For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Read Today's Digital Edition
Place Your Legal Notices
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court

Name Category Published
U.S. v. Pacheco-Navarette
Court lacks jurisdiction to hear appeals because defendants knowingly and voluntarily entered guilty pleas. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Mar. 16, 2006
Ferrizz v. Giurbino
Where jury could rationally find defendant guilty of burglary and grand theft of lost property, defendant's convictions are upheld. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Mar. 16, 2006
Motley v. Parks
Summary judgment is proper where officers had probable cause to believe that defendant lived at searched residence. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Mar. 16, 2006
U.S. v. Fifield
Court was not required to provide notice and to find particular fact before imposing federal sentences to run consecutively to state sentences. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Mar. 16, 2006
U.S. v. Southwell
Court's failure to answer jury's question concerning unanimity requirement as to insanity defense was abuse of discretion. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Mar. 16, 2006
U.S. v. Adams
District court erred in failing to advise defendant that he faced imposition of mandatory fine under Sentencing Guidelines. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Mar. 16, 2006
People v. Partida
Exclusion of objectionable portion of gang testimony would not result in more favorable verdict for appellant. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Mar. 15, 2006
People v. Murphy
Search of defendant's residence violated 'knock-notice' requirements thus evidence seized must be suppressed. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Mar. 15, 2006
People v. Robinson
Defendant waived issue of whether victim-impact evidence presented was properly admitted. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Mar. 15, 2006
People v. Smith
Substantial evidence supports defendant's conviction for attempted murder of baby. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Mar. 15, 2006
People v. Torres
Sexually violent predator who was civilly committed for mental disorder was not entitled to same procedures afforded to criminal defendants. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Mar. 7, 2006
People v. Semaan
People cannot use bank funds of innocent third party for victim restitution without proving that she had no legitimate interest in funds. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Mar. 7, 2006
People v. Pitto
Jury instruction failing to require finding of 'facilitative nexus' between presence of firearm and underlying offense was prejudicial. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Mar. 7, 2006
People v. Cross
Sexual perpetrator's state prison sentence of six years plus consecutive 15-year-to-life term was not cruel and unusual punishment. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Mar. 7, 2006
People v. Licas
Assault with firearm was not lesser included offense of shooting from vehicle. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Mar. 7, 2006
Welch (David) E.) on H.C.
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Mar. 7, 2006
People v. Baylor
Admission of police detective's statements regarding identification by witness did not violate defendant's confrontation rights. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Mar. 2, 2006
Brown v. Lambert
Prospective juror's view on capital punishment was not cause enough to warrant his excusal during voir dire. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Mar. 1, 2006
Moreno v. Baca
Because parolee is not stripped of all Fourth Amendment protection, denial of officers' qualified immunity claims was proper. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Mar. 1, 2006
Fields v. Brown
Defendant failed to show prejudicial constitutional error regarding jury misconduct and counsel performance. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 22, 2006
U.S. v. Prime
District court did not abuse its discretion in allowing testimony of expert handwriting analyst. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 22, 2006
Carty v. Nelson
Government may use documentary evidence at civil commitment hearing for sexually violent predator. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 22, 2006
Earp v. Ornoski
Death row inmate is entitled to evidentiary hearing on claims of prosecutorial misconduct and ineffective assistance of counsel. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 22, 2006
People v. Ringo
Defendant's pre-Proposition 21 conviction for making criminal threat qualifies as serious felony. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 21, 2006
People v. Manriquez
California's sentencing scheme imposing death penalty does not violate Federal Constitution. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 17, 2006
People v. Yartz
Defendant's no contest plea for child molestation may be used as prior conviction to support civil commitment under Sexually Violent Predators Act. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 17, 2006
People v. Jackson
Although trial court properly found probationer in violation of probation, it improperly extended probationary term for additional five years. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 17, 2006
U.S. v. Howard
Government courtroom policies cannot be given same degree of deference that are given to government prison policies. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 14, 2006
Miranda v. City of Cornelius
Community caretaking doctrine allows police to impound where necessary to ensure that location or operation of vehicles does not jeopardize public safety. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 14, 2006
U.S. v. Schneider
'Ameline' remand to district court is required to ascertain sentencing under now advisory-only U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Feb. 14, 2006
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.