| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
00-10457
|
U.S. v. Basalo
Court improperly departed downward eight levels from applicable sentencing guideline where no evidence existed that alleged government misconduct effected outcome of proceedings. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 4, 2001 | |
|
00-10437
|
U.S. v. Laskie
Conviction for being felon in possession of firearm is vacated where underlying conviction was 'set aside' by 'honorable discharge.' |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 4, 2001 | |
|
99-15935
|
Frye v. Hickman
In non-capital case, prisoner is not entitled to counsel on habeas petition, and equitable tolling is not required where attorney missed filing deadline. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 4, 2001 | |
|
99CA2022
|
People v.Smith
Trial court required to impose indeterminate sentence in case involving certain sex offenses. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 2, 2001 | |
|
99SC772
|
People v. Garcia
Provocation under second-degree murder statute is mitigating factor that prosecution must disprove, not separate lesser included offense. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 2, 2001 | |
|
00CA1561
|
Vashone-Caruso v. Suthere
Calculation of good time must be considered in determining parole eligibility date. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 2, 2001 | |
|
99SC270
|
Keller v. People
Prosecutor may not withdraw from plea agreement when trial court properly reduces sentence pursuant to 'boot camp' statute. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 2, 2001 | |
|
46448-5-I
|
State v. Holmes
Police officers' belief that woman had apparent authority to grant consent to search alleged drug dealer's residence wasn't objectively reasonable. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 2, 2001 | |
|
99CA2493
|
People v. Gonzales
Trial court authorized to order bond insurance company to refund bond premium where nonparty mistakenly required to post bond. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 1, 2001 | |
|
46994-1-I
|
State v. Wilson
Criminal case proceeds despite prosecutor's failure to secure interview between defense attorney and victim. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 1, 2001 | |
|
00-0162
|
In the Matter of 1996 Nissan Sentra
If criminal racketeering enterprise has ultimate goal of financial gain any property knowingly used to further criminal objective is subject to forfeiture. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 1, 2001 | |
|
00-0761
|
State v. Boyd
Conviction is reversed because defendant lacked notice that substance he ingested was dangerous illegal drug. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 1, 2001 | |
|
00-0237
|
State v. Bass
Defendant's challenge to admission and sufficiency of evidence are without merit, however court could not place him on lifetime probation. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 1, 2001 | |
|
00-0081
|
Steiger v. Woods
Attorney General did not have authority to use public funds to hire private counsel to represent officer in criminal case. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Sep. 25, 2001 | |
|
00-0821
|
State v. Ibanez
Juror with family history of alcoholism could not be fair and impartial in drunk driving trial. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Sep. 25, 2001 | |
|
00-0522
|
State v. Roman
Proposition mandating probation for drug possession doesn't mandate probation for promoting prison contraband, even when contraband consists of illegal drugs. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Sep. 25, 2001 | |
|
01-0144
|
Urs v. Maricopa County Attorney's Office
Reckless driving was jury-eligible offense at common law, and state constitution therefore guarantees offenders right to jury trial. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Sep. 25, 2001 | |
|
00-0508
|
State v. Hensley
Court doesn't err by refusing to revoke defendant's probation and impose prison term, however it incorrectly terminated probation as unsuccessful. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Sep. 25, 2001 | |
|
E028064
|
People v. Gaitan
Conviction for possession of metal knuckles did not require proof of specific intent to commit further violent act. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Sep. 25, 2001 | |
|
A085779
|
People v. Walsh
Territorial jurisdiction exists for crimes committed within 500 yards of prosecuting county. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Sep. 24, 2001 | |
|
69693-4
|
State v. Demery
Videotaped interview during which police accuse defendant of lying is not impermissible opinion testimony. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Sep. 24, 2001 | |
|
25849-8-II
|
State v. Goodman
Domestic abuse may be considered aggravating factor when sentencing for arson conviction. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Sep. 23, 2001 | |
|
45284-3-I
|
City of Seattle v. Patu
Where defendant himself invited instructional error by proposing constitutionally deficient jury instruction, court cannot grant relief. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Sep. 23, 2001 | |
|
G022732
|
People v. Cervantes
Provocative act doctrine only requires the murder to be the proximate cause of death and natural and probable consequence of defendant's actions. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Sep. 20, 2001 | |
|
25138-8-II
|
State v. Hoggatt
Defendant's cohabitant's voluntary consent justified officer's warrantless entry into living room. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Sep. 20, 2001 | |
|
70199-7
|
State v. Neal
Laboratory drug report that fails to identify person from whom substance was received cannot be admitted as evidence. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Sep. 20, 2001 | |
|
70452-0
|
State v. Lansden
Search warrant issued to code inspector invalid for purpose of searching for evidence of crime. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Sep. 20, 2001 | |
|
25878-1-II
|
State v. Tili
Court properly imposed special sentence against defendant guilty of multiple penetrations during rape instead of sentence of three separate counts of rape. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Sep. 20, 2001 | |
|
43703-8
|
Personal Restraint Petition of Vazquez
Second personal restraint petition must be introduced on different grounds than original petition and must be brought for good cause. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Sep. 20, 2001 | |
|
46254-7-I
|
State v. Cho
Defendant may be entitled to new trial based on juror misconduct when juror failed to disclose material fact during voir dire. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Sep. 20, 2001 |