Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
H046157
|
Bontilao v. Superior Court
Regardless of whether petitioner's motion was directed to trial of a criminal or civil cause, it was untimely under Code of Civil Procedure Section 170.6(2)'s all purpose rule. |
Civil Procedure |
|
A. Danner | Jul. 26, 2019 |
H045161
|
Severson & Werson v. Sephery-Fard
Under Section 527.8 of the Workplace Violence Safety Act, an employer seeking a restraining order for its employees, must provide the respondent with five days notice of the hearing. |
Civil Procedure |
|
G. Weingart | Jul. 26, 2019 |
B297658
|
Hollingsworth v. Superior Court
The superior court first assumed jurisdiction over plaintiffs' claims, so it, not the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, should determine which tribunal has exclusive jurisdiction over plaintiffs' claims. |
Civil Procedure |
|
A. Collins | Jul. 26, 2019 |
B292331
|
Cole v. Hammond
Trial court erred in denying defendants' motion for mandatory dismissal pursuant to Civil Procedure Section 583.360, and instead granting plaintiff's motion for voluntary dismissal. |
Civil Procedure |
|
A. Collins | Jul. 26, 2019 |
B293885
|
Modification: Samsky v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.
Appellant satisfied requirements of Code of Civil Procedure Section 2033.420(a) and respondent failed to meet exceptions under Section 2033.420(b), so appellant was entitled to costs of proof under Section 2033.420(a). |
Civil Procedure |
|
M. Stratton | Jul. 25, 2019 |
18-16254
|
Khrapunov v. Prosyankin
Remand was necessary for the district court to conduct additional fact-finding about foreign proceedings to determine if 28 U.S.C. Section 1782's requirements remained satisfied by plaintiff. |
Civil Procedure |
|
M. Murguia | Jul. 25, 2019 |
18-35510
|
Gemini Technologies Inc. v. Smith & Wesson Corp.
Contractual forum-selection clauses are unenforceable when enforcement would contravene a strong public policy of the forum in which the suit is being brought. |
Civil Procedure |
|
W. Fletcher | Jul. 25, 2019 |
17-17144
|
Rodriguez v. City of San Jose
Plaintiff's Second Amendment claim relating to police's seizure of firearms from her residence after her husband was detained for mental health evaluation was barred by issue preclusion. |
Civil Procedure |
|
M. Friedland | Jul. 24, 2019 |
S240245
|
Chen v. Los Angeles Truck Centers, LLC
Trial court was not required to revisit choice of law ruling which found Indiana law applied because plaintiffs' settlement with Indiana-based defendant was not such an exceptional circumstance warranting such reexamination. |
Civil Procedure |
|
M. Chin | Jul. 23, 2019 |
C082826
|
Brown v. City of Sacramento
Although plaintiff's suspension was a discrete act, plaintiff's claim based on suspension was timely because suspension only became final within the one-year statute of limitations for filing an administrative complaint. |
Civil Procedure |
|
J. Renner | Jul. 19, 2019 |
B285482
|
Nodal v. Cal-West Rain, Inc.
Juror's statements during deliberations injected opinions explicitly based on outside information that were contrary to the evidence, instructions, and theories tried and thus, influenced jurors and prejudiced plaintiff. |
Civil Procedure |
|
K. Yegan | Jul. 18, 2019 |
B282851
|
McCleery v. Allstate Ins. Co.
Plaintiffs' trial plan was properly rejected because it failed to address means to fairly establish defendants' liability on a class-wide basis as to any claim. |
Civil Procedure |
|
V. Chaney | Jul. 17, 2019 |
B283030
|
Primo Hospitality Group, Inc. v. Haney
Counsel had not yet presented complaint to the court, so service of notice of motion for sanctions under Code of Civil Procedure Section 128.7 was premature and sanctions were improper. |
Civil Procedure |
|
C. Moor | Jul. 9, 2019 |
B292417
|
Newstart Real Estate Investment LLC v. Huang
Grant of partial new trial on punitive damages vacated judgment and made it unenforceable, so denial of plaintiff's attempts to enforce full judgment including punitive damages was not improper. |
Civil Procedure |
|
E. Grimes | Jul. 8, 2019 |
D073878
|
Sweetwater Union HS Dist. v. Julian Union Elementary Sch.
Petitioner satisfied Code of Civil Procedure Section 1021.5 criteria justifying the trial court's attorney fee award, and was considered a prevailing party for fee award purposes. |
Civil Procedure |
|
G. Nares | Jul. 1, 2019 |
G054027
|
Guillory v. Hill
Plaintiff's attorney fees request was unreasonable in comparison to the actual damages award; thus, trial court properly denied request. |
Civil Procedure |
|
R. Aronson | Jun. 28, 2019 |
B293885
|
Samsky v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.
Appellant satisfied requirements of Code of Civil Procedure Section 2033.420(a) and respondent failed to meet exceptions under Section 2033.420(b), so appellant was entitled to costs of proof under Section 2033.420(a). |
Civil Procedure |
|
M. Stratton | Jun. 28, 2019 |
G054027
|
Modification: Guillory v. Hill
Plaintiff's attorney fees request was unreasonable in comparison to the actual damages award; thus, trial court properly denied request. |
Civil Procedure |
|
R. Aronson | Jun. 28, 2019 |
A154235
|
Modification: Timlick v. National Enterprise Systems, Inc.
Trial court erred in dismissing entire putative class action because defendant voluntarily gave special treatment to named plaintiff only, resulting in the elimination of her standing to maintain putative class action. |
Civil Procedure |
|
C. Fujisaki | Jun. 25, 2019 |
17-1705
|
PDR Network, LLC v. Carlton Harris Chiropractic, Inc.
The extent to which a 2006 Federal Communications Commission order interpreting the term 'unsolicited advertisement' binds lower courts may depend on the resolution of two preliminary questions; thus, matter remanded. |
Civil Procedure |
|
S. Breyer | Jun. 24, 2019 |
D075101
|
Moss v. Duncan
Two-year statute of limitations on professional negligence claim ran upon actual injury, which occurred when plaintiff and Franchise Tax Board settled, rather than its notice of proposed assessment. |
Civil Procedure |
|
P. Benke | Jun. 21, 2019 |
B285235
|
Pearl v. City of Los Angeles
Conditional order granting new trial motion unless plaintiff accepted reduction in damages was proper because trial court acted as independent factfinder and determined the amount of damages that was fair and reasonable. |
Civil Procedure |
|
D. Perluss | Jun. 20, 2019 |
B283776
|
Hanna v. Mercedes-Benz USA
Trial court erred in awarding attorney fees based on percentage-based contingency fee provision in retainer agreement between plaintiff and her counsel rather than using lodestar figure as its starting point. |
Civil Procedure |
|
D. Perluss | Jun. 20, 2019 |
A151994
|
Tanguilig v. Valdez
Under Section 15657.03 (b)(4)(A) of Elder Abuse Act, elder may seek restraining order to not only protect himself but also members of his family; thus, trial court's extension of restraining order affirmed. |
Civil Procedure |
|
T. Stewart | Jun. 20, 2019 |
H044014
|
Orozco v. WPV San Jose, LLC
When a contract is obtained by fraud, a party is entitled to rescission even if they do not suffer individual pecuniary damages. |
Civil Procedure |
|
A. Danner | Jun. 19, 2019 |
18-281
|
Virginia House of Delegates v. Bethune-Hill
Virginia House of Delegates lacked standing to appeal district court's order because it had no authority or responsibility to litigate the State's interests and lacked standing in its own right. |
Civil Procedure |
|
R. Ginsburg | Jun. 18, 2019 |
B283833
|
United Grand Corp. v. Malibu Hillbillies, LLC
Appellant's briefs generally lacked cogent legal argument, legal authority, and proper citations, and sufficient evidence supported the judgment and order of dismissal based on joint misconduct by attorney and client. |
Civil Procedure |
|
M. Stratton | Jun. 14, 2019 |
G054617
|
Modification: Bennett v. Rancho California Water Dist.
Collateral estoppel does not apply when a party obtains a favorable finding based on a lesser burden of proof in a prior proceeding than the party would bear in the subsequent proceeding. |
Civil Procedure |
|
R. Fybel | Jun. 14, 2019 |
G055381
|
Lasalle v. Vogel
Trial judge abused discretion in denying appellant's motion to set-aside default judgment; any doubts in applying Code of Civil Procedure Section 473 must be resolved in favor of party seeking relief from default. |
Civil Procedure |
|
W. Bedsworth | Jun. 13, 2019 |
B277633
|
Wertheim, LLC v. Currency Corporation
Judgment is not satisfied for purposes of postjudgment enforcement costs pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 685.080 until judgment creditor has been paid; thus, motion for postjudgment costs was timely. |
Civil Procedure |
|
V. Chaney | Jun. 10, 2019 |