| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
B330884
|
People v. Garcia
Peremptory challenge based on prospective juror's lack of life experience and apparent lack of confidence was proper where trial court observed the cited behavior. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
A. Gilbert | Oct. 7, 2025 |
|
E082376
|
People v. Molina
Substantial evidence supported jury's conclusion that defendant-nurse "had the care" of elder who was abused in independent living facility. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
F. Menetrez | Oct. 6, 2025 |
|
G063231
|
People v. Ramos
In Penal Code section 1172.6 resentencing hearing, even though petitioner was not a participant in codefendant's trial, transcripts from codefendant's trial identifying petitioner as the shooter were admissible. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
E. Moore | Oct. 6, 2025 |
|
F088488
|
Modification: In re Grinder
Rule prohibiting use of hearsay testimony to prove a commitment offense involved the use of force or violence was procedural, rather than substantive, and did not apply retroactively. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
D. Franson | Oct. 6, 2025 |
|
D085717
|
People v. U.S. Fire Insurance Co.
Trial court was not required to forfeit bond when defendant failed to appear for trial readiness conference because defendants may be excused from such a hearing and his counsel appeared. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
T. Do | Oct. 3, 2025 |
|
D084545
|
People v. Page
Current version of jury instruction for introducing child sexual abuse patterns of behavior expert testimony did not violate defendant's right to fair trial. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
J. Irion | Oct. 2, 2025 |
|
F088265
|
Modification: People v. Baldwin
Limiting resentencing to juvenile offenders expressly sentenced to life without the possibility of parole rather than those serving a term of years with parole eligibility did not violate equal protection. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
K. Meehan | Sep. 29, 2025 |
|
23-3969
|
U.S. v. Wells
Because defendant's retirement account required spousal consent for a lump sum withdrawal, the government was prohibited from seizing the funds for victim restitution payment. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
J. Sung | Sep. 29, 2025 |
|
E085658
|
People v. Superior Court (Lalo)
Granting discovery request pursuant to the Racial Justice Act was improper where the defendant failed to demonstrate the requisite "good cause" based on specific facts. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
D. Miller | Sep. 26, 2025 |
|
B337936
|
Ahn v. Parisotto
Despite subsequent in-the-interest-of-justice dismissal, criminal defendant's guilty plea for receiving illegal kickbacks in exchange for patient referrals meant his suspension from the workers' compensation system was statutorily required. |
Workers' Compensation, Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
A. Collins | Sep. 26, 2025 |
|
A173010
|
Hernandez v. Superior Court (People)
Defendant's case was dismissed for violating speedy trial rights when prosecutor's other case was not "in progress" under Penal Code section 1050(g)(2) and was not good cause for a continuance. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
M. Simons | Sep. 26, 2025 |
|
24-4818
|
U.S. v. Metcalf
Dismissal was required where plausible reading of state law meant defendant had no notice that his conduct potentially violated federal law prohibiting possession of firearms in school zones. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
L. VanDyke | Sep. 24, 2025 |
|
B338191
|
People v. Venancio
Resentencing petitioner was ineligible for relief as a matter of law because record of conviction showed he was convicted under a provocative act theory, which was still valid under current law. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
A. Egerton | Sep. 23, 2025 |
|
F086411
|
People v. Pierce
Reasonable jurors could have concluded defendant had implied malice where he demonstrated predrinking intent to drive and engaged in a street race with a blood-alcohol level three times the legal limit. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
J. Detjen | Sep. 19, 2025 |
|
E085719
|
Angulo v. Superior Court (People)
Under Penal Code section 1001.80, military diversion eligibility extends to any current or former service member with a qualifying service-related condition, imposing no minimum service requirement. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
D. Miller | Sep. 18, 2025 |
|
A173171
|
Mendoza v. Superior Court (People)
An arraignment or plea on an amended complaint does not restart the statutory 60-day period for holding a preliminary hearing under Penal Code section 859b. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
C. Fujisaki | Sep. 17, 2025 |
|
B335902
|
People v. Garcia
Because mental health diversion is disallowed in DUI cases, trial court did not err in denying mental health diversion for defendant when her case involved both DUI and non-DUI charges. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
G. Weingart | Sep. 17, 2025 |
|
23-4092
|
U.S. v. Boudreau
Defendant's motion to suppress was properly denied when warrant to search his residence was supported by probable cause based on his specific grooming conduct. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
D. Forrest | Sep. 17, 2025 |
|
24-2638
|
U.S. v. Patrick
Federal penalty statute allowed district court to simultaneously enter a total fine amount "due immediately" while establishing an installment schedule for payment due to defendant's indigent status. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
R. Tallman | Sep. 16, 2025 |
|
B336859
|
People v. Millsap
Trial court lacked concurrent jurisdiction to resentence criminal defendant while his automatic capital appeal was pending before the Supreme Court because it had exclusive jurisdiction over the matter. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
A. Mori | Sep. 15, 2025 |
|
B329413
|
People v. Orozco
Amending information to include conspiracy to commit murder charge right before jury selection was improper because the offense had not been shown by evidence at the preliminary hearing. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
J. Wiley | Sep. 12, 2025 |
|
A168697
|
Modification: People v. Mendez-Torres
Modified jury instruction that defined the force required for robbery without any reference to the victim's physical resistance misstated the law and required reversal. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
D. Chou | Sep. 12, 2025 |
|
B334998
|
People v. Mills
Reversal was not warranted where elderly criminal defendant with prior strikes sought reconsideration of his sentence to make him eligible for parole before the end of his life expectancy. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
K. Yegan | Sep. 11, 2025 |
|
G064274
|
People v. Ball
Felony brandishing a firearm at a person in a motor vehicle does not require a showing that the victim experienced subjective fear. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
N. Scott | Sep. 11, 2025 |
|
24-1253
|
U.S. v. Keast
District court erred when calculating defendant's sentence because his prior Oregon conviction for unlawful use of a weapon with a firearm enhancement did not constitute a "crime of violence" under the Sentencing Guidelines. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
J. Sung | Sep. 11, 2025 |
|
23-1294
|
U.S. v. Green
District court did not abuse its discretion in denying criminal defendant pre-trial discovery related to selective enforcement claim where the defendant used a small sample size to support his motion. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
K. Lee | Sep. 11, 2025 |
|
E083552
|
People v. Garcia
Trial and appellate courts lacked jurisdiction to rule on defendant's statutorily unauthorized petition to vacate fees when his conviction was final. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
A. McKinster | Sep. 10, 2025 |
|
23-1439
|
U.S. v. Stennerson
Prohibition on possession of firearms by unlawful drug users did not facially violate the Second Amendment because it was consistent with the nation's history and tradition of firearm regulations. |
Constitutional Law, Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
D. Forrest | Sep. 10, 2025 |
|
24-3374
|
Jones v. City of North Las Vegas
Though officers' warrantless backyard entry was unlawful due to their tardiness in pursuing fleeing suspect, individual officer's shooting of attacking dogs after entry was entitled to qualified immunity. |
Criminal Law and Procedure, Immunity |
|
S. Mendoza | Sep. 9, 2025 |
|
23-2282
|
U.S. v. Jesenik
Omissions tethered to affirmative misstatements to investors were sufficient to support wire fraud convictions. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
A. Hurwitz | Sep. 8, 2025 |
