For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Read Today's Digital Edition
Place Your Legal Notices
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court

Name Category Published
U.S. v. Garcia-Beltran
Government may require offender to submit new fingerprint exemplars to establish his identity at trial for illegal re-entry. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 22, 2006
U.S. v. Ligon
In theft cases, 'archaeological value' does not come within definition of 'value' as used in 18 U.S.C. Section 641. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 21, 2006
People v. Platz
Mother cannot assert consent defense to kidnapping, which resulted in her child's murder. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 21, 2006
People v. Lamb
Defense counsel's failure to disclose information from its accident reconstruction expert violated discovery rules. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 21, 2006
People v. Christopher
Defendant forfeited right to challenge jury instruction and response to request for clarification on appeal by failing to object at trial. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 21, 2006
People v. Robinson
Improper application of caselaw in considering defendant's challenge to jury selection requires new hearing. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 17, 2006
People v. Prince
DNA statistics based on defendant's ethnicity as opposed to perpetrator's were proper in light of independent evidence establishing defendant as perpetrator. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 17, 2006
People v. Wilson
Relevant group for determining DNA probabilities is population of possible suspects, not perpetrator's racial group. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 16, 2006
People v. Johnson
Prosecution's use of peremptory challenges to exclude all African-American jurors was sufficient evidence to prove improper group bias. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 16, 2006
People v. Brendlin
As passenger in car stopped by law enforcement officer, defendant can challenge legality of stop. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 16, 2006
People v. Vasquez
Court's error in denying defendant's motion to recuse district attorney's office was not prejudicial. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 16, 2006
People v. Modiri
Defendant's sentence was improperly enhanced in absence of finding that he personally inflicted great bodily injury upon victim. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 16, 2006
People v. Vasquez
Defendant's conviction of assault with intent to commit rape is not lesser included offense of attempted forcible rape. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 16, 2006
People v. Cottle
Court improperly denied defendant's request to reopen jury selection in order to exercise peremptory challenge. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 15, 2006
U.S. v. Arreola
Where statute defines only single offense, indictment against defendant was not duplicitous. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 9, 2006
Holmes v. South Carolina
Third-party guilt evidentiary rule violates defendant's right to have meaningful opportunity to present complete defense. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 9, 2006
Rasberry v. Garcia
Court is not obligated to inform pro se habeas petitioner of potentially exhausted claims that petitioner failed to include in habeas petition. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 9, 2006
U.S. v. Evans-Martinez
District court should have provided notice to offender of its intent to sentence him outside range suggested by Sentencing Guidelines. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 9, 2006
People v. Hinton
Capital offender whose allegations of prosecutorial misconduct were unfounded was not entitled to new trial. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 8, 2006
U.S. v. Casch
In jury trial, it is not for court to determine that venue exists, but any such error is subject to harmless error analysis. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 8, 2006
U.S. v. Pintado-Isiordia
Court failed to make clear on record which approach it relied on when it concluded that defendant's conviction was crime of violence. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 8, 2006
U.S. v. Morales-Perez
Conviction under California Health and Safety Code Section 11351.5 categorically qualifies as drug trafficking offense under federal Sentencing Guidelines. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 8, 2006
Benitez v. Garcia
Federal habeas courts may enforce limitations on punishment of extradited fugitive if punishment exceeds that imposed by extraditing country. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 7, 2006
Hydrick v. Hunter
Where sexually violent predators challenge conditions of confinement, Eleventh Amendment does not bar claim for damages against defendants in their individual capacities. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 7, 2006
U.S. v. Rios
Conviction for possession of firearm in furtherance of drug crime was improper where firearm was not readily accessible to offender during crime. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 7, 2006
Mendoza v. Carey
Prisoner's inability to obtain Spanish-language legal materials may entitle him to equitable tolling for his petition for writ of habeas corpus. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 7, 2006
Little v. Crawford
Habeas corpus petitioner failed to show alleged Nevada Supreme Court's misapplication of law violated his federal constitutional rights. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 7, 2006
People v. Sturm
Death penalty sentence is not proper where cumulative effect of judge's misconduct requires reversal. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 7, 2006
In re Alcox
Attorney's failure to investigate alibi witnesses did not amount to ineffective assistance where accused made incriminating statements concerning guilt. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 7, 2006
People v. Espana
Offender's request to have DNA samples removed from data bank was properly denied in light of amendment to applicable Penal Code provisions. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 7, 2006
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.