For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Read Today's Digital Edition
Place Your Legal Notices
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court

Name Category Published
Brambles v. Duncan
Habeas petitioner was not entitled to equitable tolling because district court did not 'affirmatively mislead' him about filing deadline. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 27, 2005
People v. Perez
Defendant caught with methamphetamine precursors intended for sale is not culpable for possession with intent to manufacture. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 27, 2005
U.S. v. Combs
'Knock and announce' rule does not require an actual knock as long as police acted reasonably under totality of circumstances. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 26, 2005
Coffey v. Superior Court (People)
Defendant convicted of 'wobbler' offense is not entitled to return of DNA samples. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 26, 2005
People v. Castille
Statements obtained in joint interview of three defendants were properly admitted at trial. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 26, 2005
People v. Wright
Trial court was not required to allow testimony that expert relied upon to conclude defendant was delusional. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 26, 2005
People v. Randle
Trial court erred in refusing to instruct on imperfect defense of others. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 26, 2005
Lowry v. Gutierrez
Officer had reasonable cause to stop driver on suspicion of drunk driving based on report from anonymous cellphone caller. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 26, 2005
People v. Keichler
Restitution to victims of crime can include cost of spiritual healing ceremony. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 26, 2005
People v. Pena
Admission of out-of-court statement implicating defendants as gang members violated Confrontation Clause. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 26, 2005
People v. Tapia
Defendant carrying gun on public sidewalk violated law prohibiting possession of firearm in school zone. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 26, 2005
People v. Taulton
Records of prior convictions are not 'testimonial' and thus not subject to confrontation requirement. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 26, 2005
Baustert v. Superior Court (People)
Unavailability of trial witness due to vacation does not constitute good cause for continuance. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 26, 2005
Warrick v. Superior Court (City of Los Angeles Police Dept.)
'Pitchess' motion need only demonstrate that scenario of alleged officer misconduct could or might have occurred. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 26, 2005
People v. Whitney
Defendant's convictions in Texas for indecency with child were sexually violent offenses under SVP Act. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 26, 2005
People v. Reed
Conviction for attempted possession of controlled substance does not support sentence enhancement. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 26, 2005
People v. Rhodes
Court's failure to instruct jury on self-defense had prejudicial impact on defendant accused of shooting at occupied vehicle. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 26, 2005
People v. Calderon
Defendant who fatally collided with other motorist during high-speed police chase is entitled to new murder trial. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 26, 2005
People v. Brady
Intervening acts of victim did not absolve defendant of responsibility for victim's death. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 26, 2005
In re Salazar
Exculpatory evidence allegedly suppressed by district attorney's office was not 'material.' 		Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 26, 2005
People v. Rodriguez
One strike law allows trial court to impose concurrent terms for multiple lewd acts against multiple victims. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 26, 2005
People v. Lopez
Defense attorney's failure to object to evidence against his own witnesses requires new trial for client. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 26, 2005
In re Bautista
Defendant cannot be convicted of both continuous sexual abuse and procurement of child within same time period. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 26, 2005
In re Honesto
Convict's claim that plea agreement entitled him to release on parole was unfounded. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 26, 2005
People v. Thomas
Law requiring prosecutor's consent to juvenile sentencing for serious offenses is invalid. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 26, 2005
U.S. v. Munoz
Defendant is entitled to new trial for bringing illegal aliens into United States for financial gain. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 26, 2005
People v. Vega
Defendants' enhancements for transporting large amounts of cocaine is upheld despite criminalist's failure to weigh each brick of cocaine. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 26, 2005
People v. Gallardo
Police search of vehicle after receiving motorist's consent did not unreasonably prolong traffic stop for broken taillight. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 26, 2005
People v. Medina
Felony convictions for which defendant had not yet been sentenced still count as 'strikes' under Three Strikes law. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 26, 2005
People v. Samuels
Court did not err when it reiterated jury instruction after question about meaning of 'life imprisonment without possibility of parole.' 		Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 26, 2005
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.