| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
S022224
|
People v. Stanley
Judgment sentencing defendant to death was proper, but aggregate determinate sentence for his noncapital offenses must be reduced by two years. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 22, 2006 | |
|
G035368
|
People v. MacArthur
Where defendant was convicted of receiving stolen property, jury should have been instructed with definition of 'stolen' and 'theft.' |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 22, 2006 | |
|
S130860
|
People v. Dominguez
Defendant arguing actual consent is not entitled to instruction on 'Mayberry' rape defense, nor nonkiller felony-murder liability, once convicted of underlying rape. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 22, 2006 | |
|
S124090
|
People v. Garcia
Collateral estoppel bars state from prosecuting benefit recipients for welfare fraud who have been exonerated in administrative proceedings. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 22, 2006 | |
|
C050124
|
People v. Massie
In torture case, offender harbored specific intent to cause extreme pain even if he acted 'in explosion of violence.' |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 22, 2006 | |
|
B186639
|
People v. Green
Commitment order is not proper where act of kicking out window of police car does not fall within Mentally Disordered Offender statute. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 22, 2006 | |
|
E037036
|
People v. Smith
Burglary conviction is proper where danger arose from defendant's forced entry of his own home. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 22, 2006 | |
|
S022224
|
People v. Stanley
Judgment sentencing defendant to death was proper, but aggregate determinate sentence for his noncapital offenses must be reduced by two years. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 20, 2006 | |
|
C047785
|
People v. Estrada
Burglary conviction stands where during voir dire of prospective jurors, court properly told them that jurors must not participate in 'jury nullification'. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 20, 2006 | |
|
B182346
|
People v. Celis
For jury instruction purposes, murder was 'complete' when victim died, not when fatal blow was struck. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 20, 2006 | |
|
S126550
|
People v. Cottle
Once trial jury has been impaneled, regardless of whether alternate jurors are sworn, trial court lacks discretion to reopen jury selection. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 20, 2006 | |
|
05-30066
|
U.S. v. Guerrero-Velasquez
For purposes of sentencing guidelines, court must consider charging allegations when determining whether prior conviction under 'Alford' plea is crime of violence. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 19, 2006 | |
|
C048031
|
People v. Musovich
Failure to charge sex offender with Penal Code Section 290(a)(1)(A) violation is harmless when offender is charged with Section 290(g)(2) violation. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 19, 2006 | |
|
S128442
|
People v. Wright
Defendant found with scale and packages totaling one pound of marijuana may present Compassionate Use Act defense. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 19, 2006 | |
|
05-50092
|
U.S. v. Adjani
Incriminating evidence found on computer while executing valid search warrant at suspect's residence was admissible against suspect and third-party computer owner. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 19, 2006 | |
|
02-30216
|
U.S. v. Lynch
In illegal drug trafficking case, Hobbs Act is satisfied where there was sufficient evidence of direct effect on interstate commerce. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 19, 2006 | |
|
05-50524
|
U.S. v. Maciel-Vasquez
Court's decision to impose drug testing condition of supervised release did not seriously affect fairness, integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 19, 2006 | |
|
05-30313
|
U.S. v. Young
Federal firearm conviction based upon person's subjection to domestic violence restraining order may be upheld, even if order was invalid. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 19, 2006 | |
|
05-30134
|
U.S. v. Hartz
Conviction of interference with commerce by robbery is proper where admitted evidence was obtained during lawful police search. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 19, 2006 | |
|
05-30186
|
U.S. v. Manzo-Jurado
Seemingly innocuous behavior does not justify investigatory stop of suspected illegal aliens unless accompanied by particularlarized conduct that corroborates officer's suspicions. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 18, 2006 | |
|
05-30081
|
U.S. v. Ferryman
Offender's possession of firearms was in connection to offense of manufacturing marijuana thereby making him ineligible for relief from mandatory minimum sentence. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 18, 2006 | |
|
04-10571
|
U.S. v. Elliot
Where district court correctly found defendant's counsel had conflict of interest, court did not err in ruling manifest necessity justified mistrial. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 18, 2006 | |
|
G034265
|
People v. Munoz
Trial court violated defendant's Sixth Amendment rights by denying his motion to relieve his retained attorney. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 18, 2006 | |
|
G034988
|
People v. Najera
Defense attorney's failure to object to prosecutor's misstatements about law was harmless because defendant was not entitled to manslaughter instruction. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 18, 2006 | |
|
04-30300
|
U.S. v. Littlesun
In drug sale case, hearsay testimony against defendant was properly admitted by court during sentencing. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 18, 2006 | |
|
03-17098
|
Boyd v. Newland
State court did not violate clearly established federal law by using nonjury juvenile adjudication to enhance sentence. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 18, 2006 | |
|
02-99004
|
Hoffman v. Arave
Defendant received ineffective assistance of counsel during plea bargaining process where counsel's advice was based on incomplete research. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 18, 2006 | |
|
04-35514
|
Roy v. Lampert
Where habeas petitioners made sufficient allegations that they pursued claims diligently, they are entitled to evidentiary hearing on issue of equitable tolling. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 18, 2006 | |
|
04-36009
|
Weaver v. Palmateer
Grant of habeas relief is not proper where petitioner cannot show prejudice in his ineffective assistance of counsel claim. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 18, 2006 | |
|
04-50392
|
U.S. v. Salazar
Sufficient evidence supports finding defendant willfully and unlawfully caused destruction of documents filed and deposited with INS. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 18, 2006 |