For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Read Today's Digital Edition
Place Your Legal Notices
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court

Name Category Published
People v. Betts
Trial court should determine whether it has jurisdiction to adjudicate charge of crime committed outside of state. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 8, 2005
People v. Morgan
Caller's reliable, non-assertive statements to police are admissible over a hearsay objection. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 8, 2005
People v. Watson
Prisoner transferred to state hospital is not 'confined in state prison' as defined by battery statute. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 8, 2005
Buckley v. Terhune
State court fact-finding at habeas hearing that rested solely on written record is entitled to presumption of correctness. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 8, 2005
U.S. v. Schoneberg
Prohibiting cross-examination of witness about his plea bargain violated defendant's confrontation rights. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 8, 2005
Henderson v. Lampert
Petitioner's failure to appeal dismissal of first habeas petition precludes him from challenging dismissal in second petition. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 8, 2005
People v. Parras
Trial court's jury instruction on voluntary manslaughter without intent to kill was appropriate. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 8, 2005
People v. Jackson
Defendant is guilty of robbery even though victim was unaware any property had been stolen until defendant fled scene. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 4, 2005
People v. Roldan
Denial of continuance in death penalty case was proper in light of defendant's attempt to manufacture delay. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 3, 2005
People v. Enos
Court may impose separate fines for several cases disposed of at single sentencing hearing. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 3, 2005
People v. McElwee
Prosecutor's agreement to reduce defendant's offense did not bar him from arguing against parole. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 3, 2005
People v. Smith
Prophylactic procedures required in appeal by indigent criminal defendant do not apply to appeal of commitment under Mentally Disordered Offender statute. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 3, 2005
People v. Garrido
Failure by defendant to renew motion to suppress evidence after denial of motion and subsequent guilty plea renders motion nonappealable. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 3, 2005
People v. Thoma
Defendant's silence in face of judge's description of victim's injuries is tacit admission of truth. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 3, 2005
People v. Parras
Trial court's jury instruction on voluntary manslaughter without intent to kill was appropriate. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 2, 2005
People v. Harrison
Prosecutor's religious comments during guilt phase did not constitute prosecutorial misconduct. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 2, 2005
In re Sakarias
Prosecutor's use of inconsistent factual theories in separate trials of co-defendants requires vacation of death sentence. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 2, 2005
People v. Washington
Defendants who forced bank manager to move 25 feet to open vault are not guilty of kidnapping for purpose of robbery. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 2, 2005
People v. Oliver
Substantial evidence exists that pursuing police vehicle displayed at least one lighted red lamp and was distinctively marked. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 1, 2005
People v. Vieira
Defendant cannot be sentenced to death for conspiracy to commit murder. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 1, 2005
Pham v. Terhune
Convicted murderer was entitled lab reports about gunshot residue on second shooter. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jul. 31, 2005
U.S. v. Hickey
Because none of defendant's contentions raise colorable claim under collateral order doctrine, appeals are dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jul. 31, 2005
Barapind v. Enomoto
Court determining whether offenses were political must focus on motivation for acts. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jul. 31, 2005
U.S. v. Garcia
Aiding and abetting alien smuggling is same offense as substantive offense of alien smuggling, premised on different theory of liability. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jul. 31, 2005
People v. Garcia
District attorneys are not independently empowered to initiate civil commitment proceedings under Mentally Disordered Offender Act. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jul. 31, 2005
People v. Aegis Security Insurance Co.
Erroneous date in notice of forfeiture did not deprive court of jurisdiction to enter judgment. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jul. 31, 2005
Garcia v. Carey
Evidence that gang member committed robbery on gang turf is not sufficient for gang enhancement. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jul. 26, 2005
Allen v. Woodford
Defense counsel's failure to present mitigating witness testimony is harmless error due to overwhelming evidence of defendant's guilt. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jul. 26, 2005
U.S. v. Marquez
Random, additional screening procedure at airport is reasonable under Fourth Amendment. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jul. 26, 2005
People v. Wahlert
Admission of pretext call statements made against defendant was harmless error. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jul. 26, 2005
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.