| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
99CA0051
|
People v. Laurson
Self-defense instruction not required absent evidence that victims acted aggressively toward defendant. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 7, 2001 | |
|
98CA2037
|
People v. McDonald
Proponent of summaries of hospital records required to pay for redaction of the records under CRE 1006. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 7, 2001 | |
|
98CA1000
|
People v. Parsons
Miranda advisement not required when inmate interviewed in correctional facility. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 7, 2001 | |
|
99-1583
|
US v. Vogl
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 7, 2001 | |
|
00-3083
|
Trumbly v. Kansas Parole Board
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 7, 2001 | |
|
00-0089
|
Gusler v. Wilkinson
Trial court's declaration of mistrial premature and double jeopardy clause forbids retrial. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 7, 2001 | |
|
S077178
|
People v. Smith
Review granted |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 6, 2001 | |
|
B114899
|
People v. Tindall
State can amend information to allege three prior 'strike' convictions even after discharge of jury. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 6, 2001 | |
|
G022487
|
People v. Bucy
Amendment extending time to file felony complaint, adopted after limitation period has run, violates ex post facto clause of the U.S. Constitution. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 6, 2001 | |
|
S085345
|
People v. Leyran
Review granted |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 6, 2001 | |
|
00-6234
|
Daniel v. Scott
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 6, 2001 | |
|
00-6272
|
Jaquez v. Oklahoma
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 6, 2001 | |
|
01-1075
|
U.S. v. Challoner
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 6, 2001 | |
|
99-3017
|
U.S. v. O'Bryan
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 6, 2001 | |
|
00-5067
|
U.S. v. Barajas
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 6, 2001 | |
|
00-5208
|
Brown v. Gibson
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 6, 2001 | |
|
99-2309
|
Ward v. Williams
State court does not violate double jeopardy when defendant does not have legitimate expectation of finality in his sentence. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 6, 2001 | |
|
00-2183
|
Harris v. Williams
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 6, 2001 | |
|
00-0482
|
Arizona v. Estrada
Court does not violate defendant's due process rights by finding aggravating factor not expressly alleged in prosecutor's sentencing memo. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 6, 2001 | |
|
00-0010
|
State v. Guillory
Defendant isn't eligible for probation because of his prior convictions for possession of and conspiracy to possess narcotic drugs. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 6, 2001 | |
|
99-0508
|
State v. Ossana
Court erred in imposing concurrent term when prior conviction was for attempted possession of narcotics. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 6, 2001 | |
|
99-8099
|
U.S. v. Cestnik
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 6, 2001 | |
|
99-4015
|
U.S. v. Andas-Gallardo
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 6, 2001 | |
|
00-1355
|
Moyer v. People of the State of Colorado
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 6, 2001 | |
|
00-0117
|
Arizona v. Powers
Defendant cannot be convicted on two counts of leaving scene of accident when he only leaves scene once even if there are multiple victims. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 6, 2001 | |
|
99CA2524
|
People v. Martinez
Heat of passion second degree murder constitutes crime of violence for sentencing purposes. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 6, 2001 | |
|
98-6487
|
U.S. v. Jackson
Any evidence that allows for sentence enhancements must individually be raised before jury and proven beyond reasonable doubt. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 6, 2001 | |
|
00-6159
|
Garrison v. Saffle
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 6, 2001 | |
|
00-3130
|
U.S. v. Chandler III
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 6, 2001 | |
|
00-5086
|
U.S. v. Tuter
Good faith exception to exclusionary rule applies where government agents reasonably relied on magistrate's authorization of search warrant. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 6, 2001 |