For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Read Today's Digital Edition
Place Your Legal Notices
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court

Name Category Published
State v. Gibson
Officer did not conduct unreasonable, warrantless search where defendant was under the influence of marijuana and minor children were present. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 7, 2001
State v. Donahue
Results of blood-alcohol test taken in Oregon are admissible in Washington because they didn't violate Oregon's physician-patient privilege. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 7, 2001
People v. Morrison
Defendant does not have to use preemptory strike against objectionable juror to preserve claim that right to fair trial violated. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 7, 2001
U.S. v. Velarde-Gomez
In federal criminal prosecution, prosecutor may elicit testimony and comment on demeanor of arrestee who has not received Miranda warning. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 7, 2001
U.S. v. Tam
Prosecution commits harmless error by suggesting jury use secret ballot to select foreperson. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 7, 2001
Romano v. Gibson
Failure to disclose police officer's unrecorded recollection did not prejudice defendants convicted of first-degree murder. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 7, 2001
U.S. v. Bazuaye
Money laundering involving checks issued by credit card company constitutes crime involving interstate commerce. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 7, 2001
U. S. v. Matthews
Court must examine statutes or copies of convictions when defendant challenges sentence enhancement on basis that previous convictions are not qualifying offenses. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 7, 2001
U.S. v. Garlick
Convictions for separate counts of wire fraud proper where more than one fax transmission were used. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 7, 2001
U.S. v. Ma
Postal employee convicted of theft of undelivered mail properly receives sentence enhancement for abuse of position of trust. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 7, 2001
People v. Turley
No violation of equal protection where defendants entitled to different number of peremptory challenges. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 6, 2001
People v. Corichi
Competency hearing held fifteen months after trial did not violate defendant's due process rights. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 6, 2001
People v. Wright
Trial court violated defendant's double jeopardy rights by increasing amount of a restitution order. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 6, 2001
Washington v. Ceglowski
Evidence must demonstrate more than single isolated incident of illegal drug activity to sustain conviction for maintaining 'drug house.' 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 6, 2001
State v. Gill
Conviction for threatening witness based solely on letter upheld despite lack of jury instruction requiring unanimity of verdict. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 6, 2001
State v. Krajeski
Landlord and mother entering apartment own on initiative and informing police of stolen property, not acting as agents of state conducting illegal search. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 6, 2001
U.S. v. Crawford
Conviction of mail fraud only requires proof of defendant's knowledge that she did not personally own property obtained by fraud. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 6, 2001
Depetris v. Kuykendall
Excluding wife's testimony concerning her belief that she was in imminent danger when she killed her husband is prejudicial. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 6, 2001
In re. Wolf
Court errs in instructing jury that outpatient facility must agree to accept patient before court can order less restrictive alternative treatment program. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 6, 2001
U.S. v. Castaneda
Vulnerable-victim sentence enhancement isn't appropriate where factors that make victim vulnerable are usual for victims of offense. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 6, 2001
U.S. v. Taylor
Defendant convicted of transporting minor for purposes of prostitution need not know victim was minor. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 6, 2001
Flowers v. Walter
Prohibition against forced administration of drugs to criminal defendant is new constitutional rule that may be retroactively applied in habeas proceeding. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 6, 2001
People v. Covington
Photograph of victim's injury taken by physician's assistant at request of police are not protected by privilege, but are medical testimony. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 6, 2001
Christman v. Suthers
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 3, 2001
Santillanes v. Lemaster
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 3, 2001
U.S. v. Gaddis
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 3, 2001
Daniels v. United States
Prior convictions not set aside by time of sentencing under Armed Career Criminal Act are presumptively valid for sentence enhancement. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 3, 2001
Lackawanna County District Attorney v. Coss
Prior conviction used to enhance state sentence not open to direct or collateral attack if defendant failed to exhaust all available remedies. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 3, 2001
U.S. v. King
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 3, 2001
Thompson v. Boone
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 3, 2001
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.