| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
99-10091
|
U.S. v. Dorais
Drugs from hotel room may be admitted as evidence because check out time had expired. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 8, 2001 | |
|
00-10118
|
U.S. v. Parker
District court erred in imposing enhancements for physical restraint of victim and use of minor on sentence of convicted bank robber. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 8, 2001 | |
|
00-7096
|
Browning v. U.S.
Proper retroactivity test for second habeas applications under federal statute is whether Supreme Court has specifically declared new rule applies retroactivly. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 8, 2001 | |
|
46014-5
|
State v. Kistner
Once Department of Corrections imposes sanctions for violation of conditions, trial court is not precluded from revoking suspended sentence based on same violation. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 7, 2001 | |
|
43678-3
|
State v. Franks
Charging language in information accusing different person deprives defendant of her right to be informed of the charges against her. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 7, 2001 | |
|
00-5083
|
U.S. v. Gonzales
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 7, 2001 | |
|
00-6343
|
U.S. v. Key
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 7, 2001 | |
|
00-6436
|
Hanks v. Saffle
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 7, 2001 | |
|
00-1349
|
U.S. v. Mendoza-Ramos
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 7, 2001 | |
|
00-6453
|
Austin v. Saffle
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 7, 2001 | |
|
00-6459
|
Carpenter v. Saffle
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 7, 2001 | |
|
00-1284
|
U.S. v. Gonzalez
Dismissal with prejudice after defendant's successful motion for mistrial is improper absent prosecutorial intent to provoke defendant's motion. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 7, 2001 | |
|
00-1315
|
Bishop v. People
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 7, 2001 | |
|
00-8067
|
Handy v. Everett
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 7, 2001 | |
|
00-6347
|
Mehdipour v. Chapel
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 7, 2001 | |
|
01-1043
|
Bradshaw v. U.S.
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 7, 2001 | |
|
00-7121
|
Stuart v. Goss
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 7, 2001 | |
|
25159-1-II
|
State v. Hendricks
Version of law in effect when defendants pleaded guilty requires court to count juvenile convictions in determining 'offense score.' |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 7, 2001 | |
|
24962-6-II
|
State v. Thomas
Termination provision of Criminal Profiteering Act is not repealed in subsequent insurance fraud act. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 7, 2001 | |
|
S083619
|
People v. Matthews
Review granted |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 7, 2001 | |
|
99CA0231
|
People v. Flagg
Application of mandatory parole law not violative of ex post facto principles. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 7, 2001 | |
|
S088091
|
People v. Masloski
Review granted |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 7, 2001 | |
|
S088025
|
People v. Sanchez
Review granted |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 7, 2001 | |
|
99CA0455
|
People v. Ramirez
Jury instruction adequately explained elements necessary for burglary conviction. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 7, 2001 | |
|
98CA1459
|
People v. Martinez
Statements made by assault victim admissible under excited utterance exception to hearsay rule. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 7, 2001 | |
|
S083267
|
People v. Cervantes
Review granted |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 7, 2001 | |
|
24799-2
|
State v. Coria
Defendant who damaged marital property cannot be convicted of malicious mischief. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 7, 2001 | |
|
24938-3
|
State v. Red
Defendant on trial for attempted murder is not entitled to jury instruction regarding attempted manslaughter. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 7, 2001 | |
|
24767-4
|
State v. Delgado
Witness who refuses to answer self-incriminating questions is not required to invoke privilege for each question. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 7, 2001 | |
|
00SA308
|
People v. Brazzel
Supreme court reverses suppression order so trial court can make additional findings as to whether defendant voluntarily consented to search of home. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 7, 2001 |