| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G028751
|
Anchor Marine Repair Co. v. Magnan
Without basis for transfer or extraordinary writ, Court of Appeal lacked jurisdiction to review decision of superior court's appellate division. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Dec. 10, 2001 | |
|
F037760
|
Unnamed Physician v. Board of Trustees of St. Agnes Medical Center
Physician's appeal, following limitation of privileges, is denied because medical peer review procedures were adequately amended. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Dec. 10, 2001 | |
|
B148276
|
Blake v. Ecker
Among other things, trial court, granting defendant's motion to compel arbitration has no jurisdiction to hear defendants motion to dismiss. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Dec. 10, 2001 | |
|
00-35041
|
Columbia Basin Apartment Assn. v. City of Pasco
District court should have abstained from case while state proceedings were pending and case involved unique issues of state constitutional law. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Dec. 6, 2001 | |
|
99-17572
|
People of the State of California v. Randtron
District court properly grants motion for declaratory judgment and injunction prohibiting defendant from asserting res judicata defense in state court. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Dec. 6, 2001 | |
|
00-17330
|
United States v. Morros
District court improperly abstains from deciding whether Nevada State Engineer's denial of U.S. water permit applications is pre-empted by federal law. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Dec. 6, 2001 | |
|
E029819
|
Mares v. Baughman
Hospital is not entitled to assert lien on settlement proceeds arising from wrongful death lawsuit. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Dec. 5, 2001 | |
|
95-56823
|
Hilao v. Estate of Ferdinand E. Marcos
Federal rules don't pre-empt California execution law for service requirements for notice of levying deposit accounts. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Dec. 5, 2001 | |
|
01-8006
|
Stuart vs. Colorado Interstate Gas Co.
Wyoming resident performing work in Colorado is limited to workers' compensation remedy despite issuance of paychecks from Wyoming office. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Dec. 4, 2001 | |
|
99-55083
|
Montclair Parkowners Assn. v. City of Montclair
Pendency of parallel state proceeding challenging city's rent control ordinance is insufficient basis for dismissal of federal action under 'Younger' abstention doctrine. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Nov. 29, 2001 | |
|
99-56814
|
Metabolife International Inc. v. Wornick
Among other things, district court erred in rejecting animal studies proffered by Metabolife merely because of species gap. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Nov. 29, 2001 | |
|
B143603
|
Paykar Construction Inc. v. Spilat Construction Corp.
Collateral estoppel nor res judicata will preclude suit against general contractor who failed to show he was party to novation previously litigated. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Nov. 29, 2001 | |
|
19743-3
|
Lund v. Benham
Publication of lawsuit summons in newspaper eight days after service deadline was untimely. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Nov. 28, 2001 | |
|
B146707
|
Mehrtash v. Mehrtash
Ex-spouse who is entitled to support may not halt conveyance of house whose value exceeded mortgages, liens. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Nov. 28, 2001 | |
|
B147818
|
Alcott Rehabilitation Hospital v. Superior Court (Smith)
Patient is entitled to extension of one-year deadline to sue nursing home for medical malpractice because she is insane. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Nov. 28, 2001 | |
|
E028151
|
McFadden v. Villa
Plaintiff who wins state claim but loses federal claim cannot recover attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. Section 1988. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Nov. 28, 2001 | |
|
B142321
|
Smith v. Pacificare Behavioral Health of California Inc.
Insurer's arbitration clause is unenforceable for failing to comply with disclosure requirements. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Nov. 28, 2001 | |
|
B151526
|
Edwards v. Superior Court (Kirianoff)
Ninety-day deadline to file medical malpractice suit does not require plaintiff to allege specific factual basis of claim. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Nov. 28, 2001 | |
|
A093687
|
Mid-Century Insurance Exchange v. Daimler-Chrysler Corp.
Good faith settlement between injured and joint tortfeasor bars equitable indemnity claim of insurer previously relieved of suit. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Nov. 28, 2001 | |
|
01-0008
|
Hernandez v. State of Arizona
Notice of claim against government entity is admissible evidence for impeachment purposes. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Nov. 27, 2001 | |
|
19774-3
|
Magnussen v. Tawney
Plaintiff who received jury damages that were slightly lower than settlement offer is still entitled to attorney fees. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Nov. 26, 2001 | |
|
48428-1
|
Marina Cove Condominium Owners v. Isabella Estates
Right to judicial hearing under Washington Condominium Act cannot be waived. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Nov. 21, 2001 | |
|
00-0521
|
McEvoy v. Aerotek Inc.
Plaintiff who received jury award for less than prior settlement amount is still entitled to costs. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Nov. 21, 2001 | |
|
00CA0737
|
Singh v. Mortensun
Entry of default set aside where defendant had meritorious defense and motion to set aside was timely filed. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Nov. 20, 2001 | |
|
46876-6
|
Sanders v. AT&T Wireless Services
Plaintiff who opted out of class action has no right to intervene or appeal settlement. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Nov. 19, 2001 | |
|
00-2136
|
Joseph A. v. Ingram
Appellants' claims against state agency under Social Security Act are barred by 11th Amendment and constitutional claims barred by 'Younger' abstention doctrine. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Nov. 19, 2001 | |
|
99-5239
|
Huffman v. Saul Holdings Limited Partnership
On remand, district court doesn't have discretion to award attorney fees when appeals court in previously denied plaintiffs request for fees. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Nov. 19, 2001 | |
|
99-16184
|
S.M. v. J.K.
Magistrate judge doesn't abuse discretion in making challenged evidentiary rulings. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Nov. 19, 2001 | |
|
99-15716
|
Patelo Credit Union v. Sahni
Federal rules aren't violated when no material facts are in dispute and successor judge grants summary judgment as matter of law. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Nov. 19, 2001 | |
|
99-16133
|
Jinro America Inc. v. Secure Investments Inc.
Jury verdict against foreign company is reversed because of ethnically biased expert testimony. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Nov. 19, 2001 |