| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
S085029
|
People v. Palmer
Inconsistent verdicts in conspiracy case does not require reversal of co-defendant's conspiracy conviction when substantial evidence supports verdict. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jan. 17, 2001 | |
|
99-56405
|
Jones v. Smith
Discrepancy between jury instruction on premeditation and omission of premeditated charge is variance, not amendment and therefore does not violate Sixth Amendment. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jan. 17, 2001 | |
|
F031299
|
People v. Maloy
Ex Post Facto Clause isn't violated by reviving expired limitations period when statute doesn't retroactively increase punishment for past crime. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jan. 16, 2001 | |
|
C028898
|
People v. Posas
Defendant isn't entitled to change of plea since written advisement of immigration consequences after conviction is sufficient. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jan. 16, 2001 | |
|
H018163
|
People v. Tobias
Ex post facto clause isn't violated by reviving expired limitation period in criminal statute. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jan. 16, 2001 | |
|
S078845
|
People v. Tobias
Review granted |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jan. 16, 2001 | |
|
S081558
|
People v. Woo
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jan. 16, 2001 | |
|
S080554
|
People v. Posas
Review granted |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jan. 16, 2001 | |
|
S070875
|
People v. Palumbo
Review granted |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jan. 16, 2001 | |
|
D026419
|
People v. Palumbo
Failure to specify degree of murder in felony murder verdict doesn't require reduction to second degree. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jan. 16, 2001 | |
|
00-8030
|
U.S. v. Marin
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jan. 16, 2001 | |
|
00-6142
|
Rittenhouse v. Hudson
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jan. 16, 2001 | |
|
00-4033
|
U.S. v. Navarrette-Dominguez
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jan. 16, 2001 | |
|
00-3099
|
Jones v. Hannigan
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jan. 16, 2001 | |
|
00-5155
|
Shaffer v. Boone
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jan. 16, 2001 | |
|
00-3183
|
U.S. v. Khleang
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jan. 16, 2001 | |
|
00-6045
|
Burns v. Great Lakes Higher Education Corp.
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jan. 16, 2001 | |
|
00-8023
|
U.S. v. Ulloa-Porras
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jan. 16, 2001 | |
|
00-2228
|
U.S. v. Estrada-Hermosillo
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jan. 16, 2001 | |
|
00-2235
|
Jordan v. Williams
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jan. 16, 2001 | |
|
H017172
|
People v. Lee
Ex post facto principles bar statutory revival of an expired criminal statute of limitations. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jan. 15, 2001 | |
|
S071007
|
People v. Lee
Review granted |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jan. 15, 2001 | |
|
99-0781
|
State v. Purcell
Catholic juror was excluded from trial for first degree murder based on opposition to death penalty, not religion. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jan. 15, 2001 | |
|
A086336
|
In re Joseph F.
Police officer did not use excessive force in restraining juvenile on middle school grounds without permission. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jan. 15, 2001 | |
|
95-30158
|
U.S. v. Ramirez
Police cannot ignore knock and announce rule in executing warrant when no exigent circumstances exist. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jan. 12, 2001 | |
|
00-1148
|
U.S. v. Rojas-Mendoza
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jan. 12, 2001 | |
|
00-2048
|
U.S. v. Lahi
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jan. 12, 2001 | |
|
99-1397
|
U.S. v. Bustillos-Munoz
Drugs found in car during traffic stop are admissible because officer had reasonable belief that traffic violation occurred. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jan. 12, 2001 | |
|
99-6209
|
U.S. v. Keeling
Accused's five-year supervised release term is improper. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jan. 12, 2001 | |
|
99-2337
|
U.S. v. Kelly
Courts should not treat prisoner motions as Section 2255 motions unless movant agrees to recharacterization or is given opportunity to withdraw motion. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jan. 12, 2001 |