| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 
 F053553 
 | 
UAS Management Inc. v. Mater Misericordiae Hospital
 Tying sales of outpatient services with inpatient services over which hospital had monopoly in geographic market violated Cartwright Act.  | 
Antitrust | 
 | 
Jan. 13, 2009 | |
| 
 F053553 
 | 
UAS Management Inc. v. Mater Misericordiae Hospital
 Tying sales of outpatient services with inpatient services over which hospital had monopoly in geographic market violated Cartwright Act.  | 
Antitrust | 
 | 
Dec. 19, 2008 | |
| 
 06-75388 
 | 
Fones4All Corp. v. Federal Communications Commission
 Competitive local exchange carrier must exhaust administrative remedies before challenging denial of its petition for forbearance from FCC regulation.  | 
Antitrust | 
 | 
Dec. 17, 2008 | |
| 
 06-16230 
 | 
Theme Promotions Inc. v. News America Marketing FSI
 Right of first refusal agreements between publisher of coupon inserts and packaged goods companies violate California antitrust law.  | 
Antitrust | 
 | 
Oct. 13, 2008 | |
| 
 06-15636 
 | 
Centerprise International v. Micron Technology Inc.
 In antitrust case, plaintiff fails to show that higher U.S. prices for computer memory chip proximately caused its foreign injury.  | 
Antitrust | 
 | 
Oct. 10, 2008 | |
| 
 A116798 
 | 
Clayworth v. Pfizer Inc.
 Pharmacies who 'pass-on' claimed overcharges to customers are not injured by price-fixing.  | 
Antitrust | 
 | 
Aug. 20, 2008 | |
| 
 06-16230 
 | 
Theme Promotions Inc. v. News America Marketing FSI
 Right of first refusal agreements between publisher of coupon inserts and packaged goods companies violate California antitrust law.  | 
Antitrust | 
 | 
Aug. 20, 2008 | |
| 
 06-15636 
 | 
Centerprise International v. Micron Technology Inc.
 In antitrust case, plaintiff fails to show that higher U.S. prices for computer memory chip proximately caused its foreign injury.  | 
Antitrust | 
 | 
Aug. 14, 2008 | |
| 
 A116798 
 | 
Clayworth v. Pfizer Inc.
 Pharmacies who 'pass-on' claimed overcharges to customers are not injured by price-fixing.  | 
Antitrust | 
 | 
Jul. 29, 2008 | |
| 
 05-17328 
 | 
Gerlinger v. Amazon.com Inc.
 In antitrust case, plaintiff lacks Article III standing because he did not show he suffered injury-in-fact.  | 
Antitrust | 
 | 
May 27, 2008 | |
| 
 08-55105 
 | 
Delaware Valley Surgical Supply Inc. v. Johnson & Johnson
 Plaintiff lacks standing to pursue antitrust claim because it is not 'direct purchaser' of defendant's products.  | 
Antitrust | 
 | 
May 1, 2008 | |
| 
 06-35538 
 | 
Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Maleng
 Central warehousing ban, erroneously found to be hybrid restraint, is not preempted by Section 1 of Sherman Act.  | 
Antitrust | 
 | 
Apr. 2, 2008 | |
| 
 05-16549 
 | 
Kendall v. Visa U.S.A. Inc.
 Plaintiffs failed to state claim under Section 1 of Sherman Act when they did not detail specific facts of alleged conspiracy.  | 
Antitrust | 
 | 
Mar. 10, 2008 | |
| 
 05-35627 
 | 
Cascade Health Solutions v. PeaceHealth
 Bundled discounts offered by hospital care provider are not exclusionary conduct under Section 2 of Sherman Act unless they are predatory.  | 
Antitrust | 
 | 
Feb. 4, 2008 | |
| 
 06-35538 
 | 
Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Maleng
 Central warehousing ban, erroneously found to be hybrid restraint, is not preempted by Section 1 of Sherman Act.  | 
Antitrust | 
 | 
Jan. 30, 2008 | |
| 
 05-55367 
 | 
Wah Chang v. Duke Energy Trading Marketing LLC
 Filed rate doctrine bars electricity purchaser's suit against energy companies whose market manipulation resulted in unfair tariffs set by FERC.  | 
Antitrust | 
 | 
Nov. 20, 2007 | |
| 
 05-15676 
 | 
Sanders v. Brown
 Plaintiff fails to allege that state statutes mandate conduct that in all cases violates federal antitrust law.  | 
Antitrust | 
 | 
Sep. 26, 2007 | |
| 
 05-17352 
 | 
E. & J. Gallo Winery v. EnCana Corp.
 Natural gas supplier's motion for summary judgment is properly denied where wine producer's claims are not necessarily barred by filed rate doctrine.  | 
Antitrust | 
 | 
Sep. 19, 2007 | |
| 
 05-56023 
 | 
LinkLine Communications Inc. v. SBC California Inc.
 Internet Service Provider, alleging supplier and competitor's pricing scheme creates anticompetitive price squeeze, states potentially valid claim under Sherman Antitrust Act.  | 
Antitrust | 
 | 
Sep. 11, 2007 | |
| 
 05-35627 
 | 
Cascade Health Solutions v. PeaceHealth
 Bundled discounts offered by hospital care provider are not exclusionary conduct under Section 2 of Sherman Act unless they are predatory.  | 
Antitrust | 
 | 
Sep. 5, 2007 | |
| 
 06-480 
 | 
Leegin Creative Leather Products Inc. v. PSKS Inc.
 In antitrust case, rule of reason is found to be proper standard for testing vertical price restraints.  | 
Antitrust | 
 | 
Jun. 28, 2007 | |
| 
 A112591 
 | 
Belton v. Comcast Cable Holdings LLC.
 Comcast offer of music services only as part of basic cable tier package is not unfair tying arrangement under Unruh Act.  | 
Antitrust | 
 | 
Jun. 11, 2007 | |
| 
 A112591 
 | 
Belton v. Comcast Cable Holdings LLC.
 Comcast offer of music services only as part of basic cable tier package is not unfair tying arrangement under Unruh Act.  | 
Antitrust | 
 | 
Jun. 10, 2007 | |
| 
 B187172 
 | 
Lori Rubinstein Physical Therapy Inc. v. PTPN Inc.
 With passage of Insurance Code Section 10133, Legislature has immunized certain conduct of health insurer and group of providers from antitrust liability.  | 
Antitrust | 
 | 
Mar. 23, 2007 | |
| 
 05-381 
 | 
Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Ross-Simmons Hardwood Lumber Co.
 Because predatory-bidding and predatory-pricing involve unilateral pricing measures in order to achieve supracompetitive profits, similar legal standards apply to both.  | 
Antitrust | 
 | 
Mar. 14, 2007 | |
| 
 03-35669 
 | 
Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians of Oregon v. Weyerhauser Company
 Predatory bidding can be shown without evidence that buyer operated at loss and dangerous probability of recouping losses existed.  | 
Antitrust | 
 | 
Mar. 7, 2007 | |
| 
 02-56509 
 | 
Dagher v. Saudi Refining Inc.
 Gas station owners may sue oil companies for fixing prices in violation of Sherman Act.  | 
Antitrust | 
 | 
Jun. 18, 2006 | |
| 
 04-805 
 | 
Texaco Inc. v. Dagher
 Gasoline service station owners' antitrust claim cannot prevail where pricing decisions of legitimate joint venture are not per se unlawful.  | 
Antitrust | 
 | 
Mar. 23, 2006 | |
| 
 B168079 
 | 
Eddins v. Sumner Redstone
 Unfair Practices Act applied to video rental retailers' claim that their distributors did not receive same terms as well-known retailer.  | 
Antitrust | 
 | 
Feb. 6, 2006 | |
| 
 04-905 
 | 
Volvo Trucks North America Inc. v. Reeder-Simco GMC Inc.
 Dealer does not state claim for secondary price discrimination for specially ordered products where evidence of head-on-head transactions reveal no substantial competitive injury.  | 
Antitrust | 
 | 
Feb. 5, 2006 | 
