approved a mitigated negative declaration. 		Environmental Law Sep. 9, 2014
Alaska Community Action on Toxics v. Aurora Energy Services LLC
General permit for stormwater discharges does not shield coal loading facility from Clean Water Act liability based on discharges of coal into bay. 		Environmental Law Sep. 3, 2014
Citizens for the Restoration of L Street v. City of Fresno (FFDA Properties LLC)
Although historic preservation commission’s approval of mitigated negative declaration for project violated CEQA, city properly finds no historical resources would be impacted. 		Environmental Law Sep. 1, 2014
ASARCO LLC v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.
Mining company’s amended complaint based on previously excluded facts in CERCLA contribution action is timely, as it related back to date of original complaint. 		Environmental Law Aug. 27, 2014
Center for Community Action and Environmental Justice v. BNSF Railway Co.
Railway companies do not have to stop emissions of diesel particulate matter from railyards, given they do not initially place exhaust onto land or water. 		Environmental Law Aug. 20, 2014
Sierra Club v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Builder of power plant must demonstrate compliance with new environmental regulations in effect when project permit was issued, even if EPA delayed issuance. 		Environmental Law Aug. 12, 2014
Tuolumne Jobs & Small Business Alliance v. Superior Court (Wal-Mart Stores Inc.)
City does not need to conduct full environmental analysis under CEQA after directly adopting voter-sponsored initiative for proposed expansion of Wal-Mart. 		Environmental Law Aug. 7, 2014
State of Arizona v. Ashton Co. Inc.
District court fails to independently scrutinize consent agreements regarding cleanup of Arizona landfill, affording undue deference to Arizona Dept. of Environmental Quality. 		Environmental Law Aug. 3, 2014
People of the State of California ex rel. Imperial County Air Pollution Control District v. U.S. Dept. of the Interior
Secretary of Interior complies with NEPA in approving environmental impact statement regarding effects of water transfer agreements on Salton Sea. 		Environmental Law Aug. 3, 2014
Citizens Opposing a Dangerous Environment v. County of Kern (North Sky River Energy LLC)
County’s approval of wind farm does not violate CEQA because mitigation measure requiring compliance with FAA regulations minimizes air safety hazards. 		Environmental Law Jul. 27, 2014
Town of Atherton v. California High-Speed Rail Authority
California High-Speed Rail Authority properly refuses alternatives to laying track for trains traveling from Central Valley to Bay Area through Pacheco Pass. 		Environmental Law Jul. 24, 2014
WildEarth Guardians v. U.S. EPA
Environmental group loses challenge to EPA’s approval of plan for changes at generating station and to improve visibility conditions in Nevada wilderness area. 		Environmental Law Jul. 17, 2014
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.