For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Read Today's Digital Edition
Place Your Legal Notices
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court

Name Category Published
People v. Ochoa-Magana
Trial court is not required to advise non-English speaking defendant that he can use official interpreter to communicate with his attorney. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 20, 2002
People v. Seaney
Criminal defendant must receive adequate notice of mandatory period of parole. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 20, 2002
In re Ryan A.
Juvenile can commit intimidation even if intended victim did not feel threatened. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 20, 2002
State v. Everybodytalksabout
Defendant is entitled to new trial because character evidence was admitted improperly at first trial. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 20, 2002
Gandarela v. Johnson
Affidavits of new witnesses fail to provide colorable claim of innocence necessary to pass through 'Schlup' gateway. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 20, 2002
In re Sena
Prisoner's challenge of parole denial should be heard in court that imposed sentence. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 20, 2002
People v. Green
Post-trial motion to correct sentence must be brought within three years. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 20, 2002
People v. Keller
Defendant's right to counsel is not violated when undercover cop obtains incriminating statements of crimes other than crime already charged. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 20, 2002
People v. Legault
Defendant who pleaded no contest prior to enactment of Proposition 36 is not entitled to its benefits upon probation violation. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 20, 2002
People v. Cooper
Trial court's restriction of presentence credits for convicted murderer did not circumvent intent of Briggs Initiative. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 20, 2002
People v. Mason
Court properly imposed separate sentence enhancements for firearm use during robbery and murder. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 20, 2002
U.S. v. Varela-Rivera
Defendant's convictions are reversed because court erred in admitting expert testimony regarding modus operandi of drug trafficking enterprises and drug courier fees. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 19, 2002
U.S. v. Robles-Rodriguez
State drug conviction for which probation is maximum penalty is not aggravated felony triggering federal sentence enhancement. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 19, 2002
People v. Perry
Attorney's failure to convey plea offer did not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 19, 2002
People v. Richardson
Denial of challenges for cause was appropriate where jurors indicated they could be impartial. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 19, 2002
People v. Hayward
Jury instruction concerning 'make my day' law is appropriate where defendant claims self-defense. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 19, 2002
U.S. v. Rosales-Garay
District court did not err in adding two points to defendant's criminal history. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 19, 2002
U.S. v. Nguyen
Court did not abuse its discretion in ordering full forfeiture of bond when defendant willfully evaded surrender numerous times. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 19, 2002
U.S. v. Blueford
Conviction is reversed where prosecution engaged in misconduct by asking jury to make inferences it knew were false. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 19, 2002
Ghent v. Woodford
Defendant's death sentence vacated because trial court erroneously admitted testimony that violated Miranda rights. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 19, 2002
People v. Rester
Defendant may be convicted of offense of intimidating victim even though jury acquits him of related offenses. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 19, 2002
People v. Russell
Charging document is sufficient even though it doesn't list every element of offense that must be proved at trial. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 19, 2002
People v. Elder
Trial court authorized to revoke probation where defendant fails to comply with conditions of probation. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 19, 2002
People v. Dunlap
Trial court correctly denied defendant's motion to reduce his death sentence. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 19, 2002
In the Interest of T.A.O., a child
Confessions of juvenile related to sexual assault may not be admitted prior to the establishment of a prima facie case for charged offense. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 19, 2002
People v. Martinez
Special offender status is a sentence enhancer, and not a separate offense. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 19, 2002
People v. Haykel
Assault by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury is not serious felony for Three Strikes purposes. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 14, 2002
State v. Canez
Conviction and death sentence for first-degree murder are upheld. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 14, 2002
People v. Sanchez
Unanimous jury verdict is not required for conviction for animal cruelty committed during continous course of conduct. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 14, 2002
In re Scoggins
Probation provision of Proposition 36 applies where defendant committed offense before effective date but judgment was deferred until after effective date. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 14, 2002
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.