Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
01-950
|
Hillside Dairy Inc. v. Lyons
State's milk pricing regulations are not exempt from scrutiny under commerce clause. |
Constitutional Law |
|
Jun. 18, 2003 | |
01-57210
|
Van Susteren v. Jones
California's disaffiliation requirement on partisan candidates does not impermissibly burden rights protected by First Amendment. |
Constitutional Law |
|
Jun. 18, 2003 | |
01-17364
|
Skaarup v. City of Las Vegas
Disciplinary action which resulted from statements challenging the City's conduct toward female employees was not an abridgment of free speech. |
Constitutional Law |
|
Jun. 16, 2003 | |
01-17430
|
Zeltser v. City of Oakland
City violated pawnbroker's due process rights by returning stolen jewelry to owner without notice. |
Constitutional Law |
|
Jun. 16, 2003 | |
00-56673
|
Deutsch v. Turner Corp.
California's statute creating right of action for slave laborers against German and Japanese corporations during World War II is unconstitutional. |
Constitutional Law |
|
Jun. 16, 2003 | |
01-17226
|
Lassonde v. Pleasanton Unified School District
School officials' censorship of proselytizing portions of student's speech was necessary to avoid violating Establishment Clause. |
Constitutional Law |
|
Jun. 15, 2003 | |
01-17065
|
Arizona Right to Life Political Action Committee v. Bayless
State law that imposes notice requirement on political speech immediately prior to election violates First Amendment. |
Constitutional Law |
|
Jun. 15, 2003 | |
99-17551
|
Nordyke v. King
Local ordinance prohibiting the possession of firearms does not infringe on right of free speech. |
Constitutional Law |
|
Jun. 10, 2003 | |
01-1444
|
Chavez v. Martinez
Self-incriminating statements obtained through coercion but not used against detainee did not lead to Fifth Amendment violation. |
Constitutional Law |
|
Jun. 3, 2003 | |
01-16565
|
Apao v. Bank of New York
Private lender's use of non-judicial foreclosure does not trigger due process protections under 14th Amendment. |
Constitutional Law |
|
May 30, 2003 | |
C037270
|
Albertson's Inc. v. Young
Grocery store is not functional equivalent of traditional public forum for purposes of free expression. |
Constitutional Law |
|
May 28, 2003 | |
01-15007
|
Bishop Paiute Tribe v. County of Inyo
County and its agents violate Paiute Tribe's sovereign immunity by obtaining and executing search warrant against tribe and tribal property. |
Constitutional Law |
|
May 26, 2003 | |
02-15378
|
California Pro-Life Council Inc. v. Getman
California may regulate express ballot-measure advocacy. |
Constitutional Law |
|
May 20, 2003 | |
01-35950
|
Miranda B. v. Kitzhaber
States do not enjoy Eleventh Amendment immunity with regards to claims under Title II of the American Disabilities Act. |
Constitutional Law |
|
May 20, 2003 | |
01-188
|
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America v. Walsh
Petitioner's showing is insufficient to support finding that Maine's prescription drug rebate program is pre-empted by Medicaid Act. |
Constitutional Law |
|
May 19, 2003 | |
01-1806
|
Illinois ex rel. Madigan v. Telemarketing Associates Inc.
States may maintain fraud actions when telemarketers make false or misleading representations designed to deceive donors. |
Constitutional Law |
|
May 13, 2003 | |
00-10599
|
U.S. v. Culliton
Questions on FAA form regarding medical conditions are not ambiguous as to preclude criminal prosecution for making false statements. |
Constitutional Law |
|
May 6, 2003 | |
01-1107
|
Virginia v. Black
State ban on cross burning meant to intimidate does not violate First Amendment. |
Constitutional Law |
|
May 2, 2003 | |
01-50495
|
U.S. v. McCoy
Possession of 'home made' pornography within state cannot be punished by law regarding interstate commerce. |
Constitutional Law |
|
Apr. 1, 2003 | |
01-1269
|
City of Cuyahoga Falls v. Buckeye Community Hope Foundation
Claim against city for injury from referendum petitioning process is not supported by proof of racially discriminatory intent. |
Constitutional Law |
|
Apr. 1, 2003 | |
C032534
|
Sanctity of Human Life Network v. California Highway Patrol
Highway patrol may prevent protesters from displaying signs on overpasses that cause freeway congestion. |
Constitutional Law |
|
Mar. 31, 2003 | |
98-35154
|
Washington Legal Foundation v. Legal Foundation of Washington
Interest on lawyers' trust accounts belongs to clients whose money is deposited; government appropriation of interest for public purposes is taking. |
Constitutional Law |
|
Mar. 31, 2003 | |
02-15385
|
Brown v. California Dept. of Transportation
Policy of permitting display of U.S. flag, but not anti-war banners, on highway overpasses is unreasonable viewpoint discrimination. |
Constitutional Law |
|
Mar. 26, 2003 | |
A093980
|
McMahon v. Albany Unified School District
Plaintiff's conduct of dumping garbage on schoolroom floor during school board meeting was sufficient for arrest and wasn't protected by First Amendment. |
Constitutional Law |
|
Mar. 26, 2003 | |
00-16778
|
Delano Farms Co. v. California Table Grape Commission
Grape growers cannot be compelled by state law to fund generic advertising for grapes. |
Constitutional Law |
|
Mar. 24, 2003 | |
02-30008
|
U.S. v. Antoine
Canadian Indian's conviction for bringing bald eagle body parts and feathers into United States didn't violate Religious Freedom Restoration Act. |
Constitutional Law |
|
Mar. 24, 2003 | |
01-35145
|
Madison v. Graham
Property owners improperly challenge Montana law on substantive due process grounds; should have made takings claim. |
Constitutional Law |
|
Mar. 21, 2003 | |
01-16505
|
Mayweathers v. Newland
Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act is constitutional exercise of Congress' spending clause authority. |
Constitutional Law |
|
Mar. 21, 2003 | |
00-17213
|
Arakaki v. State
Hawaii's requirement that trustees of Office of Hawaiian Affairs be Hawaiian violates Fifteenth Amendment and Voting Rights Act. |
Constitutional Law |
|
Mar. 21, 2003 | |
02-35530
|
Oregon Advocacy Center v. Mink
State mental hospital that refused to accept alleged criminals on timely basis violated substantive and procedural due process rights. |
Constitutional Law |
|
Mar. 18, 2003 |