For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Read Today's Digital Edition
Place Your Legal Notices
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court

Name Category Published
People v. Avila
Prosecutor did not exercise due diligence in trying to secure witness' appearance on morning of trial. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 12, 2005
People v. Jackson
Trial court improperly extended defendant's probationary term beyond statutory maximum. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 12, 2005
People v. Davis
Defendant's convictions for first-degree murder and death sentence are affirmed. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 12, 2005
People v. Roquemore
Suspect who asked for 'mom or lawyer' during questioning did not unambiguously invoke Miranda rights. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 12, 2005
People v. Kennedy
Witness' identification of shooting suspect was admissible despite mistakes regarding height and facial hair. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 12, 2005
The Roman Catholic Archbishop of Los Angeles v. Superior Court (People)
Disclosure of documents in sexual assault cases against priests did not violate clergy-penitent privilege. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 12, 2005
People v. Rodriguez
One strike law allows trial court to impose concurrent terms for multiple lewd acts against multiple victims. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 10, 2005
People v. Seijas
Court properly allowed witness in murder trial to assert privilege against self-incrimination. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 10, 2005
In re Lowe
Governor's reversal of grant of parole to convicted murderer was supported by evidence. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 10, 2005
People v. Williams
Statute prohibiting 'willful or wanton' fleeing of police officer does not include impermissible mandatory presumption. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 10, 2005
People v. Athar
Sentence enhancement for money laundering may be imposed even though defendant is convicted of only conspiracy to engage in money laundering. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 10, 2005
People v. Martinez
State agency seeking to recover costs for clean-up of drug lab must bring claim under Health and Safety Code. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 10, 2005
People v. Jiang
Police interpreter did not adequately inform Mandarin speaker of his Miranda rights. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 10, 2005
People v. Rege
Search of area immediately accessible to suspect incident to her arrest did not violate Fourth Amendment. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 10, 2005
People v. Banuelos
Court finding that defendant's prior assault qualified as serious felony for sentencing purposes was not supported by record. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 10, 2005
U.S. v. Thomas
Defense counsel's concession of defendant's guilt on robbery charge was not presumptively prejudicial. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 10, 2005
Gaston v. Palmer
Deadline for federal habeas petition is tolled during interval between dismissal of one state habeas petition and filing of another. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 10, 2005
U.S. v. Dupas
Supreme Court holding making Sentencing Guidelines advisory may be applied retroactively. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 10, 2005
U.S. v. Brown
Defendant's enhanced sentence on account of prior convictions did not violate his right to jury trial. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 10, 2005
U.S. v. Dowd
Court may impose consecutive sentence after evaluating factors outlined in federal sentencing guidelines. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 10, 2005
Brierton v. Department of Motor Vehicles
Circumstances of defendant's driving provided reasonable suspicion for traffic stop and suspension of license. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 5, 2005
Bradley v. Henry
In camera conference to consider replacement of counsel conducted without defendant violates due process. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 5, 2005
Foosadas v. Superior Court (People)
Court cannot institute rule that defendant must object to temporary judge prior to first hearing. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 5, 2005
People v. Banuelos
Court finding that defendant's prior assault qualified as serious felony for sentencing purposes was not supported by record. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 5, 2005
People v. Dial
Claim seeking order destroying information obtained by post-sentencing DNA test is not cognizable on criminal appeal. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 5, 2005
U.S. v. Camacho
Sanctions by military employer and subsequent criminal charges filed against defendant for same theft act do not violate Double Jeopardy Clause. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 5, 2005
Mujahid v. Daniels
Bureau of Prisons may limit to 470 days good time credit of prisoner serving ten-year sentence. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 5, 2005
U.S. v. Nakai
Transfer of trial to community with smaller Native American population did not deprive defendant of fair representation of community. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 5, 2005
U.S. v. Vo
Twelve days during which detention motion was pending are excludable for speedy trial calculation although they did not result in pretrial delay. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 5, 2005
People v. Ferris
State does not bear burden of proving defendant's sanity beyond reasonable doubt. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 5, 2005
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.