For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Read Today's Digital Edition
Place Your Legal Notices
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court

Name Category Published
State v. Vreen
Erroneous denial of peremptory challenge is not harmless when objectionable juror actually deliberates on jury that convicted defendant. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jul. 2, 2001
People v. Howze
Because of defendant's disruptive behavior and refusal to appear in court, court didn't err in commencing trial in defendant's absence. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jul. 2, 2001
State v. Marsh
Statute disqualifying non-English speaking potential jurors complies with public policy and is constitutional. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jul. 2, 2001
State v. Walls
As required by escape statute, defendant was detained pursuant to felony conviction when causal relationship between warrant and prior felony convictions exists. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jul. 2, 2001
State v. Leffingwell
Washington courts have jurisdiction if essential element of offense is committed in state. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jul. 2, 2001
People v. Epps
Denial of jury trial for defendant's prior offenses does not require reversal of latest conviction. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jul. 2, 2001
People v. Morales
No prosecutorial misconduct in closing statement that asserted drug use implies drug possession where defendant did not dispute possession. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jul. 2, 2001
People v. Atkins
Evidence of voluntary intoxication does not negate requisite intent required to prove mental state for arson. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jul. 2, 2001
People v. J.M.
Trial court not authorized to sentence parent of juvenile delinquent to jail. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jul. 2, 2001
People v. Torkelson
County court judge may not act as a district court judge without proper appointment of chief judge of the district. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jul. 2, 2001
People v. Ball
Direct filing of charges against juvenile in district court is inappropriate where no crime of violence alleged. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jul. 2, 2001
People v. McGinnis
Defendant who committed crimes to fund drug addiction is entitled to evaluation for rehabilitation program. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jul. 2, 2001
In re Resendiz
Incorrect advice from attorney relating to consequences of guilty plea on immigration status is not ineffective assistance of counsel. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jul. 2, 2001
U.S. v. Sherburne
Awarding attorney fees to defendant for wrongful criminal prosecution must not involve second-guessing reasonableness of government's tactical decisions. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jul. 2, 2001
People v. Palmer
Defendant convicted of continuous sexual abuse is not eligible for sentence under 'one strike' law. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jul. 1, 2001
Rademan v. Superior Court (Joseph)
Trial court may review records of psychotherapist's patients to determine if crime/tort exception to psychotherapist-patient privilege is applicable. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jul. 1, 2001
People v. Luera
Child pornography is admissible despite anonymity of informant and apparently inconsistent accounts by police officer. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jul. 1, 2001
People v. McPherson
Imposing consecutive sentences is proper where defendant commits two separate crimes: aiding and abetting rape and rape. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jul. 1, 2001
People v. Jenkins
When offenses are committed on same occasion and arise from same set of operative facts, court doesn't have discretion to sentence concurrently. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jul. 1, 2001
People v. Lozano
Sentence enhancement is not proper if it results in double punishment of gang member under two separate statutes. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jul. 1, 2001
People v. Hein
Defendant who stood in doorway as murder was being committed does not deserve finding of special circumstances. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jul. 1, 2001
People v. Perez
Two sentence enhancements for murder do not violate due process where defendant 's manner of killing exhibited premeditation and motive. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jul. 1, 2001
People v. Parmar
Contract in which county housing authority partially funds nuisance-prosecution position in district attorney's office isn't contrary to public policy. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jul. 1, 2001
People v. Montoya
Counsel for mentally disordered offender may waive client's right to jury at hearing to extend involuntary treatment. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jul. 1, 2001
People v. Sanchez
Gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated is not lesser included offense of murder. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jul. 1, 2001
People v. Munoz
Sequential designation of judges authorized to consider wiretap applications does not violate statute or legislative intent. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jul. 1, 2001
People v. Currie
Right to impartial jury isn't violated because underrepresentation of group not caused by selection process but by members' failure to appear. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jul. 1, 2001
People v. Cleveland
Consecutive sentence imposed by judge isn't factual determination which increased defendant's penalty and must be determined by jury. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jul. 1, 2001
People v. Lavin
Oregon prisoner's handwritten demand is not sufficient to trigger 180-day deadline to bring charges in California. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jun. 29, 2001
Calderon v. Superior Court (People)
Multiple defendants charged with crimes arising from separate, unrelated incidents should not be tried together if it would result in unfair prejudice. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jun. 29, 2001
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.