For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court

Name Category Published
Dennis v. Scott
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 18, 1999
Williams v. Lytle
Opinion 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 18, 1999
Lopez v. Udall
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 18, 1999
Thannisch v. Scott
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 18, 1999
Drum and Davis v. QBD Technical Services, Inc. (County of Los Angeles)
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 18, 1999
Moore v. State of Utah Corporation
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 18, 1999
Maryland v. Dyson
Exigent circumstances aren't required to conduct a warrantless automobile search so long as there is probable cause. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 18, 1999
Jones v. U.S.
Eighth Amendment does not require for death penalty cases any jury instructions on the consequence of jury deadlock. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 18, 1999
People v. Ullery
Section16-8-103.6, 6 C.R.S. (1998) Waiver of privilege statute and attorney work product. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 18, 1999
United States v. Williams
Although population in federal prisons exceeds capacity, trial court can increase that population and sentence defendant to prison. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 18, 1999
Fuller v. Roe
Applicability of Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act is determined by date petition for habeas relief is filed. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 18, 1999
U.S. v. Lutz
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 18, 1999
U.S. v. Sanchez
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 18, 1999
U.S. v. Robles-Medina
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 17, 1999
Sponsel v. Neal
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 17, 1999
People v. Johnson
Offender rejected by community corrections program may not be resentenced to period of incarceration greater that original sentence. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 17, 1999
People v. Verbrugge
No jurisdiction to enter judgment for criminal medical negligence complaint filed after running of 18 month limitations period. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 17, 1999
U.S. v. Hartsfield
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 17, 1999
Raven v. Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 17, 1999
U.S. v. Cosby
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 17, 1999
U.S. v. Dighera
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 17, 1999
Williams v. Snider
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 17, 1999
Oliver v. Maxwell
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 17, 1999
Glaze v. Hargett
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 17, 1999
U.S. v. McHorse
Uncharged acts of child molestation may be admitted if jury is properly instructed to consider only the crime charged. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 17, 1999
Boyd v. Ward
Counsel isn't ineffective when counsel adequately investigated and prepared for trial. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 17, 1999
U.S. v. Spencer
Where court is unable to calculate actual tax loss regarding defendant's fraudulent tax returns, court may use tax rate presumptions in Sentencing Guidelines. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 17, 1999
U.S. v. Rucker
Sentence enhancements don't amount to double counting where defendant uses firearm in manner specified under Sentencing Guidelines. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 17, 1999
U.S. v. Espinoza-Ramirez
Opinion 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 17, 1999
Hendricks v. Ward
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 17, 1999
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.