| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
06-99002
|
Morales v. Hickman
Requirement that anesthesiologist be present during execution sufficiently ensured condemned would not be subject to undue risk of extreme pain. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 5, 2006 | |
|
A107069
|
People v. Allegheny Casualty Co.
Forfeiture of bail must be set aside where Penal Code requires declaration that bail is forfeited 'in open court'. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 4, 2006 | |
|
D045636
|
People v. Rubics
Restitution to victim's family was proper in hit and run case because loss was incurred as result of commission of crime. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 29, 2006 | |
|
F046238
|
People v. Lee
Despite being inmate himself, offender was properly convicted of conspiracy to furnish controlled substance to persons in custody. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 29, 2006 | |
|
05-502
|
Brigham City v. Stuart
Police may enter home without warrant when they have objectively reasonable belief that occupant is seriously injured or threatened with serious injury. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 25, 2006 | |
|
A105383
|
People v. Hiscox
Ex post facto claim is proper where prosecutor failed to establish that sentence statute was in effect at time of defendant's offenses. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 24, 2006 | |
|
04-50425
|
U.S. v. Hagege
Court committed error in viewing U.S. Sentencing Guidelines as mandatory when sentencing defendant for fraud. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 24, 2006 | |
|
S122590
|
Freeman on H.C.
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 23, 2006 | |
|
A098085
|
People v. Johnson
In suppression hearing, prosecution may present investigating officer's affidavit in lieu of live testimony. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 23, 2006 | |
|
A097749
|
People v. McGee
Defendant is entitled to jury trial on factual issues regarding prior convictions used to enhance sentence. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 23, 2006 | |
|
B160417
|
People v. Shabazz
Defendant sentenced to life without parole cannot receive enhancement of 25 years to life. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 23, 2006 | |
|
E031035
|
People v. Lewis
Opinion |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 19, 2006 | |
|
03-10311
|
U.S. v. Grubbs
Facially defective anticipatory search warrant cannot be cured with affidavit that is not presented to property owner. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 5, 2006 | |
|
04-10041
|
U.S. v. Gonzalez Inc.
Evidence used to support issuance of wiretaps failed to meet statutory necessity requirement. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 1, 2006 | |
|
05-10060
|
U.S. v. Rutledge
Assets of non-profit corporation controlled by indicted party were not subject to forfeiture where assets were not proceeds of alleged fraud. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 1, 2006 | |
|
04-1324
|
Day v. McDonough
District court may, on its own initiative, consider timeliness of state prisoner's habeas petition even if state does not contest petition's timeliness. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Apr. 26, 2006 | |
|
B181560
|
People v. Fisher
At mentally disordered offender hearing, leg restraints were proper where no objection was made and defendant was escape risk. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Apr. 24, 2006 | |
|
E036773
|
People v. Fulcher
Present testimony of victim that included additional details of sexual act giving rise to prior conviction was admissible at SVP commitment proceeding. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Apr. 23, 2006 | |
|
C046556
|
People v. Lamb
Defense counsel's failure to disclose information from its accident reconstruction expert violated discovery rules. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Apr. 23, 2006 | |
|
01-99015
|
Williams v. Stewart
Convict's petition for post-conviction relief was properly denied where evidence presented against him was sufficient to support death sentence. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Apr. 19, 2006 | |
|
05-15059
|
Kaua v. Frank
Because public protection finding increased defendant's sentence beyond that authorized by jury's guilty verdict, Sixth Amendment required jury to make finding. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Apr. 11, 2006 | |
|
05-30045
|
U.S. v. Plouffe
Where district court's sentencing approach was reasoned and addressed applicable statutory factors, defendant's sentence is reasonable and will not be disturbed. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Apr. 11, 2006 | |
|
F045355
|
People v. Mejia-Lenares
Because imperfect self-defense cannot be based on delusion alone, jurors did not have to be instructed to consider evidence of hallucination. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Apr. 10, 2006 | |
|
04-10681
|
U.S. v. Russell
Emergency doctrine supported warrantless search of home on suspicion that victim, or suspect was still inside. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Apr. 10, 2006 | |
|
04-17338
|
Goldyn v. Hayes
Conviction for writing bad checks was improper where accused's bank guaranteed her checks regardless of her account status. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Apr. 10, 2006 | |
|
05-10073
|
U.S. v. Ye
Appellate jurisdiction does not exist under provision of Economic Espionage Act, but mandamus relief is granted. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Apr. 10, 2006 | |
|
F047529
|
In re Tate
Defendant's nonviolent in-prison conviction is eligible for sentence term credits where it is separate from his violent out-of-prison conviction. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Apr. 7, 2006 | |
|
G035212
|
County of Orange v. Ranger Insurance Co.
Court did not abuse discretion by delaying bail bond forfeiture in reliance upon defense counsel representations made after speaking with client's sister. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Apr. 7, 2006 | |
|
05-30066
|
U.S. v. Guerrero-Velasquez
For purposes of sentencing guidelines, court must consider charging allegations when determining whether prior conviction under 'Alford' plea is crime of violence. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Apr. 7, 2006 | |
|
B178992
|
People v. Harco National Insurance Co.
Because insufficient evidence supports finding of sufficient excuse for defendant's failure to appear, trial court erred in forfeiting bail at later date. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Apr. 7, 2006 |