DAR

For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com

Daily appellate reports

Enewsletter Sign-up

Search Filters

Filter by date

to

Search by Case Name

Search by Judge

Search by Case Number

Search by DJ Citation Number

Search by Category

Search by Court

Case #	Name	Category	Court	Judge	Published
S057125	Birbrower, Montalbano, Condon & Frank P.C. v. Superior Court (ESQ Business Services Inc.) Law firm not licensed in California isn't entitled to fees for work done within state.	Attorneys			May 13, 1999
S057125	Birbrower, Montalbano, Condon & Frank, P.C. v. The Superior Court of Santa Clara County Law firm not licensed in California isn't entitled to fees for work done within state.	Attorneys			May 13, 1999
95-O-15585	Respondent Y. v. State Bar Attorney is required to report sanctions order notwithstanding pending appeal.	Attorneys			May 10, 1999
B108182 and B112258	Vaccaro v. Kaiman Trial court abuses discretion by dismissing action with prejudice for lack of signature on amended complaint.	Attorneys			May 10, 1999
95-R-16159	Salant v. State Bar Reinstatement is recommended for attorney after 10 years of demonstrable rehabilitation.	Attorneys			May 2, 1999
92-O-10612, 93-O-10686 and 94-O-15604	Moriarty v. State Bar Disbarment recommended for attorney who commits repeated acts of deceit over six years.	Attorneys			May 2, 1999
93-O-14534, 94-O-14813, 95-O-10936, 95-O-12847, 95-O-17260, 95-O-17874, 96-O-00264 and 96-O-00601	Doran v. State Bar Violations of fidelity to clients, combined with trust account abuses, warrant six months' actual suspension.	Attorneys			Apr. 19, 1999
A076627	Loube v. Loube Position taken by attorneys on behalf of clients isn't binding on the attorneys when later sued by clients.	Attorneys			Apr. 14, 1999
B112133	State Compensation Insurance Fund v. WPS Inc. (Telanoff) Although attorney's inadvertent disclosure of privileged information isn't a waiver, receiving attorney using the disclosure shouldn't get sanctions.	Attorneys			Apr. 14, 1999
96-O-01784	Rodriguez v. State Bar Incomplete record of proceeding before hearing judge doesn't permit independent review of discipline recommendation.	Attorneys			Apr. 12, 1999
97-1192	Swidler & Berlin v. United States Attorney-client privilege survives death of client and shields attorney notes from grand jury subpoena.	Attorneys			Apr. 11, 1999
A074636	Estate of Condon Out-of-state attorney who prepared estate in Colorado is entitled to attorney fees for services rendered in California.	Attorneys			Apr. 7, 1999
95-R-17414	Ainsworth v. State Bar Favorable testimony and sitting for legal courses isn't enough for disbarred attorney to get reinstated.	Attorneys			Apr. 5, 1999
95-C-12204	Bouyer v. State Bar Six-month actual suspension for failure to file employment tax reports is excessive.	Attorneys			Apr. 5, 1999
A078959	Evans v. Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro Plaintiffs alleging civil conspiracy against law firm and lawyer must comply with prefiling requirements for both.	Attorneys			Apr. 2, 1999
91-O-08572	Lais v. State Bar Twelve ethical violations in five matters warrant actual suspension for 90 days and until restitution paid.	Attorneys			Apr. 2, 1999
95-O-12059	Silver v. State Bar Attempts to reach stipulation regarding appropriate discipline aren't evidence in mitigation.	Attorneys			Apr. 2, 1999
S070377	Barner v. Leeds Deputy public defender sued for malpractice doesn't have discretionary immunity under Government Code.	Attorneys			Apr. 2, 1999
B112896	Crookall v. Davis, Punelli, Keathley & Willard Attorneys who didn't raise anti-deficiency statute in underlying case may have committed malpractice.	Attorneys			Apr. 1, 1999
S056954	Jordache Enterprises Inc. v. Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison Attorney's neglect of insurance coverage for third party claim causes actual injury when problem first recognized.	Attorneys			Apr. 1, 1999
B121125	Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation v. La Conchita Ranch Company Move to disqualify attorney is meritless when only a hypothetical conflict of interest exists.	Attorneys			Apr. 1, 1999
97-H-10744	Pyle v. State Bar Additional duties may be imposed on a reproval order if they're reasonably related and serve public interest.	Attorneys			Mar. 30, 1999
97-16692	Z. A. v. San Bruno Park School District Attorney fees can't be awarded to party represented by unlicensed attorney in state administrative proceedings.	Attorneys			Mar. 29, 1999
G021136	Strasbourger Pearson Tulcin Wolff Inc. v. Wiz Technology Inc. Law firm can only be disqualified for conflict of interest if it possesses confidential attorney-client information from party seeking disqualification.	Attorneys			Mar. 29, 1999
94-O-12203, 94-O-12381, 94-O-12749, 94-O-13307, 94-O-13563, 94-O-14572, 94-O-16115 & 94-O-16731	Dixon v. State Bar The magnitude of attorney's misconduct coupled with her lack of recognition of that misconduct, requires disbarment	Attorneys			Mar. 27, 1999
98-0033	Giles v. Marce Arizona law doesn't bar a claim of abuse of process against opposing counsel.	Attorneys			Mar. 24, 1999
98-0040	Speer v. Donfeld Judge abuses discretion by revoking admission pro hac vice where substantial evidence doesn't support the ruling.	Attorneys			Mar. 23, 1999
G022588	Huang v. Cheng Written notice of right to arbitrate must be served on client after fee dispute arises.	Attorneys			Mar. 22, 1999
A081771	Kaiser Foundation Hospitals v. Superior Court (Smee) Attorney-client privilege may apply to documents created during internal sexual harassment investigation.	Attorneys			Mar. 22, 1999
B117626	Manfredi & Levine v. Superior Court (Barles) Court needn't allow withdrawal based on ethical conflict if attorney won't disclose nature of conflict.	Attorneys			Mar. 19, 1999