For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Read Today's Digital Edition
Place Your Legal Notices
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court

Name Category Published
Osband v. Woodford
Protective order limiting state's use of materials discovered is not clear error. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 3, 2002
U.S. v. Davis
Domestic violence call was not exigent circumstance sufficient to justify warrantless search. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 3, 2002
U.S. v. Torres-Palma
Sentence imposed through video conference violates requirement that defendant be physically present at sentencing. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 3, 2002
U.S. v. Weaver
Crime of equity skimming merely requires proof of transfer of title, not that real estate was purchased for adequate consideration. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 3, 2002
People v. Trujillo
Defendant's voluntary, unwarned statements cannot be used to rebut defense theory or to impeach witness other than defendant. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 3, 2002
Franklin v. Johnson
Absent a showing of prejudice, Counsel's deficient representation will not warrant habeas relief. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 3, 2002
People v. Norton
Defendant entitled to presentence confinement credit against sentence for offense committed while on parole. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 3, 2002
In the Interest of J.P.L.
Evidence supported adjudication of minor as delinquent based on threats made to classmates. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 3, 2002
Scott v. Mullin
Habeas relief is warranted where prosecution withheld exculpatory evidence. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 3, 2002
Herrera v. Lemaster
District court must assess harmlessness of Fourth Amendment violation under 'Brecht v. Abrahamson' standard. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 3, 2002
Powell v. Ray
Elimination of pre-parole supervised release program did not violate Ex Post Facto Clause. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 3, 2002
People v. Pineda-Eriza
Sentence enhancers may only be applied to certain offenses. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 2, 2002
U.S. v. Pace
Wire fraud conviction is reversed due to improper venue. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 2, 2002
Taniguchi v. Schultz
Unavailability of deportation waiver for lawful permanent resident convicted of felony does not violate equal protection. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 2, 2002
U.S. v. Long
Defendant who failed to establish residency in home lacked standing to challenge police search. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 2, 2002
U.S. v. Monreal
California district court lacked jurisdiction to review conviction in Iowa district court. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 2, 2002
U.S. v. Rashkovski
Despite aliens' desires to emigrate without intention to engage in prostitution, sufficient evidence supports defendant's conviction for smuggling aliens for prostitution purposes. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 2, 2002
State v. Simmons
Evidence of intent was sufficient to support conviction for forgery. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 27, 2002
People v. Steele
Prior murder conviction is admissible to prove subsequent murder was committed with premeditation. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 27, 2002
People v. Slaughter
Prosecutor's biblical references during penalty phase argument were improper but harmless error. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 27, 2002
People v. Valencia
Penetration into area behind window screen qualifies as 'entry into any building' within meaning of burglary statute. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 27, 2002
State v. Oster
Separate jury instruction establishing elements of charged crime did not violate defendant's constitutional rights. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 27, 2002
State v. Zatkovich
Exceptional sentence for stalking was appropriate. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 27, 2002
U.S. v. Finley
Trial court erred in excluding psychological expert testimony that corroborated defense. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 26, 2002
State v. Prion
Trial court's errors require reversal of conviction and death sentence for first-degree murder. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 26, 2002
State v. Wible
Convictions for possession of depictions of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct are affirmed. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 26, 2002
State v. Fell (Waldstein)
Necessity defense does not apply to criminal offenses defined outside Title 13. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 26, 2002
Knighton v. Mullin
Admission of evidence of prior crimes committed by defendant did not result in unfair trial. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 25, 2002
U.S. v. Stapleton
Defendant is vicariously liable for mail and wire fraud based on participation in telemarketing scheme. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 25, 2002
U.S.v. Romero
Two-year level enhancement was proper for defendant who posed as INS employee and promised to expedite applications in exchange for money. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 25, 2002
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.