For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Read Today's Digital Edition
Place Your Legal Notices
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court

Name Category Published
Lankford v. Novac
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Apr. 11, 2001
U.S. v. Tonche
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Apr. 11, 2001
U.S. v. McGowan
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Apr. 11, 2001
Lynn v. McClain
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Apr. 11, 2001
Stewart v. Hill
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Apr. 11, 2001
State v. Farley
Due process requires proving every element of offense beyond reasonable doubt, it does not require proving absence of affirmative defense. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Apr. 11, 2001
U.S. v. Whitehead
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Apr. 11, 2001
Russell M., a Minor
Courts have no discretion in sentencing repeat juvenile felons to juvenile intensive probation. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Apr. 11, 2001
U.S. v. Sandoval
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Apr. 10, 2001
U.S. v. Walsh
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Apr. 10, 2001
U.S. v. Vaksdal
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Apr. 10, 2001
Stouffer v. Saffle
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Apr. 10, 2001
U.S. v. Christakis
Attorney may have created conflict by simultaneously representing two defendants regarding same crime. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Apr. 10, 2001
U.S. v. Morgan
Court errs in considering only beatings of victim and not their deprivations as relevant injuries for purposes of increasing offense level. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Apr. 10, 2001
US. v. Tavakkoly
Prosecutor questioning witness solely about his criminal history and agreement to testify in exchange for lenient sentence is not vouching for witness. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Apr. 10, 2001
Odle v. Woodford
Failure to hold hearing to determine defendant's competency to stand trial when evidence of mental impairment exists is denial of due process. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Apr. 10, 2001
U.S. v. Henley
Court must determine whether defendant's attempt to bribe juror entitles co-defendants to new trial. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Apr. 10, 2001
U.S. v. Arnold
Whether judge's physical absence from proceedings during jury deliberations constitutes error and violates defendants Sixth Amendment right depends on particular facts of each case. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Apr. 10, 2001
U.S. v. Arnold
Whether judge's physical absence from proceedings during jury deliberations constitutes error and violates defendants Sixth Amendment right depends on particular facts of each case. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Apr. 10, 2001
Montoya v. Romero
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Apr. 10, 2001
U.S. v. Harding
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Apr. 10, 2001
U.S. v. Lucero
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Apr. 10, 2001
Baker v. Keating
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Apr. 10, 2001
State v. Newton
Sentencing should follow statutes in place at time of current offense. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Apr. 10, 2001
Antwon R., a Minor
Juvenile court errs by failing to calculate minor's precommitment custody credit. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Apr. 9, 2001
People v. Strong
Strike will be upheld unless defendant can show that he is outside spirit and intent of Three Strikes law. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Apr. 9, 2001
Texas v. Cobb
Defendant's murder confession is admissible even though he was represented by counsel for burglary charge. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Apr. 8, 2001
U.S. v. Hayes
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Apr. 4, 2001
U.S. v. Harris
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Apr. 4, 2001
U.S. v. Cuevas
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Apr. 4, 2001
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.