| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
B131007
|
People v. Beltran
Great bodily injury sentence enhancement is not applicable when great bodily injury is element of underlying felony. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 31, 2000 | |
|
F033118
|
People v. Brown
Jury instruction that 'possession of contraband is not unlawful if possession is solely for purpose of disposal' does not apply to incarcerated inmates. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 31, 2000 | |
|
B126876
|
People v. Perez
Confrontation clause is not violated when witness testifies she cannot recall events and prior contrary statements are admitted. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 31, 2000 | |
|
98-50639
|
U.S. v. Mezas de Jesus
Clear and convincing evidence standard applies when sentence enhancement is based on uncharged offense. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 31, 2000 | |
|
98-35919
|
Lajoie v. Thompson
Sixth Amendment right to confrontation and compulsory process is violated when evidence of minor victim's prior sexual abuse by others is disallowed. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 31, 2000 | |
|
98-10491
|
U.S. v. Granville
Evidence discovered by officers who violated 'knock and announce' statute by prematurely breaking down suspect's door should be suppressed. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 31, 2000 | |
|
S089345
|
In re Rodriguez
Counsel's motion to withdraw guilty plea, causing enhanced sentencing, is not ineffective assistance when court could vacate plea on its own. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 31, 2000 | |
|
99-0136
|
State v. Thompson
Prior felony convictions are not 'historical prior felonies' when accused is not sentenced on priors before commit-ting present offense. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 30, 2000 | |
|
99-10284
|
U.S. v. Ceron-Sanchez
Aggravated felony qualifies as crime of violence for purpose of increasing base level offense in sentencing convicted illegal alien. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 30, 2000 | |
|
99-30296
|
U.S. v. Andra
Tax liabilities of individuals advised to illegally evade tax assessment and collection are properly included in calculation of tax loss for sentencing purposes. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 30, 2000 | |
|
98-0422
|
Shane B., a Minor.
Prohibition against retroactive application of law does not apply when law is purely procedural. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 30, 2000 | |
|
S070946
|
People v. Rathert
Review granted |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 30, 2000 | |
|
98-50631
|
U.S. v. Poehlman
Government entraps one who is not predisposed to engaging in sex with minors when government induces person through protracted, aggressive e-mail. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 30, 2000 | |
|
97-50635
|
U.S. v. Campos
Unstipulated polygraph evidence concerning defendant's mental state is inadmissible when it involves ultimate issue of mens rea. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 30, 2000 | |
|
99-10270
|
U.S. v. Benavidez
If unstipulated polygraph evidence is more prejudicial than probative and without further evidentiary analysis, it is properly excluded. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 30, 2000 | |
|
99-10171
|
U.S. v. Smith
Court's refusal to give jury instruction regarding the defense theory and prosecutor's misstatement of law is grounds for reversal. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 30, 2000 | |
|
99-10295
|
U.S. v. Williams
Court may consider actions as relevant for sentencing purposes that my be barred from prosecution under the statute of limitations. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 30, 2000 | |
|
G023714
|
People v. Mooc
Cross examination about absent third party's statements and failure to divulge officer's entire personnel record result in unfair trial. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 30, 2000 | |
|
E025259
|
People v. Matelski
Warrant to search for contraband founded on probable cause implicitly carries with it limited authority to detain occupants of premises while proper search is conducted. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 30, 2000 | |
|
A088519
|
People v. Frawley
Dismissal of a prior conviction is not an expungement and doesn't prevent ex-felon from being prosecuted for possession of nonconcealable firearm. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 30, 2000 | |
|
F033118
|
People v. Brown
Jury instruction that 'possession of contraband is not unlawful if possession is solely for purpose of disposal' does not apply to incarcerated inmates. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 30, 2000 | |
|
B136294
|
People v. Downey Jr.
Trial court may deny reinstatement of probation so long as decision does not exceed the bounds of reason. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 30, 2000 | |
|
E025274
|
People v. Cain
Defendant does not have right to confront victim's psychotherapist at restitution hearing. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 30, 2000 | |
|
E025274
|
People v. Cain
Defendant does not have right to confront victim's psychotherapist at restitution hearing. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 30, 2000 | |
|
B123823
|
People v. Mitchell
Defendant cannot be punished twice for different convictions arising from same criminal acts; convictions from same conduct can be treated as separate 'strike.' |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 30, 2000 | |
|
S081186
|
Stroud v. Superior Court (People)
Magistrate's one-day absence from preliminary examination to attend Judicial Council meeting is not grounds to dismiss a complaint. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 30, 2000 | |
|
S013187
|
People v. Kraft
Supreme Court upholds death penalty for murderer of 16 young males, six of whom were U.S. Marines. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 30, 2000 | |
|
S013187
|
People v. Kraft
Supreme Court upholds death penalty for murderer of 16 young males, six of whom were U.S. Marines. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 30, 2000 | |
|
S012568
|
People v. Lucero
California Supreme Court affirms death penalty for convicted murderer. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 30, 2000 | |
|
99-50587
|
U.S. v. Alatorre
Separate hearing outside presence of jury to asses relevance and reliability of expert testimony is not required. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 29, 2000 |