Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
C093672
|
People v. Njoku
Appellate court was entitled to defer to factual findings on the record in concluding that defendant was not entitled to felony murder resentecing. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
R. Robie | Sep. 5, 2023 |
D079799
|
People v. Doron
Remand was appropriate for trial court to reconsider motion for pretrial mental health diversion considering new, retroactive legislative presumption that defendant's mental disorder was a significant factor in his crimes. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
T. O'Rourke | Sep. 5, 2023 |
B325493
|
People v. Rojas
Penal Code Section 1172.6 provides sentencing courts with discretion to impose parole regardless of excess custody credits. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
A. Collins | Sep. 5, 2023 |
22-50112
|
U.S. v. Torres-Giles
District court did not err in sentencing defendant to a longer term than his non-binding Type B plea agreement because they appraised him of the agreement's nature. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
G. Sanchez | Sep. 1, 2023 |
S273391
|
Camacho v. Superior Court (People)
Sexually violent predator's due process rights were not violated despite waiting since 2006 for recomittment trial because the delay was attributable mostly to him or his counsel. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
L. Kruger | Sep. 1, 2023 |
E079750
|
Modification: People v. Vance
When an appellate opinion is admitted at an evidentiary hearing under Section 1172.6 without objection, it is substantial evidence that the trial court can consider. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 31, 2023 | |
A166559
|
Dept. of Corrections & Rehabilitation v. Superior Court (Escobedo)
Trial court lacked authority to release lifetime parolee on probation after finding that he committed a new criminal offense and should have remanded him to the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
A. Tucher | Aug. 29, 2023 |
H049408
|
People v. Moyer
Penal Code's definition of bribery does not require that the target personally receive the thing of value promised in exchange for the official action. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
D. Bromberg | Aug. 29, 2023 |
22-50024
|
U.S. v. Pepe
District court did not err in disallowing certain jury instructions regarding defendant's overseas travel to commit sexual acts on children. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
L. VanDyke | Aug. 29, 2023 |
22-10203
|
U.S. v. Taylor
District court did not unconstitutionally delegate its judicial authority by ordering probation officer to supervise defendant's progress in inpatient treatment and grating officer discretion to reduce but not increase duration of his treatment. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
M. Christen | Aug. 28, 2023 |
20-55816
|
Burgos v. Madden
Because Confrontation Clause violation did not substantially compromise jury verdict, habeas relief was unavailable. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
M. Smith | Aug. 28, 2023 |
23-50012
|
U.S. v. Estrada
District court had jurisdiction over revocation proceedings where the defendant had been on supervised release and had violated its conditions regardless of whether the underlying supervision sentence was lawful. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
A. Tashima | Aug. 25, 2023 |
B322752
|
People v. The North River Insurance Co.
Forfeiture of bail bond was not appropriate where bail company located the defendant in Mexico but prosecutors failed to make an extradition decision before end of appearance period. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
J. Wiley | Aug. 22, 2023 |
S271049
|
People v. Mumin
The concurrent intent (or "kill zone") attempted murder instruction should only be given where there is substantial evidence that supports that defendant intended to kill everyone within a "kill zone." |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
C. Corrigan | Aug. 18, 2023 |
B318310
|
People v. Meza
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 18, 2023 | |
C097144
|
Torres v. Superior Court (People)
Petitioner's Section 170.6 challenge to the judge was properly denied as untimely because her felony murder request for resentencing on remand did not constitute a "new trial." |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
E. Duarte | Aug. 17, 2023 |
B326653
|
People v. Superior Court (Mitchell)
Prosecutors may appeal a trial court's postpreliminary hearing, pretrial order reducing a felony "wobbler" to a misdemeanor because the trial court lacks authority to reduce the charge at that time. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
K. Yegan | Aug. 17, 2023 |
17-50167
|
U.S. v. Eckford
Aiding and abetting an armed robbery under the Hobbs Act is a "crime of violence" that includes a mandatory minimum sentence for using a firearm. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
J. Bybee | Aug. 16, 2023 |
21-30277
|
U.S. v. Sadler
The provisions and commentary of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines do not create a right to collaterally attack prior convictions used for sentence enhancement. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
D. Collins | Aug. 16, 2023 |
S269237
|
People v. Gray
A "spontaneous statement" (the hearsay exception) does not automatically satisfy a probationer's due process right of confrontation nor is automatically admissible at a probation revocation hearing. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
P. Guerrero | Aug. 15, 2023 |
22-35030
|
Dorsey v. U.S.
A conviction for witness tampering by attempting to kill necessarily entails an element of using physical force and thus constitutes a "crime of violence". |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
S. Graber | Aug. 14, 2023 |
18-10435
|
U.S. v. Alahmedalabdaloklah
Statute criminalizing destruction of U.S. government property overcame presumption against extraterritoriality because it criminalized conduct directly harming the government and had foreseeable extraterritorial applications at the time it was passed. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
M. Christen | Aug. 10, 2023 |
E079750
|
People v. Vance
When an appellate opinion is admitted at an evidentiary hearing under Section 1172.6 without objection, it is substantial evidence that the trial court can consider. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
M. Ramirez | Aug. 9, 2023 |
21-50237
|
U.S. v. Dadyan
The court remanded to amend judgment to reflect that defendant's restitution obligation was joint and several with his co-conspirators because the judgment did not reflect the district court's findings that supported such liability. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
M. Smith | Aug. 8, 2023 |
21-50302
|
U.S. v. Ayvazyan
District court did not err when it ordered defendant to pay restitution under the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act that exceeded the amount of loss it calculated when applying sentencing guidelines. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
M. Smith | Aug. 8, 2023 |
A165925
|
People v. Vaesau
A district attorney's felony resentencing request under Penal Code Section 1172.1 may be withdrawn if withdrawal is supported by a legitimate reason. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
J. Humes | Aug. 7, 2023 |
D080369
|
People v. Del Rio
Resentencing based on redesignating the defendant's vacated murder conviction as a robbery without reasonable advance notice and opportunity to be heard violated his due process rights. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
R. Huffman | Aug. 4, 2023 |
20-16290
|
Brown v. Atchley
Prisoner seeking fourth federal habeas petition did not run afoul of restriction against successive applications because his present claims were not ripe during previous petitions. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
S. Ikuta | Aug. 4, 2023 |
E080076
|
Modification: People v. Superior Court (Tapia)
Unavailability of judges and courtrooms, though related to COVID, did not justify extending Penal Code Section 1382 deadline when actual cause was due to chronic backlog predating COVID. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
C. Codrington | Aug. 3, 2023 |
22-10044
|
U.S. v. Scheu
Given that defendant's actions clearly met dictionary and guideline commentary definitions of abduction, district court's application of four-level sentencing enhancement was appropriate. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
M. Hawkins | Aug. 3, 2023 |