For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court
Name Category Published
U.S. v. Taylor
Attempted Hobbs Act robbery did not qualify as a "crime of violence" under U.S.C. Section 924(c) since no element of the offense required proof that defendant actually used or threatened force. 		Criminal Law and Procedure USSC Jun. 22, 2022
Shoop v. Twyford
Order allowing prisoner to search for new evidence was not "necessary or appropriate in aid of" a federal court's adjudication of a habeas corpus action. 		Criminal Law and Procedure USSC Jun. 22, 2022
P. v. Basler
Where eligibility for relief under Penal Code Section 1170.95, the resentencing statute, requires an evidentiary hearing, a defendant has a right to be present at that hearing absent a valid waiver. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 4DCA/1 Jun. 22, 2022
People v. Richardson
Defendant's statement to, "Shoot him. Shoot him," evidenced him to be a major participant in a felony murder and ineligible for Penal Code Section 1170.95 resentencing. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 4DCA/2 Jun. 20, 2022
People v. Johnson
A defendant who threatened to kill himself if a witness calls the police did not threaten force against a "third party" under the prohibition on dissuading a witness by threat of force. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 1DCA/3 Jun. 20, 2022
People v. Flores
The trial court's consideration of defendant's record of conviction without a finding by the jury to impose an upper sentence term did not warrant resentencing. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 1DCA/3 Jun. 17, 2022
U.S. v. David
An alleged omission of an advisal did not affect defendant's substantial rights because he demonstrated understanding and knowledge of his appeal waiver during the execution of his plea agreement. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 9th Jun. 16, 2022
People v. Arreguin
Trial court lacked jurisdiction to summarily revoke defendant's probation because AB 1950's probation limit ended probation before the revocation. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 1DCA/3 Jun. 16, 2022
People v. Garcia
The trial court properly concluded that defendant understood the immigration consequences of his guilty plea based on his statements about now having to live in Mexico following the plea hearing. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 2DCA/6 Jun. 16, 2022
People v. Smith
Courts, not probation officers, must make the decision whether to require defendants to attend residential treatment programs. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 1DCA/5 Jun. 15, 2022
U.S. v. Manaku
The FBI's failure to leave a complete copy of a warrant did not justify suppression of evidence because the error seemed to be a negligent mistake, rather than deliberate disregard for the procedure. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 9th Jun. 15, 2022
People v. Qualkinbush
When imposing sentences, trial court decisions regarding mental health diversion must indicate they considered the anti-recidivism purposes of Penal Code Section 1001.35. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 4DCA/1 Jun. 15, 2022
People v. Zuniga
Defendant must pay restitution to hit and run victim even though his probation had been terminated early since the court was merely enforcing the previously unascertainable original restitution payment. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 4DCA/1 Jun. 15, 2022
People v. Bunas
A court ruling on a petitioner's motion for mental health diversion is not required to determine the defendant's eligibility prior to determining the offense's suitability. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 4DCA/1 Jun. 15, 2022
People v. Watts
The trial court's error, concluding that the prosecutor's consent was necessary for pretrial mental health diversion, was harmless as it independently found valid grounds for denying diversion. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 2DCA/8 Jun. 15, 2022
U.S. v. Mathews
Conviction for damaging property with an explosive was not a "crime of violence" under 18 U.S.C. 924(c)(1) because it criminalized the destruction of one's own property, not just others' property. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 9th Jun. 13, 2022
In re Sambrano
Absent the evidence of a primary target, the kill zone instruction should not have been given to jury in an attempted murder trial. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 4DCA/2 Jun. 10, 2022
U.S. v. Merrell
The First Step Act, and not the pre-amended statute, applies at post-Act resentencing of defendants whose sentences were imposed before the Act's passage. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 9th Jun. 10, 2022
U.S. v. Tagatac
Hawaii's second-degree robbery statute is divisible and renders the crime under each subsection a crime of violence. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 9th Jun. 10, 2022
Modification: P. v. Owens
Considering the totality of the circumstances, substantial evidence supported the finding that defendant acted with reckless indifference to human life. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 2DCA/6 Jun. 9, 2022
Willie Jones, Sr. v. USA
Petitioner's second or successive application for postconviction relief failed to make a prima facie showing because petitioner did not rely on a new rule of constitutional law, but rather a statutory one. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 9th Jun. 9, 2022
P. v. Rodriguez
Penal Code that listed probation length in a different code than the underlying crime had included probation length "within its provisions" under Assembly Bill 1950 since separation was a matter of form. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 1DCA/4 Jun. 8, 2022
P. v. Accredited Surety and Casualty Co.
A surety on a bail bond was estopped from raising the invalidity of the reinstatement order as a basis for vacating the summary judgment. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 5DCA Jun. 8, 2022
U.S. v. Mendez
Defendant "used" his girlfriend's 14-year-old daughter to engage in sexually explicit conduct under United States Code Section 2251(a) when he placed hidden cameras in her bedroom. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 9th Jun. 7, 2022
People v. Soto
A generic advisement that a guilty plea "may" cause deportation did not adequately convey the mandatory immigration consequences and rendered defendant's guilty plea invalid. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 3DCA Jun. 6, 2022
Nazir v. Superior Court (People)
Trial court could dismiss a firearm sentencing enhancement based on the prosecutor's motion to dismiss pursuant to the District Attorney's Special Directive 20-08 if dismissal was "in furtherance of justice." 		Criminal Law and Procedure 2DCA/7 Jun. 3, 2022
The Association of Deputy District Attorneys v. Gascon
Mandamus was not available to compel a prosecutor to prove prior strikes under the three strikes law because the decision whether to prove a prior strike allegation or move to dismiss or strike it is discretionary. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 2DCA/7 Jun. 3, 2022
U.S. v. Werle
Defendant was prejudiced by not being informed of the knowledge element of being a felon in possession of a firearm, because defendant might not have known that he qualified as a felon. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 9th Jun. 3, 2022
Amended Opinion: U.S. v. Briones
The imposition of a life sentence for crimes committed by defendant while he was a juvenile was affirmed because the resentencing judge clearly considered defendant's youth. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 9th Jun. 2, 2022
Atwood v. Shinn
New claims asserted by death row inmate in successive habeas corpus applications did not meet 28 U.S.C. Section 2244(b)(2)'s criteria. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 9th Jun. 1, 2022
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.