| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
99-10333
|
U.S. v. Reyna
Judge's approval of wiretap before Attorney General has authorized application violates federal wiretap statute. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 15, 2000 | |
|
99-10170
|
U.S. v. Valensia
'Preponderance of evidence' is proper standard for factual determinations regarding sentence enhancements that are not extremely disproportionate. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 15, 2000 | |
|
99-10243
|
U.S. v. Rivera-Sanchez
Reference to sentence enhancement when conviction is on single count of one crime should be struck as clerical error. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 15, 2000 | |
|
99-50068
|
U.S. v. Zamora-Hernandez
District court does not abuse its discretion by denying pre-trial continuance for obtaining transcripts when denial does not prejudice defense. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 15, 2000 | |
|
99-2331 and 99-2367
|
Lopez v. Lytle
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 15, 2000 | |
|
98-0540
|
Benitez v. The Honorable Thomas Dunevant III (Phoenix City Prosecutor's Office)
Driving on suspended license for DUI does not rise to level of moral deficiency required for jury trial. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 15, 2000 | |
|
99-4216
|
U.S. v. Houston
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 15, 2000 | |
|
99-1544
|
U.S. v. King
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 15, 2000 | |
|
99-6439
|
Mann v. Young
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 15, 2000 | |
|
00-3016
|
Kaiser v. Nelson
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 15, 2000 | |
|
99-4241
|
U.S. v. Vasquez-Soto
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 15, 2000 | |
|
00-4017
|
Fernandez v. Galetka
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 15, 2000 | |
|
99-3214
|
Ferguson v. McKune
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 15, 2000 | |
|
98-30221
|
U.S. v. Haynes
Misconduct does not warrant dismissal of indictment when government informant is agent of defense counsel and reveals privileged information. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 14, 2000 | |
|
99-2316
|
U.S. v. Pena
Court may impose separate enhancements for use of force and because the victim was under the age of twelve. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 8, 2000 | |
|
99-6147
|
Valdez v. Ward
Accused does not present clear and convincing evidence that he did not understand Miranda rights that were read to him in English. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 8, 2000 | |
|
00-7029
|
July v. Champion
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 8, 2000 | |
|
99-3277
|
U.S. v. Ramstad
Court must make specific findings when it denies suppression motion. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 8, 2000 | |
|
00-2145
|
Rael v. Williams
Claim challenging conditions of privately run prison facility is not a cognizable habeas claim. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 8, 2000 | |
|
99-6315
|
U.S. v. Wells
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 8, 2000 | |
|
99-3144 and 99-3154
|
U.S. v. Allerheiligen
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 8, 2000 | |
|
99-7038
|
McGregor v. Gibson
Accused fails to raise bona fide doubt about competency despite having lengthy history of mental illness and psychiatric treatment. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 8, 2000 | |
|
99-8078
|
U.S. v. McAleer
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 8, 2000 | |
|
99-6279
|
U.S. v. Brumett
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 8, 2000 | |
|
99-1545
|
U.S. v. Blatter
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 8, 2000 | |
|
99-6340
|
U.S. v. Jenkins
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 8, 2000 | |
|
99-6349 & 99-6375
|
Jackson v. Hargett
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 8, 2000 | |
|
98-4203
|
U.S. v. Stringer
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 8, 2000 | |
|
00-2000
|
U.S. v. Carter
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 8, 2000 | |
|
00-5066
|
U.S. v. Fanning
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 8, 2000 |