| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 
 09-17251 
 | 
Noble v. Adams
 Prison officials are entitled to qualified immunity where decision to prolong restriction on prisoners' outdoor exercise following major riot was not deliberately indifferent.  | 
Prisoners Rights | 
 | 
Aug. 3, 2011 | |
| 
 09-55233 
 | 
Starr v. Baca
 Sheriff may be liable for constitutional violations of subordinates because failure to act in stopping conduct shows deliberate indifference.  | 
Prisoners Rights | 
 | 
Jul. 26, 2011 | |
| 
 09-16404 
 | 
McCollum v. California Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation
 Minister-plaintiff asserting violation of inmates’ right to free exercise of religion lacks standing where inmates are able to assert own claims.  | 
Prisoners Rights | 
 | 
Jun. 2, 2011 | |
| 
 09-1233 
 | 
Brown v. Plata
 Three-judge court properly orders reduction of prison population necessary to remedy violations of prisoners’ rights under Prison Litigation Reform Act.  | 
Prisoners Rights | 
 | 
May 24, 2011 | |
| 
 09-17251 
 | 
Noble v. Adams
 Prison officials are entitled to qualified immunity where decision to prolong restriction on prisoners' outdoor exercise following major riot was not deliberately indifferent.  | 
Prisoners Rights | 
 | 
Mar. 18, 2011 | |
| 
 09-35815 
 | 
Reeb v. Thomas
 Federal court review of Bureau of Prisons' determination to expel prisoner from residential drug abuse program is precluded by statute.  | 
Prisoners Rights | 
 | 
Mar. 4, 2011 | |
| 
 09-55233 
 | 
Starr v. Baca
 Sheriff may be liable for constitutional violations of subordinates because failure to act in stopping conduct shows deliberate indifference.  | 
Prisoners Rights | 
 | 
Feb. 14, 2011 | |
| 
 09-16539 
 | 
Dickens v. Brewer
 Lethal injection protocol does not amount to constitutional violation absent showing of substantial risk of serious harm despite protocol safeguards.  | 
Prisoners Rights | 
 | 
Feb. 10, 2011 | |
| 
 09-15768 
 | 
Hrdlicka v. Reniff
 Summary judgment is improper where exercise of inmate’s constitutional right to receive publication raises question of material fact regarding adverse impact on jail.  | 
Prisoners Rights | 
 | 
Feb. 1, 2011 | |
| 
 E050459 
 | 
In re Espinoza
 In considering family visitation request by inmate with prior institutional narcotics trafficking convictions, time limitation for relevance of disciplinary actions does not exist.  | 
Prisoners Rights | 
 | 
Jan. 28, 2011 | |
| 
 09-17185 
 | 
Perez v. Cate
 Separately billed paralegal services are included within attorney fees under Prison Litigation Reform Act, subject to same hourly rate percentage.  | 
Prisoners Rights | 
 | 
Jan. 14, 2011 | |
| 
 09-15236 
 | 
Hamilton v. Brown
 Compulsory blood sample taken from prisoner for DNA analysis does not violate Fourth Amendment.  | 
Prisoners Rights | 
 | 
Jan. 4, 2011 | |
| 
 10-35553 
 | 
Sacora v. Thomas
 Bureau of Prison’s determination of six-month placement for typical inmate in residential re-entry center is valid under Second Chance Act of 2007.  | 
Prisoners Rights | 
 | 
Dec. 6, 2010 | |
| 
 07-17265 
 | 
Hebbe v. Pliler
 Inmate’s inability to access prison law library during 30-day lockdown to research issues of his appeal violates right to access courts.  | 
Prisoners Rights | 
 | 
Nov. 21, 2010 | |
| 
 08-17601 
 | 
Graves v. Arpaio
 Pre-trial detainees taking psychotropic medications may not be housed in high temperature areas increasing risk of heat-related illness.  | 
Prisoners Rights | 
 | 
Oct. 13, 2010 | |
| 
 05-15745 
 | 
Sapp v. Kimbrell
 Prisoner is not excused from administrative remedy exhaustion requirement where he fails to show improper screening of grievances before filing suit.  | 
Prisoners Rights | 
 | 
Sep. 28, 2010 | |
| 
 07-17156 
 | 
Ward v. Ryan
 'Gate money’ does not violate prisoner’s Fifth Amendment rights because prisoner does not have current possessory interest in funds.  | 
Prisoners Rights | 
 | 
Sep. 28, 2010 | |
| 
 08-15957 
 | 
Dunn v. Castro
 No due process violation exists where prison officials have reasonable basis for restricting inmate’s visitation privileges.  | 
Prisoners Rights | 
 | 
Sep. 15, 2010 | |
| 
 08-16363 
 | 
Rhodes v. Robinson
 Under Prison Litigation Reform Act, new claims alleged in second amended complaint need not be exhausted administratively before original complaint was filed.  | 
Prisoners Rights | 
 | 
Sep. 9, 2010 | |
| 
 09-17144 
 | 
Armstrong v. Schwarzenegger
 State cannot avoid its obligations to provide accommodations to disabled inmates and parolees by contracting with third party to perform its functions.  | 
Prisoners Rights | 
 | 
Sep. 8, 2010 | |
| 
 07-17265 
 | 
Hebbe v. Pliler
 Inmate’s inability to access prison law library during 30-day lockdown to research issues of his appeal violates right to access courts.  | 
Prisoners Rights | 
 | 
Aug. 2, 2010 | |
| 
 07-17265 
 | 
Hebbe v. Pliler
 Inmate’s inability to access prison law library during 30-day lockdown to research issues of his appeal violates right to access courts.  | 
Prisoners Rights | 
 | 
Jul. 30, 2010 | |
| 
 09-15522 
 | 
Thomas v. Ponder
 Prison officials are aware of consequences to prisoner’s health where they deny prisoner access to outdoor exercise for extended time period.  | 
Prisoners Rights | 
 | 
Jul. 19, 2010 | |
| 
 08-17231 
 | 
Kimbrough v. State of California, Dept. of Corrections
 Inmate is not entitled to attorney fees where issuance of preliminary injunction did not establish that State violated his protected rights.  | 
Prisoners Rights | 
 | 
Jun. 28, 2010 | |
| 
 C062967 
 | 
In re Maes
 Convicted murderer to serve determinate sentence for spousal abuse first, before indeterminate life term, is not eligible for postsentence conduct credit.  | 
Prisoners Rights | 
 | 
Jun. 23, 2010 | |
| 
 F058113 
 | 
In re Furnace
 Sufficient evidence based on independent source items exists to validate individual as member of prison gang.  | 
Prisoners Rights | 
 | 
Jun. 14, 2010 | |
| 
 08-15657 
 | 
Randle v. Crawford
 State did not waive statute of limitations defense for failure to raise issue where prior filings were not responsive pleadings.  | 
Prisoners Rights | 
 | 
May 16, 2010 | |
| 
 07-15023 
 | 
Harvey v. Jordan
 Prisoner exhausts administrative process under Prison Litigation Reform Act when officials granted relief that resolved his due process grievance to his satisfaction.  | 
Prisoners Rights | 
 | 
May 11, 2010 | |
| 
 07-35866 
 | 
Florer v. Congregation Pidyon Shevuyim
 Private company is state actor where it contracts with Dept. of Corrections to provide prisoners access to religious services.  | 
Prisoners Rights | 
 | 
May 6, 2010 | |
| 
 08-56423 
 | 
Khatib v. County of Orange
 Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act does not cover persons confined in courthouse holding cells.  | 
Prisoners Rights | 
 | 
May 4, 2010 | 
