| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
B296742
|
People v. Ruiz
Immigration advisement that conviction 'may have' deportation consequences is not adequate for defendants charged with serious controlled substance offenses; defendants must be advised they 'will' be deported. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
A. Gilbert | Jun. 8, 2020 |
|
F076908
|
People v. Sanchez
Jury verdict of not guilty of murder did not preclude, on collateral estoppel grounds, second trial on assault on child causing death. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
J. Detjen | Jun. 5, 2020 |
|
B296331
|
People v. Tarkington
If petitioner is ineligible for resentencing under Senate Bill No. 1437, their requested appointment of counsel is not required. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
L. Edmon | Jun. 4, 2020 |
|
18-6943
|
Banister v. Davis
Habeas courts must entertain Rule 59(e) motions as attendant to initial habeas application, rather than dismiss them as successive. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
E. Kagan | Jun. 2, 2020 |
|
A155459
|
People v. Best
Defendant's lack of knowledge of criminal law and courtroom procedure was not a basis to deny the right to self-representation. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
A. Tucher | Jun. 2, 2020 |
|
F076252
|
Modification: People v. Son
Imposing court assessments without first giving defendant opportunity to request ability to pay hearing is unconstitutional. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
M. Smith | Jun. 2, 2020 |
|
A157186
|
People v. Duarte-Lara
'People v. Mayberry' instructions are not warranted unless defendant's mistake of consent was subjectively and objectively reasonable under circumstances. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
I. Petrou | Jun. 1, 2020 |
|
B293030
|
People v. Lima
Although prosecutor improperly argued facts not in evidence during closing argument, misconduct was harmless in light of evidence. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
D. Kim | Jun. 1, 2020 |
|
F076252
|
People v. Son
Imposing court assessments without first giving defendant opportunity to request ability to pay hearing is unconstitutional. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
M. Smith | Jun. 1, 2020 |
|
S086234
|
People v. Miles
Officer summarizing suspect descriptions as similar or possibly matching in affidavit were not intentionally made false statements to obtain warrant. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
J. Groban | May 29, 2020 |
|
E073871
|
In re Smith
'McCoy v. Louisiana' did not apply because defendant did not make an express intent to maintain innocence when counsel informed him about his defense strategy. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
M. Ramirez | May 28, 2020 |
|
F076580
|
People v. Machuca
Conviction for driving under the influence causing bodily injury was not lesser included offense of gross vehicular manslaughter because offenses involved different victims. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
J. Detjen | May 28, 2020 |
|
18-50328
|
U.S. v. Grey
Administrative warrants cannot be used as vehicles to perform searches and seizures for pending criminal cases. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
A. Tashima | May 28, 2020 |
|
D074240
|
People v. Palmer
Defense counsel's concession of client's guilt to jury was deemed constitutional because defendant did not expressly state his desire to assert his innocence. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
R. Huffman | May 27, 2020 |
|
B297928
|
People v. Lee
Appellant's resentencing petition was properly denied because his murder conviction was based on provocative act doctrine and not felony murder. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
H. Bendix | May 27, 2020 |
|
B295511
|
Salari v. Superior Court (People)
A party does not impliedly waive right to timely filing of information by agreeing to later arraignment. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
T. Bigelow | May 27, 2020 |
|
B289603
|
People v. Braum
Double Jeopardy Clause protects only against multiple criminal punishments in successive proceedings for same offense. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
D. Kim | May 27, 2020 |
|
A155891
|
People v. Smolkin
Appellant's conviction under Penal Code Section 69 based on threatening speech was unconstitutional because his speech was not 'true threat.' |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
M. Simons | May 22, 2020 |
|
S248125
|
In re Christopher Lee White
Trial court's exercise of discretion in denying bail under California Constitution Article I, Section 12(b) did not constitute abuse of discretion. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
M. Cuéllar | May 22, 2020 |
|
S251706
|
People v. Rodriguez
Prosecutors must generally avoid raising subject of future perjury prosecutions in their closing arguments to avoid improper vouching. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
J. Groban | May 22, 2020 |
|
14-99003
|
Smith v. Baker
Petitioner successfully argued his counsel's performance was deficient but failed to show he was prejudiced by it. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
M. Christen | May 22, 2020 |
|
E071361
|
People v. Valles
Courts have discretion to strike greater enhancements only when imposed enhancement was legally inapplicable or unsupported by evidence. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
M. Ramirez | May 21, 2020 |
|
B298642
|
People v. Smith
Courts may not defer to jury's pre-'Banks/Clark' factual findings when determining petitioner's eligibility for resentencing under Penal Code Section 1170.95. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
C. Moor | May 19, 2020 |
|
E072845
|
Modification: People v. Law
Defendant was not entitled to relief under Penal Code Section 1170.95 because he was a major participant and acted with reckless indifference to human life. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
M. Slough | May 15, 2020 |
|
G057597
|
People v. Seo
Trial court properly refused to instruct jury that possession of counterfeiting equipment requires an intent to defraud. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
R. Ikola | May 14, 2020 |
|
C086156
|
People v. Prowell
State's interests in preventing defendant's harassing communication with victim could be served through narrower means than allowing warrantless searches of defendant's communication devices. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
C. Krause | May 13, 2020 |
|
E072647
|
People v. Sanchez
Penal Code 1170.95 does not apply to defendants convicted of voluntary manslaughter, it only provides relief for first degree murder convictions. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
F. Menetrez | May 11, 2020 |
|
A141375
|
People v. Thompkins
Kill zone theory does not apply where defendant merely subjected persons near primary target to lethal risk. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
J. Streeter | May 7, 2020 |
|
E072845
|
People v. Law
Defendant was not entitled to relief under Penal Code Section 1170.95 because he was a major participant and acted with reckless indifference to human life. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
M. Slough | May 7, 2020 |
|
B298914
|
People v. Triplett
Juries should be informed or reminded of their right to readback of testimony upon request to review testimony but such error was harmless here. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
F. Rothschild | May 6, 2020 |