| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
00-10204
|
U.S. v. Castaneda
Vulnerable-victim sentence enhancement isn't appropriate where factors that make victim vulnerable are usual for victims of offense. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 6, 2001 | |
|
00-10046
|
U.S. v. Taylor
Defendant convicted of transporting minor for purposes of prostitution need not know victim was minor. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 6, 2001 | |
|
99-35552
|
Flowers v. Walter
Prohibition against forced administration of drugs to criminal defendant is new constitutional rule that may be retroactively applied in habeas proceeding. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 6, 2001 | |
|
99SC431
|
People v. Covington
Photograph of victim's injury taken by physician's assistant at request of police are not protected by privilege, but are medical testimony. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 6, 2001 | |
|
00-1439
|
Christman v. Suthers
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 3, 2001 | |
|
00-2172
|
Santillanes v. Lemaster
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 3, 2001 | |
|
00-6256
|
U.S. v. Gaddis
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 3, 2001 | |
|
99-9136
|
Daniels v. United States
Prior convictions not set aside by time of sentencing under Armed Career Criminal Act are presumptively valid for sentence enhancement. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 3, 2001 | |
|
99-1884
|
Lackawanna County District Attorney v. Coss
Prior conviction used to enhance state sentence not open to direct or collateral attack if defendant failed to exhaust all available remedies. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 3, 2001 | |
|
00-6216
|
U.S. v. King
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 3, 2001 | |
|
00-5186
|
Thompson v. Boone
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 3, 2001 | |
|
00-4180
|
Willett v. Smith
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 3, 2001 | |
|
00-6412
|
Altizer v. Poppell
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 3, 2001 | |
|
00-7072
|
U.S. v. Teague
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 3, 2001 | |
|
00-2246
|
US v. Dwyer
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 3, 2001 | |
|
00-2478
|
U.S. v. Romero
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 3, 2001 | |
|
00-2196
|
U.S. v. Rivera-Avelar
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 3, 2001 | |
|
00-5114
|
Morrison Knudsen Corp. v. U.S.
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 3, 2001 | |
|
00-2455
|
Barnett v. Lemaster
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 3, 2001 | |
|
00-6071
|
Mendez v. Brown
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 3, 2001 | |
|
00-2258
|
U.S. v. Sedillo
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 3, 2001 | |
|
00-6336
|
Chavez v. State of Oklahoma
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 3, 2001 | |
|
00-2448
|
Lyons v. New Mexico Dept. of Corrections
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 3, 2001 | |
|
00-4189
|
U.S. v. Patron
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 3, 2001 | |
|
24280-0-II
|
Mathers v. State
Sexually violent predator may not combine total commitment with community-based treatment. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 3, 2001 | |
|
24266-4
|
State v. Jenkins
Statute setting forth registration requirements for sexually violent predators is unconstitutionally vague. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 3, 2001 | |
|
24352-1-II
|
State v. Jacobs
Domestic violence offender has no standing to challenge warrantless search of victim's residence. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 3, 2001 | |
|
24308-3-II
|
Washington v. Van Buren
State breaches plea agreement when it makes remarks to court justifying imposition of exceptional sentence. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 3, 2001 | |
|
24559-1
|
State v. Hampton
Defendant, who files false inspection form for sewage disposal system with health department, may be convicted for filing false document with public agency. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 3, 2001 | |
|
24564-7-II
|
Washington v. King
Speedy trial period commences when information is filed, where long and unnecessary delay occurs in bringing defendant who is amenable to process to court. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 3, 2001 |