| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2000-0517
|
State v. Booker
Premeditation instruction requiring reflection regardless of length of time did not eliminate distinction between first and second-degree murder. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Sep. 23, 2002 | |
|
71489-4
|
State v. Kilgore
Trial court is not required to conduct evidentiary hearing before admitting evidence of 'other crimes.' |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Sep. 23, 2002 | |
|
71575-1
|
Personal Restraint Petition of Fawcett
Defendant was not prejudiced by incorrect information regarding his minimum obligation to serve community placement. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Sep. 23, 2002 | |
|
C036029
|
People v. Ashburn
Police were entitled to impound car for expired registration even though defendant had registered car day before. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Sep. 22, 2002 | |
|
00CA0175
|
People v. Martinez
Special offender statute does not determine length of habitual offender sentence. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Sep. 22, 2002 | |
|
99CA2370
|
People v. Bonilla-Garcia
Court of appeals lacked authority to stay or withdraw mandate once petition for certiorari is denied. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Sep. 22, 2002 | |
|
01CA0414
|
People v. Ambos
Claims not included in initial postconviction motion are precluded by statute of limitations. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Sep. 22, 2002 | |
|
01-4150
|
U.S. v. Tucker
Search of parolee's home and computer based on tip from citizen-informant is reasonable under Fourth Amendment. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Sep. 22, 2002 | |
|
02SA97
|
People v. Triantos
Officer may arrest offender who commits petty offense in his presence and then release at his discretion. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Sep. 22, 2002 | |
|
B150125
|
People v. Ranger Insurance Co.
Trial court prematurely entered summary judgment against bail bond surety before extended 180-day period expired. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Sep. 19, 2002 | |
|
B146793
|
People v. Barber
Defendant must be retried because court conducted inadequate inquiry regarding possible juror misconduct. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Sep. 19, 2002 | |
|
S091459
|
People v. Totari
Defendant may appeal denial of motion to vacate guilty plea when he was not advised of immigration consequences 13 years after imposition of judgment. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Sep. 18, 2002 | |
|
A095040
|
Smith v. Santa Rosa Police Dept.
Lack of knowledge qualifies as mitigating circumstance where owner was unaware of driver's suspended license before loaning vehicle. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Sep. 17, 2002 | |
|
A092493
|
People v. Herman
Soliciting minors to engage in lewd conduct does not constitute violation of criminal solicitation statute. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Sep. 17, 2002 | |
|
01-10415
|
US v. Reyna-Tapia
Delegation of Rule II plea colloquy to magistrate judge with defendants' consent is permissible under Federal Magistrates Act. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Sep. 17, 2002 | |
|
00-16867
|
Benny v. U.S. Parole Commission
Defendant who serves five years of parole without early termination hearing is not entitled to automatic termination. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Sep. 17, 2002 | |
|
01-3195
|
Reed v. Hannigan
Writ of habeas corpus by defendant who voluntarily pleaded guilty to indecent liberties with stepdaughter was properly denied. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Sep. 17, 2002 | |
|
01-50159
|
U.S. v. Bravo
Border agents had reasonable suspicion to use hammer to open toolbox in bed of truck. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Sep. 17, 2002 | |
|
00-50606
|
U.S. v. Yanez-Saucedo
Third-degree rape conviction constitutes aggravated felony sentencing enhancement under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Sep. 17, 2002 | |
|
01-10461
|
U.S. v. Perez-Corona
Prior conviction for possession of stolen vehicle is not an aggravated felony and defendant is not subject to sentencing enhancement. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Sep. 17, 2002 | |
|
01-50320
|
U.S. v. Zaragoza
When customs inspector briefly handcuffs individual during border detention, individual is not under arrest nor unreasonably detained for Fourth Amendment purposes. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Sep. 17, 2002 | |
|
01-5052
|
U.S. v. Goldberg
District court abused its discretion by failing to base degree of departure determination on reasonable methodology hitched to U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Sep. 17, 2002 | |
|
00-3262
|
U.S. v. Avery
Affidavit omitting confidential informant's lengthy criminal history that demonstrates informants reliability establishes probable cause. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Sep. 17, 2002 | |
|
01-10045
|
U.S. v. Orellana-Blanco
Evidence that alien entered into sham marriage to evade immigration laws was improperly introduced at trial. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Sep. 17, 2002 | |
|
01-2248
|
U.S. v. Concha
Court was authorized to consider prior foreign convictions to impose upward departure in sentence. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Sep. 17, 2002 | |
|
01-1135
|
Gometz v. U.S. Parole Commission
Parole Commission's Category 8 rating and imposition of minimum of 430 months sentence instead of 402 months is proper. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Sep. 17, 2002 | |
|
B156011
|
People v. Superior Court (Turner)
Eligibility for probation for drug possession conviction requires five years of freedom from incarceration immediately preceding drug offense. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Sep. 17, 2002 | |
|
71188-7
|
State v. Read
Admission of opinion testimony to determine reasonableness of defendant's self-defense claim was not reversible error. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Sep. 17, 2002 | |
|
20463-4
|
State v. Wiggins
Conviction for unlawful possession of explosives requires showing that defendant possessed all components necessary to assemble explosive device. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Sep. 17, 2002 | |
|
44731-9
|
State v. King
Robbery and kidnapping convictions are reversed due to prejudicial jury instruction that permitted conviction based on foreseeable actions of co-conspirators. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Sep. 17, 2002 |