Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
07-56599
|
Rutti v. Lojack Corp. Inc.
Employer may have to compensate employees for time spent uploading work data to company database while at home. |
Employment Law |
|
Aug. 25, 2009 | |
04-16546
|
Trustees of the Construction Industry and Laborers Health and Welfare Trust v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co.
Judgment against company serving as surety on 'statutorily required payment bonds' reversed for lack of notice. |
Employment Law |
|
Aug. 25, 2009 | |
07-16903
|
EEOC v. The Boeing Co.
EEOC presents adequate evidence for jury to infer that employer deliberately transferred employee to department where she was likely to fail. |
Employment Law |
|
Aug. 19, 2009 | |
B201171
|
Mueller v. County of Los Angeles
Employer's policy against retaliation does not impose mandatory duty to conduct investigation into employee's complaints of harassment. |
Employment Law |
|
Aug. 17, 2009 | |
07-16597
|
Asdale v. International Game Technology
Former employees of publicly-traded company raise valid claim under whistleblower protection law based on reports of possible shareholder fraud. |
Employment Law |
|
Aug. 14, 2009 | |
05-15454
|
Boucher v. Shaw
Individual officers and managers are liable for unpaid wages under Fair Labor Standards Act despite corporation being bankrupt. |
Employment Law |
|
Aug. 12, 2009 | |
E045200
|
Sanchez v. County of San Bernardino
Confidentiality provision is not void where employer had no duty to disclose circumstances underlying severance agreement. |
Employment Law |
|
Aug. 11, 2009 | |
D053492
|
Sasco Electric v. California Fair Employment and Housing Commission (Scherl)
Employer commits pregnancy discrimination where employee would not have lost her job working on yacht if she had not been pregnant. |
Employment Law |
|
Aug. 10, 2009 | |
07-73028
|
SEIU v. National Labor Relations Board
Union is required to give 10-day notice prior to engaging in collective refusal to work. |
Employment Law |
|
Aug. 4, 2009 | |
B206750
|
California Grocers Association v. City of Los Angeles
City ordinance requiring purchasers of large grocery stores to maintain prior owner's workforce for 90 days is preempted by state law. |
Employment Law |
|
Aug. 3, 2009 | |
D054087
|
Farahani v. San Diego Community College District
Terminated professor entitled to reinstatement where signed agreement containing waiver of appeal rights is null and void. |
Employment Law |
|
Jul. 30, 2009 | |
B210803
|
Lockhart v. MVM, Inc.
Grant of summary judgment is proper where plaintiff's state employment claims were barred by federal enclave doctrine. |
Employment Law |
|
Jul. 28, 2009 | |
08-17369
|
Johnson v. Couturier, Jr.
Preliminary injunction upheld where defendant's inability to reimburse advancement of defense costs constitutes irreparable injury. |
Employment Law |
|
Jul. 28, 2009 | |
07-17177
|
Kraus v. Presidio Trust Facilities Division/Residential Management Branch
Aggrieved federal employee does not fail to exhaust her claims where she contacted employment opportunity officer immediately after incidents of discrimination. |
Employment Law |
|
Jul. 24, 2009 | |
B209863
|
Martorana v. Marlin & Saltzman
Duty owed by class counsel does not require follow-up contact of class member who fails to file timely claim. |
Employment Law |
|
Jul. 20, 2009 | |
08-55409
|
Trustees of the Screen Actors Guild-Producers Pension and Health Plans v. NYCA Inc.
Employment benefit plan cannot recover unpaid contribution from employer who was not party to collective bargaining agreement. |
Employment Law |
|
Jul. 17, 2009 | |
D053391
|
Messenger Courier Association of the Americas v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board
California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board’s decision as to whether employer properly treated workers as independent contractors is entitled to precedential effect. |
Employment Law |
|
Jul. 17, 2009 | |
08-55389
|
Harris v. Amgen Inc.
Former employee who voluntarily withdraws assets from defined contribution plan governed by ERISA has standing to sue. |
Employment Law |
|
Jul. 15, 2009 | |
07-16489
|
Sznewajs v. U.S. Bancorp Amended and Restated Supplemental Benefits Plan
Abuse of discretion standard applies to pension plan administrator's decision to treat second wife as survivor beneficiary. |
Employment Law |
|
Jul. 14, 2009 | |
S157197
|
Hughes v. Pair
Plaintiff alleging sexual harassment in relationship outside workplace must prove that conduct altered employment conditions or amounted to threat of assault. |
Employment Law |
|
Jul. 7, 2009 | |
D053491
|
Chau v. Starbucks Corp.
Starbucks Corporation shift supervisors working on service team with baristas are entitled to portion of collective tip. |
Employment Law |
|
Jul. 7, 2009 | |
G040823
|
Choi v. Orange County Great Park Corp.
Plaintiffs are 'prevailing parties' entitled to attorney fees where property development committee was compelled to produce CEO candidate resumes. |
Employment Law |
|
Jul. 2, 2009 | |
B209863
|
Martorana v. Marlin & Saltzman
Duty owed by class counsel does not require follow-up contact of class member who fails to file timely claim. |
Employment Law |
|
Jul. 2, 2009 | |
C058539
|
Scott v. Phoenix Schools, Inc.
Punitive damages award arising from wrongful termination claim not supported by sufficient evidence of malice or oppression. |
Employment Law |
|
Jul. 2, 2009 | |
E047501
|
Sanders Construction Co. Inc. v. Cerda
General contractor is responsible for unlicensed subcontractor's employees' unpaid wages. |
Employment Law |
|
Jul. 1, 2009 | |
B207719
|
Owen v. Macy's Inc.
Employer lawfully imposes six-month hold on accrual of vacation benefits for new employees and denies compensation for unearned vacation time. |
Employment Law |
|
Jul. 1, 2009 | |
S155965
|
Arias v. Superior Court (Angelo Dairy)
Employee's representative claims alleging violations of unfair competition law are subject to class action requirements. |
Employment Law |
|
Jun. 30, 2009 | |
B205533
|
McConnell v. Innovative Artists Talent and Literary Agency Inc.
Anti-SLAPP motion is improper where writing was not protected First Amendment activity and causes of action arose from defendant's conduct. |
Employment Law |
|
Jun. 26, 2009 | |
08-441
|
Gross v. FBL Financial Services Inc.
'Mixed-motives' instruction never proper in age discrimination suit as claimant must prove that age was 'but-for' cause of adverse employment decision. |
Employment Law |
|
Jun. 19, 2009 | |
B208682
|
Paterson v. City of Los Angeles
Supervisor's 'sick check' of police officer deemed interrogation subject to Public Safety Officers' Bill of Rights Act protection. |
Employment Law |
|
Jun. 17, 2009 |