| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
F028505
|
People v. Mackey
In determining validity of defendant's prior conviction, jury can also consider other official documents directly related to prior conviction. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 11, 2000 | |
|
99-5120
|
U.S. v. Rodriguez-Moreno
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 10, 2000 | |
|
99-0562
|
State v. Paleo
Prosecutor's race neutral explanation for peremptory challenge is not enough to disprove discriminatory motive. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 10, 2000 | |
|
99-4004
|
U.S. v. Saldana-Duarte
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 10, 2000 | |
|
99-3224
|
U.S. v. Segraves
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 10, 2000 | |
|
99-3266
|
U.S. v. Lee
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 10, 2000 | |
|
99-6369
|
U.S. v. Fox
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 10, 2000 | |
|
99-7118
|
Cox v. Kaiser
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 10, 2000 | |
|
99-1478
|
Garner v. Pugh
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 10, 2000 | |
|
99-4219
|
U.S. v. Leon-Munoz
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 10, 2000 | |
|
98-50293
|
United States v. Nesenblatt
The federal Sentencing Guidelines permit enhancement of sentence based upon amount of money obtained from offense. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 10, 2000 | |
|
99-2136
|
U.S. v. Maldonaldo-Acosta
Court may not reduce defendant's sentence without motion from government seeking reduction. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 9, 2000 | |
|
98-0587
|
Logerquist v. McVey
Court errs in conducting hearing on admissibility of expert testimony regarding repressed memory. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 9, 2000 | |
|
99-0105
|
State v. Marshall
Criminal statute protecting children from sexual exploitation includes conduct by defendant compelling an act of self-masturbation by child. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 9, 2000 | |
|
99-1415
|
U.S. v. Arevalo-Tavares
Defendant waives right to appeal deportation order where he fails to timely appeal after being notified to do so. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 9, 2000 | |
|
99-2006
|
U.S. v. Mackovich
Court did not commit judicial error finding defendant diagnosed with mental disorder competent to stand trial. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 9, 2000 | |
|
99-2165
|
U.S. v. Hudson
Routine border stop at fixed checkpoint is not custodial and therefore does not require Miranda warnings. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 9, 2000 | |
|
99-1370
|
Spangle v. Warden Holt
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 9, 2000 | |
|
99-6213
|
Hudson v. Norick
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 9, 2000 | |
|
99-1262
|
Alexander v. U.S. parole Commission
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 9, 2000 | |
|
99-1451
|
U.S. v. Williams
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 9, 2000 | |
|
99-6432
|
Spells v. Kaiser
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 9, 2000 | |
|
99-7153
|
Atkins v. Boone
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 9, 2000 | |
|
00-6003
|
Clark v. Fleming
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 9, 2000 | |
|
99-6424
|
Cathcart v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 9, 2000 | |
|
99-5052
|
U.S. v. Custer
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 9, 2000 | |
|
A076543
|
People v. Woods
Officer cannot enter residence to determine whether individual is violating probation, regardless of officer's subjective intent. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 8, 2000 | |
|
S075029
|
People v. Wernicke
Review granted |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 8, 2000 | |
|
S068741
|
People v. Woods
Officer cannot enter residence to determine whether individual is violating probation, regardless of officer's subjective intent. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 7, 2000 | |
|
98-6322
|
Slack v. McDaniel
Habeas petitioner appealing dismissal after Death Penalty Act's effective date must first obtain certificate of appealability. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 7, 2000 |