| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 
 B299025 
 | 
State of California v. Pain Management Specialist Medical Group
 Insurance company's qui tam action against surgical center was not subject to arbitration because it was brought on behalf of the state, which was not a party to their contract.  | 
Arbitration | 
 | 
A. Gilbert | Dec. 23, 2020 | 
| 
 F078825 
 | 
Dept. of Human Resources v. International Union of Operating Engineers
 Arbitrator's conclusion that once employee requests purge of negative materials in personnel file, those files cannot be used to support adverse action violated public policy related to civil service employment.  | 
Arbitration | 
 | 
D. Franson | Dec. 21, 2020 | 
| 
 B299743 
 | 
Malek Media Group LLC v. AXQG Corp. 
 Trial court properly confirmed arbitration award because arbitrator was not required to disclose his prior relationship with LGBTQ rights organization.  | 
Arbitration | 
 | 
H. Dhanidina | Dec. 18, 2020 | 
| 
 B301929 
 | 
Garcia v. KND Development 52, LLC
 Petition to compel arbitration was properly denied because hospital failed to meet its burden in proving agent had authority to execute arbitration agreements.  | 
Arbitration | 
 | 
N. Manella | Dec. 17, 2020 | 
| 
 C089486 
 | 
Sandoval-Ryan v. Oleander Holdings
 Because there was an absence of clear and unmistakable language delegating threshold arbitrability issues to arbitrator, trial court did not err in deciding whether arbitration agreement was enforceable.  | 
Arbitration | 
 | 
E. Duarte | Dec. 9, 2020 | 
| 
 B292863 
 | 
Domestic Linen Supply Co., Inc. v. L J T Flowers, Inc. 
 Arbitration clause on reverse side of contract, after parties' signatures, in eight-point type, with no headings, italics, or boldface was inconspicuous; thus, petition to compel arbitration was properly denied.  | 
Arbitration | 
 | 
A. Gilbert | Dec. 7, 2020 | 
| 
 E072772 
 | 
Coughenour v. Del Taco 
 Defendant's motion to compel arbitration was properly denied because plaintiff did not ratify arbitration agreement by continuing to work for defendant for four months after reaching age of 18.  | 
Arbitration | 
 | 
D. Miller | Nov. 24, 2020 | 
| 
 G058323 
 | 
Brown v. TGS Management Co., LLC 
 Arbitrator exceeded his power in issuing award enforcing provisions of employment agreement which illegally restricted plaintiff's right to work.  | 
Arbitration | 
 | 
R. Aronson | Nov. 16, 2020 | 
| 
 B294975 
 | 
Swain v. Laseraway Medical Group 
 Trial court did not err in ruling defendant could not enforce arbitration agreement against plaintiff because arbitration agreement was unconscionable.  | 
Arbitration | 
 | 
J. Segal | Nov. 5, 2020 | 
| 
 A156322 
 | 
Olson v. Lyft, Inc.
 'Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLC's holding was applicable to invalidate PAGA waivers and Supreme Court's holding in 'Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis' did not overrule it.  | 
Arbitration | 
 | 
J. Richman | Nov. 2, 2020 | 
| 
 A155219 
 | 
Epstein v. Vision Service Plan 
 Health and Safety Code Section 1367 did not bar parties to network provider agreement from agreeing to arbitration in lieu of subsequent judicial review through administrative mandamus.  | 
Arbitration | 
 | 
K. Banke | Oct. 23, 2020 | 
| 
 19-55204 
 | 
Stover v. Experian Holdings
 In order to bind parties to new terms pursuant to change-of-terms provision, both parties must have notice that terms have changed and an opportunity to review those changes.  | 
Arbitration | 
 | 
M. Smith | Oct. 22, 2020 | 
| 
 18-16823 
 | 
Revitch v. DIRECTV LLC
 Arbitration agreements may not be invoked by a party's affiliate who was not an affiliate when the agreement was entered.  | 
Arbitration | 
 | 
D. O'Scannlain | Oct. 1, 2020 | 
| 
 19-55185 
 | 
SEIU Local 121RN v. Los Robles Regional Medical Center
 Pursuant to authority under 'Granite Rock Co. v. Int'l Bhd. Of Teamsters,' district court was responsible for whether grievance filed by plaintiff was arbitrable.  | 
Arbitration | 
 | 
L. VanDyke | Sep. 21, 2020 | 
| 
 18-16328 
 | 
Laver v. Credit Suisse Securities (USA)
 FINRA Rule 13204(a)(4)'s prohibition on enforcing arbitration agreements directed at class claims was inapplicable to class waivers.  | 
Arbitration | 
 | 
G. Feinerman | Sep. 21, 2020 | 
| 
 G058112 
 | 
Mejia v. DACM Inc. 
 Trial court properly found the arbitration provision unenforceable under 'McGill v. Citibank, N.A.'  | 
Arbitration | 
 | 
R. Aronson | Sep. 17, 2020 | 
| 
 19-16746 
 | 
Shivkov v. Artex Risk Solutions
 Absent Arizona authority that would subject defendants to a fiduciary duty in connection with an arbitration clause, plaintiffs failed to show that the arbitration clause was unenforceable.  | 
Arbitration | 
 | 
M. Smith | Sep. 10, 2020 | 
| 
 20-70780 
 | 
In re William Grice
 Uber driver did not fall within arbitration exemption set forth in Section 1 of Federal Arbitration Act for workers engaged in foreign or interstate commerce.  | 
Arbitration | 
 | 
C. Callahan | Sep. 8, 2020 | 
| 
 B299083 
 | 
Moritz v. Universal City Studios LLC 
 Federal Arbitration Act requires no enforcement of an arbitration provision with respect to disputes unrelated to the contract in which the provision appears.  | 
Arbitration | 
 | 
V. Chaney | Sep. 4, 2020 | 
| 
 G057919 
 | 
Rivera v. Shivers
 Trial court erred in believing that the parties stipulated to a nonbinding judicial arbitration.  | 
Arbitration | 
 | 
W. Bedsworth | Sep. 2, 2020 | 
| 
 B296738 
 | 
Conyer v. Hula Media Services, LLC 
 Trial court incorrectly denied defendant's motion to compel arbitration because plaintiff demonstrated his assent to the arbitration clause and defendant had no obligation to call plaintiff's attention to the arbitration clause.  | 
Arbitration | 
 | 
E. Grimes | Aug. 28, 2020 | 
| 
 B297824 
 | 
Williams v. 3620 W. 102nd Street, Inc. 
 State public policy prohibits arbitration provisions in residential lease agreements.  | 
Arbitration | 
 | 
J. Wiley | Aug. 26, 2020 | 
| 
 A156234 
 | 
Davis v. Kozak 
 Trial court properly denied defendants motion to compel arbitration because the arbitration agreement was both procedurally and substantively unconscionable.  | 
Arbitration | 
 | 
C. Fujisaki | Aug. 21, 2020 | 
| 
 19-35381 
 | 
Rittmann v. Amazon.com
 Amazon Flex delivery workers were exempt from Federal Arbitration Act's enforcement provisions because they were transportation workers engaged in interstate commerce under 9 U.S.C. Section 1.  | 
Arbitration | 
 | 
M. Smith | Aug. 20, 2020 | 
| 
 A156411 
 | 
Jarboe v. Hanlees Auto Group 
 Company affiliation and relatedness of arbitrable claims alone do not establish third-party beneficiary relationships or compel application of equitable estoppel.  | 
Arbitration | 
 | 
P. Siggins | Aug. 19, 2020 | 
| 
 A157688 
 | 
Oakland-Alameda County Coliseum v. Golden State Warriors
 The word 'terminates' may be interpreted as including termination by nonrenewal in licensing agreements containing debt repayment schedules.  | 
Arbitration | 
 | 
B. Jones | Aug. 19, 2020 | 
| 
 G058576 
 | 
Holley v. Silverado Senior Living Management 
 Temporary conservators lacked the power to bind conservatee to an arbitration agreement without court approval.  | 
Arbitration | 
 | 
E. Moore | Aug. 11, 2020 | 
| 
 B297070 
 | 
Bautista v. Fantasy Activewear, Inc.
 Appellant's petition to compel arbitration was denied because respondents were not acting as agents of the Labor and Workforce Development Agency when they entered into settlement agreements with appellants.  | 
Arbitration | 
 | 
V. Chaney | Jul. 28, 2020 | 
| 
 C088374 
 | 
Garner v. Inter-State Oil Co.
 Arbitration agreements must be read as whole when using the plain meaning rule to give effect to the mutual intention of the parties.  | 
Arbitration | 
 | 
L. Mauro | Jul. 24, 2020 | 
| 
 B296194 
 | 
Torrecillas v. Fitness International 
 Trial court erred in denying defendant's motion to compel arbitration because arbitration agreements between parties were not procedurally and substantively unconscionable.  | 
Arbitration | 
 | 
J. Wiley | Jul. 23, 2020 | 
