For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court

REPLACEMENT COPY OF TUESDAY, AUGUST 19, 2025

Name Category Published
Olson v. State of Oklahoma
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 17, 1999
Brown v. New Mexico District Court Clerks
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 17, 1999
U.S. v. Ventura
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 17, 1999
U.S. v. Payne
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 17, 1999
McDaniel v. Williams
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 17, 1999
Munkus v. Furlong
A criminal defendant doesn't have constitutional right to be informed of his right to self-representations. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 17, 1999
Crowley v. Graham
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 17, 1999
U.S. v. Harfst
Ineffective counsel is shown where trial counsel fails to argue defendant is minor or minimal participant. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 17, 1999
Smith v. Ward
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 16, 1999
Taylor v. Hargett
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 16, 1999
U.S. v. Wilkinson
Sentencing guideline for pornography produced outside U.S. can be cross-referenced to get higher offense level. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 16, 1999
U.S. v. Murray
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 16, 1999
People v. Lawson
Willfully refusing to pay court-ordered restitution is proper reason to revoke probation. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 16, 1999
Jackson v. Champion
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 12, 1999
U.S. v. Ayala-Mendoza
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 11, 1999
U.S. v. Hook
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 11, 1999
Faith v. Ward
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 11, 1999
U.S. v. Hughes
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 10, 1999
U.S. v. Hernandez
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 10, 1999
In re George W.
A concealed folding knife doesn't constitute a 'dirk or dagger.' 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 10, 1999
People v. Matz
'Use' immunity doesn't compel defendant to self-incriminate as to collateral uncharged crimes. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 10, 1999
Beijer v. Adams
Presentation of drug courier profile evidence can bar retrial if it amounts to intentional misconduct. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 10, 1999
State v. Miller
It's fundamental error when a judge improperly participates in unsuccessful plea negotiations and then presides at trial. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 10, 1999
U.S. v. Walker
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 10, 1999
Weber v. Soares
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 10, 1999
Rice v. Christopher
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 10, 1999
Harjo v. Kaiser
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 10, 1999
Gonzales v. Lytle
Failure to allow the jury to consider the recantation of testimony incriminating a defendant, is error. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 10, 1999
Riggs v. California
Although petty offenses don't qualify as serious 'strike' crimes, certiorari is denied where habeas relief is possible. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 10, 1999
People v. Krantz
Undercover agent's alleged offer to pay for protected artifacts doesn't support entrapment defense. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 10, 1999
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.